Oscar Wilde Concept Of Respect Essay

Good Essays
As famously written by Oscar Wilde, “Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike.” The concept of respect serves as a basis for my personal moral foundation; explicitly, regard others in the manner you wish to receive, respect the viewpoints and decisions of others, and refrain from constructing prior judgements of those you come across. The ultimate moral trial commences in the presence of immorality. Your success is determined by your counter reaction to disrespect. How do you respond to such treatment when nothing but your personal standards are on the line? Furthermore, how are you assumed to genuinely regard another with respect without an attempt to further understand or empathize? Perspective is the key to grasp the …show more content…
How you respond to disrespect in everyday life is a proper test of morality. In this test, you’re graded based on your ability to counter improper treatment with respect for no purpose other than its moral correctness. Additionally, the possibility of respecting another individual is obsolete without attempting to visualize their perspective. Understanding one another is the key to mutual respect as well as broadening your moral knowledge. Lastly, uninformed perceptions of others defeat all attempts to respect them as it doesn’t allow for the understanding or empathy of our cohorts. As humans, we continue to battle this natural urge to unknowingly define someone without any insight into their moral decision making, hindering our mental and moral growth. “Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people whom we personally dislike.” My personal interpretation of this Oscar Wilde quote is directly linked to respect and its moral relevance. The essence of morality is our reaction to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    How is it that people are to follow through with something without considering the consequences? Immanuel Kant argues that we as people should not act for reasons because if we do, we will be self-contradicting ourselves. He believes that we are being morally irrelevant if we base are wrong doings or right doings with consequences before we choose to do the action. He believes we should be willing to accomplish our duties and tasks without worrying about the aftermath of an action. Kant believes it should be a requirement for us to obey the moral law because it is a noble thing to do.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He believes that wrong doing only hurts the person of wrong doing and that no individual tries to hurt themselves. This implies it is incomprehensible for an individual to enthusiastically do wrong on the grounds that their impulse for self-intrigue keeps them from doing as such. This is a remarkable proclamation that strikes…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant believes that every person has rights and their own autonomy, so lying to them is treating them as a mere thing. There is no valid reason to lie about this action other than the fact Pat most likely regrets it, and fears losing Chris. Therefore, this maxim cannot be applied as a universal law, because it is rationally incoherent to make a maxim a law that is based off of self-interest. Since it cannot be applied universally, and telling Chris the truth would have greater moral worth, it is concluded that according to Kant’s Categorical Imperative Pat should tell Chris that she cheated out of respect and to follow her duty to him as his significant…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People don’t like being judged, which results in people not taking responsibility for their actions. I disagree with how Fromm relies on the comparison of our options to our humanistic conscious, morals and the laws of humanity to guide our actions. What if our values are subpar? If someone has little to no morality and believes that he is bettering the future of humanity with his actions, then according to Fromm’s logic, they have justified themselves by obeying their personal morals and how they interpreted the laws of humanity. This could mean that a seral killer felt that his actions were justified as an act of freedom against authority.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant's Morality Of Lying

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For Kant, lying is always wrong. It does not matter the situation someone is, as long as someone does the right thing for the sake of duty. However, there are paternalistic lies, which are lies that human being uses for protecting other people’s lives. Kant thinks if we do so, we are taking away their human rights. He says that lying affects our “intrinsic worth”, would threat people as a mean and not as an end, and would hurt people’s feeling.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nietzsche condemned sound rationalists like Kant for their objectivism. He was a relativist and expressed that nothing could be known with assurance. He did not accept that supreme truth, from the earlier learning, interminable thoughts or extreme reality which was focal ideas for the Kant 's teachings have ever existed. Nietzsche did not have faith in Kant 's Categorical Imperative (Foundation of Morals) thinking of them as simple reflections. He considered the time spend on looking for the endless truth a unimportant exercise in futility as it led individuals far from the most imperative thing which reality.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This is because it is based on what the reasonable man finds acceptable for a community to tolerate. With this theory of how morality comes about would allow prejudice and disdain to run our society. Dworkin argues a different way of determining what is immoral for society and believes that emotion is not the way to run our society. Justification beyond what is acceptable for the community is how Dworkin argues how deciding what immorality is should come about. These justifications cannot come from prejudice.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Human beings are rational creatures that would intensitivity defend themselves. A Human Being would have no reason to place tolerance toward someone else 's morals over their own safety. For example society deems it immoral to kill other people but will deem it as an understandable action if it was done to protect oneself. The undermining of moral confidence that relativism can cause serves only to ensure that people do not approach a situation believing that they are morally superior but rather approach it with an open mind. Moreover, it is not clear people are less motivated about non-universal values beliefs.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deontology Theory

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It also tells us that we can never use humans as a means to an end, but consider them as unique creatures with human dignity. And finally on categorical imperatives, it dictates us to treat other people as we ought to be treated. Therefore to sum all these we found the collection of social media data, violates the moral law in that the exercise don’t apply morals in both situations. The exercise only focuses on safety and to criminalize somebody, but not considering the innocents and their privacy. The action of collecting social media data is definitely treating people’s information as a means to an end.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The second formulation is the ‘Principle of Ends not Means’, it works on the basis that all people are equal and therefore it is wrong to exploit others or use them for personal benefits. This formulation shows how Kant had a respect for the value of humans, which is obviously important for an ethical theory; Kant believed that all people were an end in themselves. It also displays the importance of intention. You shouldn’t carry out an act that you know will treat someone as just a means, even if it benefits a greater good (contrast to utilitarianism). Kant thought that through helping others gain happiness (not treating them as just means) we also developed our own moral perfection- this also links in with Kant’s desire for a better society overall.…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays

Related Topics