I believe this is evident as Lucius does not execute the “chief architect and plotter of… woes” (5.3.121) but instead pronounces that he will be “breast-deep in earth and famish[ed]” (5.3.1178). I believe this is problematic as he defies death and serving justice for his crimes within the action of the play, Aaron escapes punishment for his crimes. Moreover, the problem of defying retributive justice is reinforced further through Aaron and his “first-born son and heir” (4.2.91). Upon his discovery of the child, Lucius swears that the baby will “live and… [be] nourished” (5.1.60); thus I believe this is problematic as the child enables Aaron to defy justice and punishment. For instance, even though it is implied Aaron will die outside the Roman realm of the text, the child remains within this world which suggests a continuation of Aaron’s bloodline and his desire for revenge against the Andronici
I believe this is evident as Lucius does not execute the “chief architect and plotter of… woes” (5.3.121) but instead pronounces that he will be “breast-deep in earth and famish[ed]” (5.3.1178). I believe this is problematic as he defies death and serving justice for his crimes within the action of the play, Aaron escapes punishment for his crimes. Moreover, the problem of defying retributive justice is reinforced further through Aaron and his “first-born son and heir” (4.2.91). Upon his discovery of the child, Lucius swears that the baby will “live and… [be] nourished” (5.1.60); thus I believe this is problematic as the child enables Aaron to defy justice and punishment. For instance, even though it is implied Aaron will die outside the Roman realm of the text, the child remains within this world which suggests a continuation of Aaron’s bloodline and his desire for revenge against the Andronici