Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

Improved Essays
Henry David Thoreau, born July 12, 1817 in Concord, Massachusetts, was known to be an American transcendentalist and philosopher. Thoreau became known for the essay he wrote when he spent a night in jail due to his refusal to pay taxes in objection to slavery and the Mexican War. The essay was published and titled “Resistance of Civil Government” but also known as “Civil Disobedience.” It is unsurprising that the government is dirty and corrupt so the purpose of the essay was to influence readers to not fear but protest government laws and commands or vote them out.
Thoreau’s opinion of the government is "That government is best which governs least" (Thoreau 964). Thoreau wanted the government to protect the people, to do for the people, but
…show more content…
Wood insist the essay was a narrative and dramatic essay which caused critics to think his work was out of proportion and uninteresting. Wood thinks his focus and accomplish was too dramatic and narrative form, yet his work lacked the message to his essay on being a truly self-reliant man. Wood and other critics expected to read and get the message with more supporting details on civil disobedience rather than his experience and thoughts. Thoreau offered encouragement to the individual’s rights, to withdraw any support from a government whose policies are evil. He was such a moral thinker, did not fear possible consequences of civil disobedience against injustice. The message was to be self-reliant and follow your heart, withhold taxes to deprive the State of its resources and maybe in the future the people will see a change and the government will lose the ability to continue such immoral …show more content…
Thoreau’s night in jail was considered free rather than confined. He describes his night in prison novel like and interesting. The prisoners enjoyed chats and evening air as he entered the jail. He was placed in one of the neatest cells that was apartment like and furnished. “One night in jail was not much in the way of such an action; in fact, it lacked the second condition of such an act altogether, viz., the appeal to the people from themselves” (Cavell 399). The result to Thoreau’s night in jail was due to he did not want to pay the tax because he believed it was to support the Mexican War. To Cavell it seems having spent a night in jail was not enough to support his argument, but to Thoreau it meant a lot, in fact he believed a place for a true just man was to be imprisoned rather than be part of a corrupt State, as both would serve to the same

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Transcendentalism was a movement in mid-nineteenth century America that focused on an individual obtaining personal freedom from the constrictions of their surrounding society. Thus, it can be said that they pushed for social and political change to be achieved so that individualism would be prized over collectivism. Two writers, Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, are at the frontline of these Transcendentalist views. These authors introduce a similar twist to the concept of personal freedom, claiming that a person can achieve it by encompassing oneself into nature.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry D. Thoreau’s non-violent protest of not paying his poll tax may not have made a huge impact on society during 1846 when he took his stand for what he believed in, however, his stand would end up becoming a huge inspiration during the 60s and 70s. July of 1846 Henry D. Thoreau was arrested for not paying his poll tax for the last 4 years. (Brooks) Thoreau believed this poll tax helped support the Mexican-American war and the expansion of slavery into the southwest (Brooks); both of which he strongly disagreed with. He wanted to make a public statement of his refusal to support an unjust war and slavery itself and when asked by a friend who visited him in jail as to why he didn’t pay his tax his response was, “The question is not what am I doing in here, but what are you doing out there?” (The Power of…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thoreau was able to convey his thoughts in his work, "Civil Disobedience. " Thoreau believed his writing could persuade the general public to understand his comings. All of the author's works was treason and a criminal offense but there was a higher calling. They have devoted their life to matters much bigger than themselves.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong. He claims the public must rely on their morals, and conscience to stand up to a government that does not rely on morals and…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues in “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” that the government no longer does what it was created to do; subjects people to follow and support its decisions, without necessarily informing people of their choice; and limits the freedoms people have in society. Thoreau wants to convince his readers to begin thinking and living in the manner he does. His arguments ultimately lead his audience to experience feelings of injustice, and want to become more involved in deciding how they are governed through the use of civil…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His protege Henry David Thoreau is best known for his works “Civil Disobedience” and Walden. “Civil Disobedience” revolutionized the overall American belief system. Thoreau professed every individual’s right to defy unjust laws, and made key points that people did not have to blindly follow the government or laws. However, he also made it clear that every individual had to be prepared for whatever consequences were to follow these actions (“Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau). In the quote “Yet…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dear, Mr.Thoreau I am writing to you to express my opinion on your job application. As I have heard you seem to fail at most things in your life. For example you have failed as a teacher and failed to find love, as I see the only thing you have going for you is you graduated from harvard. Also you are living off of someone else's pond and land. Here at our publishing firm of the government we hold people to higher expectations than that.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He also uses imagery in order to persuade the reader of his idea. He also stated that the citizens must be sentient to the laws they obey and disobey. It is up to every man to decide based on his own moral standards and ethics what law he deemed unrespectable; he also accomplishes appealing to human consciousness over logic. Thoreau also writes, "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself"(Thoreau).It can interpreted to if you don’t believe in what the government is doing as being appropriate, you should disobey that government even if the final consequences is that the government won’t protect your rights…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. define the profound difference between just and unjust in their writings, “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” and “Letter from a Birmingham Jail.” While the two men have a different sound throughout each of their own pieces, there is much that they agree upon about civil disobedience once clearly thought out and read. With that being said, this paper will, respectively, discuss the general content of both writings, as well as the prominent similarities and differences noticeable in the two pieces. An example of political/cultural problems the United States is facing today that emulate civil disobedience will also be presented that link to both pieces. Towards the end of this paper, I intend…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peacefully resisting a national law impacts a free society, but depending on the situation, it can be a positive or a negative impact. In "Civil Disobedience" by Henry David Thoreau, he expresses his belief that "government is best when governs least". That is a hard concept to follow, though, considering many citizens of the U.S struggle to conform to the laws we have currently. I would agree that a limited government is extremely necessary, but to have no rules at all is dangerous. If I were to turn on the news at this moment, I would see thousands of protesters against President-Elect Donald Trump.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He wrote about civil disobedience in his 1849 work, “ Civil Disobedience.” There, he questions why would people obey the government if they believe the laws are unjust. As a result of his disobedience, Thoreau went to jail in 1846. This did not impact greatly the abolition of slavery. However, it was a start.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason for his quarrel with the government and the writing of Civil Disobedience was Thoreau’s refusal to pay taxes supporting slavery, getting him thrown in jail, but keeping his conscious clear. Thoreau believed that each man should act in a way that agreed with their morals and not that of the government, especially if the government makes you violate your core beliefs…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much like Paine, Thoreau would not be bullied into violating what he believed to be right. Thoreau was also vehemently against slavery, something else he wrote about in Civil Disobedience. “There are thousands who are in opinion opposed to slavery and to the war, who yet in effect do nothing to put an end to them.” (1865) This could also be seen as a critique of society.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thoreau’s essay is also different from King’s because he presents more than one goal. Not only does he describe the government’s unfair laws, but he also teaches his readers how and why to revolt, and tells them to bring an end to the ongoing Mexican War. Despite these differences, both Thoreau and King share strong similar beliefs of morality and justice that are clearly seen throughout the entirety of both essays. Both authors in their respective essays tell the people why and how they should fight for justice. They explain that in order to fight for justice, we must first distinguish between the just and unjust laws.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It promotes prioritizing one 's consciousness over the law since government should be based upon conscience. He largely criticized the American social institutions and policies of the time, predominantly slavery and the Mexican American war, and in protest refused to pay his poll taxes. His justification was that if the government refused to improve their flawed manners then “"It is not a man 's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong” but it is “his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and...not to give it practically his support.” Thoreau exposes how government is an expedient which solely exists because the people have allowed this body to execute their will, though it is not immune to misuse. Government is meant to protect individual freedoms and so when these are infringed upon, man 's obligation is to ideologically detach himself from it.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays