You make some pretty bold statements in your response to Randy's comment. Do you have any reasonable proof or sources that would back up your assertion that "the media supported the will of one man with no regards to the future."? You also state that it was for a false cause (WMDs), what are your reasons for saying that? These are very bold statements with nothing to back them up. I hate to say it Martin but, your bias is
You make some pretty bold statements in your response to Randy's comment. Do you have any reasonable proof or sources that would back up your assertion that "the media supported the will of one man with no regards to the future."? You also state that it was for a false cause (WMDs), what are your reasons for saying that? These are very bold statements with nothing to back them up. I hate to say it Martin but, your bias is