George Blair's Speech Rhetorical Essay

Improved Essays
Throughout his speech, Blair represents himself as being both knowledgeable and trustworthy as he explains his decision to declare war against Iraq. The primary audience however, is represented as being both noble as they support Blair’s decision for war, but also as a group that needs reassurance, and Blair provides such for them throughout his speech. Therefore, through representing war as a just move, and the Iraqi government as corrupt, Blair encourages the British audience that war between Britain and Iraq is the right decision, as he speaks with a reassuring, yet authoritative tone towards both his primary and his secondary audience (Britain, and then Iraq).
One of Blair’s most influential representations in the speech is that of the
…show more content…
While he doesn’t mention the British government or himself directly very much, he represents himself as a trustworthy and knowledgeable individual more subtly, mainly through his language choices. One of the most notable of these is his strong use of authoritative dialogue an example being in the quote “our commitment”. The use of the word “commitment” suggests strength and motivation, which would ultimately reassure the audience of the speech that Blair’s claims were genuine, making him seem like a trustworthy figure. Another way in which Blair represents himself as being trustworthy is through his use of emotive language towards his secondary audience, Iraq. As Iraq is originally thought to be Britain’s target, the way in which Blair says “We are with you.” in a reassuring, simplistic tone offers ideals of a trustworthy man, who truly has everyone’s best interests at heart in declaring war against Iraq. This image is heightened by his use of dysphemism following the previous quote, whereby he switches his audience’s attention towards the “barbarous rulers” of Iraq, furthering his point about Iraq’s citizens not being Britain’s “enemy”. This use of dysphemism suggests a divide between the two, and therefore helps him with his representation of himself – as being trustworthy and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The most compelling and convincing argument I find to be is Thomas Paine’s. The reason I choose Thomas Paine for the best argument is because he stated facts in his document by telling his “common sense”. He wanted the realization that even though the British did help the Americans, it is not their duty to rule their colonies and construct rules to people to go by in a country that is not theirs. The logos appeal more to me than pathos because using logos can blatantly give true evidence to support an argument, rather than to argue with pathos to convince an audience by thinking emotionally which can strongly change a person’s view. I liked both the analogies and statistics to get a good taste of what these three had to say for their arguments.…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nixon draws on the fantasy theme that America is a defender of the weak and of moral goodness. These appeals support his plan of finishing the war because Americans feel they must uphold these roles as a people because of their value of commitment. Nixon states, “We…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through his powerful combination of rhetorical elements, Richard Nixon is able to make his point about the Vietnam War, and uses logic and reasoning, along with other factors, to show the Americans his dedication to the war, because he truly believes that it is America’s duty to prevent communism and protect allies not only for diplomacy, but to establish itself as a world power. He therefore stresses, with respect, that the “silent majority” must rise, so that America can continue to carry on and to continue with its…

    • 1291 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Roosevelt says “This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. In such a spirit on my part and on yours we face our common difficulties”(1). Through the use of the phrases "speak the truth" and "the whole truth," Roosevelt shows how he is willing to be honest with Americans. Rather than downplaying the issues, Roosevelt emphasizes that he is ready to discuss the country's problems in an open way. Because Roosevelt places an emphasis on honesty, he is able to build the audience's belief that he is a man of character whom they can trust.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using intensity to show the American people that not every mess up has an answer, so that they need to shape up now! The words he uses is, “It is a sobering thing, my friends, to be a servant to this great cause. The fact he uses sobering and servant to explain what it is to be the leader is interesting. He believes that his heart can take this and what America needs. The word freedom to Roosevelt meant a limitation of power.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hitler said things about himself that made him look amazing, but in the end, they were not true. The country was falling, so when the people heard even the simplest thing about helping the country, they were all for it. Hitler said things like these which made him look like a great leader, when in reality he wasn’t. For instance, in the speech from Hitler, it says, “I myself am a front-line solider and I know how grave a thing war is. I wanted to spare the German people such an evil.”(Hitler 78) This illustrates that Hitler is trying to convince the people of Germany that he knows how the people feel and wants the best for them when in reality he wants the best for himself.…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms speech was meant to rally the United States out of neutrality. And it succeeded; American joined the effort to “pursue a global struggle … not for the character of the combat, but for the rightness of the cause and the unity of purpose” that the president had convinced them of (Kaye). FDR uses all the rhetorical appeals to support his pathetic goal. He used ethos to support him in the role of war-time president, logos to illustrate the reasons to end America’s neutral stance and pathos to rally and prepare the American people to support and eventually enter the war. This speech exemplifies one key aspect of presidential rhetoric, a national pep talk.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore in paragraphs twenty two by using extreme examples of Hitler’s persecution and the freedom fighters, Dr. King uses history in order to depict the fact that sometimes what is legal is unjust and what is illegal is actually just. In that way he reasons with the reader and points out the fallacies in the clergymen’s argument once again. His logos appeal allows him to take a slow approach by gently providing example to convince them of his ideas. Through his logos appeal, he also does build ethos as he shows he is knowledgeable in this cause and justified to speak of the manner, furthermore the cause has directly affected him as he has been included in the segregation, and put in jail due to civil disobedience showing how he can speak on this matter. By using icons from the bible as examples, he also builds pathos as many people are Christians who can relate to icons, and as a result Dr. King is able to appeal to the reader through pathos, ethos, and most prominently logos so show how civil disobedience is…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As an American Adam’s too disfavors the British; however, he argues it is the moral decision to honor them as evidence validates their innocence. Furthermore, he believes saving at least one of these men through his righteous actions, it will be sufficient for all of mankind. Adam’s affirms the logic behind the innocence of the soldiers by referring to Marquis of Beccaria. Beccaria is widely thought to be the most talented jurist. Adams quotation of such an honorable man shows the jury the lucid defense of the British, as it is the side Beccaria would take.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Because Hooten showed that he has the ability to display both sides of the argument, his readers respect the effort that he put into researching about the language of war. He directly engages with his audience by stating that “At this point, you may be wondering, doesn’t this guy know that the war on terrorism is actually a war on terrorists?” (397). Also, he mentions that “Doesn’t he realize that this exercise in logic has nothing to do with the reality of reality?” (397). Because Hooten incorporated an opposing view in his essay, his credibility as a writer increases significantly. This is because Hooten shows that he is confident enough to refute potential claims that discredit his own arguments.…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays