Parents argue that students should “bathe in their own success”, and not the rewards they get from it. Success alone is its own reward, but what will motivate kids to actually succeed? Money is the only effective incentive. Because of the fact that America has used it for so long, it’s proven effective. Low income students are able to keep up with more privileged classmates. Rewarding students with money seemed to improve attendance and test scores. Paying students for quality grades should be in use because it’s effective, levels the playing field, and academics overall improve.
To begin with, students should take home money for quality grades because it’s simply effective. Claire Levison, a member of the National CPA states, “[paying for performance] … it’s been going on for a long time in Corporate America. I think it can be an effective incentive.” This shows that paying people for performance has been in use for so long, why not pay students? For decades now it’s been effective. This will lead to more students willing to learn, since there is something at the end to reward them. Obviously, paying students for quality grades is a great idea since it’s simply effective. …show more content…
Michelle Rhee, Washington, D.C. school chancellor argues that these programs “level the playing field for low-income kids… may be an effective tool for getting their attention in school.” The Chicago mayor also agrees with this claim. This means low-income students are able to catch up with students that have more resources and help. This effect will be that less fortunate students will have more help in school and at home. Clearly, paying students for quality grades should exist because it levels the playing
To begin with, students should take home money for quality grades because it’s simply effective. Claire Levison, a member of the National CPA states, “[paying for performance] … it’s been going on for a long time in Corporate America. I think it can be an effective incentive.” This shows that paying people for performance has been in use for so long, why not pay students? For decades now it’s been effective. This will lead to more students willing to learn, since there is something at the end to reward them. Obviously, paying students for quality grades is a great idea since it’s simply effective. …show more content…
Michelle Rhee, Washington, D.C. school chancellor argues that these programs “level the playing field for low-income kids… may be an effective tool for getting their attention in school.” The Chicago mayor also agrees with this claim. This means low-income students are able to catch up with students that have more resources and help. This effect will be that less fortunate students will have more help in school and at home. Clearly, paying students for quality grades should exist because it levels the playing