They argue that instead of taking the time to create development programs, organizations should treat immediate humanitarian aid needs. By not immediately addressing needs, MSF argues that lives are being compromised. The article claims that it is counterproductive to “... [offer] support to local health structures that could do the job instead, even if it means delays in epidemic control and overall less children protected” (Whittall and Hofman 2). Lastly, MSF argues that there is no evidence that the concept of resilience is more effective in preventing crises in the future and claims it is mostly an appealing political concept. Overall, the article argues to just leave humanitarian aid and development in separate
They argue that instead of taking the time to create development programs, organizations should treat immediate humanitarian aid needs. By not immediately addressing needs, MSF argues that lives are being compromised. The article claims that it is counterproductive to “... [offer] support to local health structures that could do the job instead, even if it means delays in epidemic control and overall less children protected” (Whittall and Hofman 2). Lastly, MSF argues that there is no evidence that the concept of resilience is more effective in preventing crises in the future and claims it is mostly an appealing political concept. Overall, the article argues to just leave humanitarian aid and development in separate