Response To Crisis

in this chapter discusses response scientists how to deal with the crisis is happening, so this is a response to the crisis was scientists is resistance and stratagem which do scientists to anomlia that brings them into crisis.
So scientists are still maintaining their paradigms without becomes and also
Scientists create some temporary modification of their theories to eliminate any conflict it seems. They will create a lot of articulation and modifications. Epistemological replacement it is a minor annoyance that happened because the new science emerging analysis and different which they would no longer be a source of trouble. so according to Thomas Khun "rejection of science to be replaced with another job is the only type of rejection of the paradigm that can be caused by in place. When the first paradigm used to look upon nature have been found, no one called the absence of research paradigm altogether. Refuse a paradigm without at once replace it with the other is rejecting science itself. Such action is not reflected on the paradigm, but rather on that person. …show more content…
so in this chapter So in this chapter tells the story of science in normal congestion criteria and does not depend on the traffic congestion that followed the revolution. attitude taken scientists in the face anomaly Friday or crisis is taking a different attitude with retaining their padradigma and more and more competitive as well as the articulation of an expression of their dissatisfaction is a symptom of the transition that will lead to a special