9). Declaration from Salant and Dillman (1994, p. 77) states that emotionally and biased questions affect survey’s credibility and make responses to the question useless. The design of posed questionnaires should determine the validity of the survey (Capanelli, 1996). Repetitive questions and consistency in responses allow the determination for reliability. When assessing for a program evaluation, ensuring reliability of instruments to be utilized must be prioritized. Instrument that lacks reliability and the one that is very low in reliability are both worthless for all practical purposes (Royse, Thyler, & Padgett, 2014). However, selecting a valid and reliable assessment instruments would permit unbiased and trustworthiness collected results. Relying on the Martial Arts school, the conduction of the program evaluation must also regard its effectiveness; therefore a valid evaluative tool must be selected. The effectiveness of a program can be assessed with the impact evaluative reviews for goals accomplishment or excesses. (Durlak & DuPre, …show more content…
Technically, both evaluative models are combined (Karns, 2014). Relatively, the contribution of formative and summative evaluation discuss the benefits of both evaluative concepts; particularly the fashion a single assignment could be used both for Formative and summative aims (Karns, 2014). The use of questionnaire would be practical to survey the ERWCWMAAA program. The evaluator should ponder criteria for creating relevant questions to the program as well as selecting research format (Mcmain & Jerabeck, 2004). The evaluator should be aware of wording issues ad ponder open-ended and closed-ended questions and their application during the evaluative process; this would allow extended and explicit responses from respondents (Mcmain & Jerabeck, 2004).In effect, the ERWCWMAAA program seems to be reliable as reflected by its mission statements, goals, objectives, association purpose, as well as instructor’