Rhetorical Analysis Of Abortion By Mathewes-Green

Decent Essays
During her college years, Mathewes-Green was a pro-choice activist and viewed abortion as a right that all women should have, regardless of the consequences. She effectively uses personal anecdotes throughout her writing to inform the audience about the negative aspects of abortion. Mathewes-Green “was strongly in favor of legalizing abortion...we thought that few abortions would ever be done...we expected that abortion would be rare” (P 1,4,6). The reader can tell that she regrets thinking that few abortions would happen and Mathewes-Green realizes her mistake in thinking that would be true. She tries to convince the reader that no harm would be done within the process, but she admits that she was very, very wrong later on in the article.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Comparative Rhetorical Analysis: Staples vs Gay The false belief and fear of African Americans began once abolition became a possibility in the nineteenth century. Since then, the ingrained fear has grown to affect almost all people, regardless if they are conscious of their prejudice beliefs or not. Ross Gay, an associate professor of creative writing at Indiana University Bloomington and author of “Some Thoughts On Mercy,” shines light on the impact of racial stereotypes on African American people’s perceptions of themselves and the importance of acknowledging these fears and prejudices.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This language continues to depict these men as having a minimal role in a couple’s decision to abort the pregnancy, even though Reardon’s main findings in his survey of 1000 men waiting in an abortion clinic showed that “The overwhelming majority, 83 percent, opposed any legal restrictions on abortion, and 45 percent stated that they had urged an abortion.” (Reardon). Reardon constantly contradicts himself with the language used to describe the average man’s freedom in abortion and his statistical findings. Readers are forced to create their own opinions on Reardon’s findings based on his facts and language. Do they side with pathos and empathize with men and their emotional hardship?…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George believes that abortion should not be legalized. That it should be restricted. He states “A pro-life advocate sees abortion as a sin against God who infuses life at the moment of conception; a pro-choice advocate sees abortion as a decision to be made in accordance with the best scientific opinion as to when the beginning of life, as we know it, occurs.” (182) I believe that in the bible it does state that abortion is wrong, so Mr. George made a good point there.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophy is the application of ethical approaches to issues, controversies, theories, and ideas. It is in one’s nature to seek answers to questions which are asked. It is also in one’s nature to question and decide if an idea or ideal is right or wrong, but in the case of ethics; permissible or impermissible. In this text, we are going to use these terms as acceptable or permitted and vice-versa. In this essay, we will be analyzing the article, “A Defense of Abortion” by philosopher, Judith Jarvis Thompson.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An abortion is the medical procedure of destroying an embryo before birth, to prevent having a child. Abortions have caused many issues of controversy to arise, relating to the sanctity of life and the moral and legal status of induced labour. Many women turn to abortion services to abort their child under many different circumstances. These may be due to health, financial, social and personal circumstances ( such as rape, incest and or failure of contraception). In the UK women have the freedom of choice to have an abortion, this is situations of child neglect, child abuse and harassment from people that are unfit or in no position to be parents.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For this constructive rhetorical analysis, I chose two sources one being academic and the other a popular source. The academic source is written by Joseph E. Potter, Imelda M. Flores-Vazquez, Richard L. Allgeyer, Pete Schenkkan, and Amanda J. Stevenson, from the New England Journal of Medicine titled, Effect of Removal of Planned Parenthood from the Texas Women’s Health. The popular source chosen is written by Deborah Netburn, of the Los Angeles Times titled, After Texas stopped funding Planned Parenthood, low-income women had more babies. The academic article by Joseph E. Potter and colleagues researches the effects of Planned Parenthood cuts in Texas while Netbur’s, article uses the research done by Joseph E. Potter to write a segment for…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson who studied at Cambridge University, she is an American philosopher who focuses on morals and abortion. She is well known for her work, “A Defense of Abortion” which she wrote about a woman's write to control her body and a fetus's right to life. The problem that she decided to spend most her time philosophizing on was abortion. Abortion has been a controversial topic for hundreds of years and Thomson decided to break it down to the basics and philosophize. Within Thomson’s essay she had multiple sections in her paper, The Basic Argument, The extreme view, What the Right to Life Is Not, and What the Right to Life Is.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philosophical critique on the traditional argument against abortion Robert Bertram - UBC ID: 24675373 Phil 333 (001) - Biomedical Ethics The University of British Columbia The concept of morality in relation to abortion is a significant cause of conflict. These moral ambiguities are put into question by Pope John Paul II’s excerpts on the “unspeakable crime of abortion” with regards to the validity, committed fallacies, and the fetus’s content to the right to life (Paul II, 1995, pg. 1). Paul II's Evangelium Vitae (1995), states that aborting a fetus is the "deliberate and direct killing...of a human being in the initial phase of his or her existence". In the paragraphs to follow, this essay will reconstruct the argument, and analyze Thomson's, and Warren's objection to Paul II's statement.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not realizing that if abortions are outlawed then the rate of deaths would increase because women who desperately don’t want a child may try to self terminating or seek help from unqualified people. Since the US Department of Public Health evaluates family planning an governmental programs the abortion rate data is relied on, in public health terms (lee&Sprague,2). Instead of outlawing abortions, another way to prevent them is to make advances in education, technology, and contraceptives. The percent of abortions have decreased since it reached the peak in 1984 because people are giving more education, making more technology and contraceptives better and effective. (Rich & Wagner,…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion, a controversial topic presently and decades ago, was made legal in the United States in 1973 by the legendary Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision. Countless speeches, editorials, and other persuasive pieces have been written on the topic, and one in particular was written by the New York Times Editorial Board regarding the restricting of access to abortions by state laws. In the editorial “Closing off Abortion Rights”, by the New York Times Editorial Board, the author effectively argues the illegality of certain state laws pertaining to abortion by using analogies, allusions, metaphors, and appeals to logic and reason because s/he ties together different arguments using a single Texas law as an example throughout the editorial and…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The viewpoints held by persuasive writers are often different from each other’s, sometimes even polar opposites, but the one thing all persuasive writing has in common is the use of rhetorical appeals. Ethos, logos, and pathos help authors convince readers of a point using credibility to impress the reader, reason and logic, and emotion to appeal to the reader’s sympathy. However, overuse of certain appeals can lead to an unreliable argument. Logos is the most reliable, as logos depends on facts, but information may still be twisted. Ethos deals with the credibility of the author, publisher, or a source from the writing, but sometimes credentials can blind readers; just because someone is an expert in a subject does not mean he or she is infallible.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Great Essays

    Unfortunately, Satan is running violently and unrestrained in the world today for Christians to say; in good faith you can abort a baby. The Catholics for Free Choice––an advocacy group, say you can in good faith abort a baby. The mere statement to have an abortion in good faith is ludicrous and even hypocritical to what God’s word says. In like manner, Mary Langlois writes on the Truth and Charity Forum.org: “Indeed the word ‘Catholic’ isn’t merely an adjective that modifies one’s personal opinions. To be Catholic is to partake in a sacramental reality, with logical claims to authority that flow from the essence of the faith.”…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy by the removal or expulsion from the uterus of a fetus or embryo prior to viability (Statistic Brain). Abortions have become one of the most common ways to end pregnancy. Three out of ten women in the United States have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old (Planet ParentHood). There are two different types of abortions women can have. The first is a clinic abortion and the second is the abortion pill.…

    • 1818 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays