The evidence the revisionists have as their proof defending that the Holocaust or specific events or Nazi atrocities did not happen include, investigators took hair and hair clasps that were found in the investigation. These were tested for cyanide and tested the covers of ventilation ducts where it was told the prisoners were trapped under. These people dispute the validity of the accusations of the mass killings.
Accusations of the mass killings were disputed for the fact that investigators claim that the hair of the prisoners was cut off in relation to hygienic reasoning, such as lice, which was causing typhus. These claims and beliefs of the investigators come from there being no proof as to when these samples were from. In their argument, …show more content…
The revisionists did not try to prove or disprove their claims in any way but by word of mouth. They were using nonscientific behavior, and therefore their theories could not be proven true or untrue. During the time of the so-called gas chambers, or extermination camps, it is said that for three years’ trains took these Jews to death without people noticing, and one researcher went to visit this camp, but there was no possibility that claim could be true, and that a train carrying that mass number of people would stay hidden without people noticing. The findings made up by the investigators led them to truly believe that specific events in the holocaust did not occur. Other reasons for the skepticism, was again that there was no hard, strong evidence to prove the claims they were making. There was some testimony in the trials, however it was all based on oral testimony, rather than scientific evidence, or even human remains. Evidence from the textbook includes, specific time and events that occurred. With evidence from found bodies in and on centration camps, stated that as early as 1933 the Nazi party took steps in imprisonment, execution, banishment and other forms to cleanse its nation of the people Hitler deemed as unwanted. It is proven to be true from the fact that the Nuremburg law was proclaimed which was set out to dispose of the Jews.
Accusations of the mass killings were disputed for the fact that investigators claim that the hair of the prisoners was cut off in relation to hygienic reasoning, such as lice, which was causing typhus. These claims and beliefs of the investigators come from there being no proof as to when these samples were from. In their argument, …show more content…
The revisionists did not try to prove or disprove their claims in any way but by word of mouth. They were using nonscientific behavior, and therefore their theories could not be proven true or untrue. During the time of the so-called gas chambers, or extermination camps, it is said that for three years’ trains took these Jews to death without people noticing, and one researcher went to visit this camp, but there was no possibility that claim could be true, and that a train carrying that mass number of people would stay hidden without people noticing. The findings made up by the investigators led them to truly believe that specific events in the holocaust did not occur. Other reasons for the skepticism, was again that there was no hard, strong evidence to prove the claims they were making. There was some testimony in the trials, however it was all based on oral testimony, rather than scientific evidence, or even human remains. Evidence from the textbook includes, specific time and events that occurred. With evidence from found bodies in and on centration camps, stated that as early as 1933 the Nazi party took steps in imprisonment, execution, banishment and other forms to cleanse its nation of the people Hitler deemed as unwanted. It is proven to be true from the fact that the Nuremburg law was proclaimed which was set out to dispose of the Jews.