Research Paper On The Compromise Of 1850

Improved Essays
Compromise of 1850 The Compromise of 1850 has five laws that were passed in September to deal with slavery. The United States were expanding westward. California and Texas were states that had just been created. Utah and New Mexico were on their way to becoming states too. The concern with the new territories was that they would upset the balance in the senate regarding slavery. At the same time, tensions between the North and South grew. “Senator Henry Clay introduced a series of resolutions on January 29, 1850 in an attempt to seek a compromise and avert a crisis between the North and South.” It was called a compromise because attempted to give both parties of congress something they wanted. The representatives from the North received California …show more content…
This was important to the North because it shifted the balance of representatives in Congress to their favor. After the US-Mexico war the territory of California was controlled by the military. The gold rush caused an increase in population by people from all over the country and even from foreign lands. Because so many people were there, a stronger local government was needed, as well as support from a federal government. California applied to be accepted to the United States. They were accepted, but the Compromise of 1850 did not allow them to practice slavery. The second resolution was about the organization of southwest territories without addressing slavery. The land and the territories of Utah and New Mexico were organized. An important part of the bill was that these new states could allow or not allow slavery depending on what the citizens wanted. The third was about the adjustment of the border of Texas and New Mexico. The territory known as Texas claimed a lot of land it never controlled. It was the largest territory and at the time was the largest state. It entered the union as a slave state. Before it joined as a state, the Republic of Texas had accrued a lot of debt. As part of the Compromise of 1850, the US government paid Texas ten million dollars in exchange of land it gained during the Mexican American war. The third resolution also set the current borders …show more content…
This was not enough of a compromise for either side. The abolitionists who were fighting to end slavery in the capital were not satisfied. The south did not like the idea of slavery being illegal in the capital. They feared it would spread to the South. This was an attempt to “meet in the middle”. It had uninteded consequences, however.
“As the nation’s capital moved from Philadelphia to Washington DC in 1800 more slaves were needed to build the infrastructure required for the new capital. Alexandria became one of the largest slave trade markets in the US with Franklin & Armfield becoming the largest slave trading companies in the country. The city became a depot for newly arrived slaves on their way to southern lands where their labor would be used in plantations. As a result of the outlaw in slave trade Alexandria, a city that flourished on slave trade, decided to separate from DC and joint the State of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Analysis

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It established the 36°30; a latitude-longitude boundary that prohibited further slave states North of the Missouri border. This irritated southern states since they wanted to spread slavery up North and the compromise prohibited them from doing so. Then in 1860, Abraham Lincoln was elected President of the U.S. The only problem, Lincoln was an anti-slave man. This pushed the southerners over the edge, and one by one southern states seceded from the Union (U.S.) and formed the Confederacy, including Texas.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry Clay came up with the Compromise of 1850, and it was passed with the help of Senator Stephen Douglas. This compromise allowed Utah to become either a free or slave state depending on popular sovereignty, banned slave markets from Washington D.C., and allowed the Tougher Fugitive Slave Act to pass. It was a considerably even win for all, since both the northerners and southerners got a piece of what they wanted. The dispute over slavery in new territories was settled yet again for that time…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A). Although the Compromise of 1850, devised by Henry Clay, seemed to satisfy the states, it allowed slavery to exist above the 36’30’ line which had previously been defined by the Missouri Compromise in 1820. With Popular Sovereignty being one of the Compromise of 1850’s main focuses, states north of the 36’30’ line could now be admitted as slave states shall they choose to do so. Although the Compromise of 1850 seemed to…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The years following 1850 proved to be a time of political turmoil in the United States. With slavery still being utilized in the South, it seemed that the Northern and Southern politicians would always be at odds. This opposition would always exist between the North and South so long as slavery existed. During the period preceding the Compromise of 1850 politicians were able to formulate compromises that barely appeased both sides. Eventually there was nothing else to do to satisfy both sides of the country.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Compromise of 1850 stated the California would enter as a free state, but Utah and New Mexico would also enter and determine if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty of the residents; both were declared as free states (doc 5). The Fugitive Slave Act also came into existence because of the Compromise of 1850; something in favor of the south, if it would have been enforced. The North ignored the Fugitive Slave Act and freed escaped slaves. As if the Southern and Northern states couldn't disagree more, the Dred Scott decision drew them even more apart and pushed the south a little closer to secession (doc 7). In 1854, Stephen Douglas introduces the Kansas-Nebraska Act which then creates Kansas and Nebraska territories and they again are decided if they are slave or free territories by popular sovereignty (doc 6).…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Later on new president James Polk came and started war with Mexico to get Texas. In document (4) the Massachusetts legislature opposed the annexation of Texas, because the war was being fought to extend…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    There needed to be a determination if the territory would allow slavery or be declared free. Jointly, there were talks of provisions to allow the inhabitants to decide for themselves. 2.) California had grown tremendously reversing the gold rush…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the quest for more land, Congress and the presidents ran into some political issues that had to be taken care of. The United States wanted to expand west, but they couldn’t do that without taking or buying land from Native Americans that were there before them. They needed to purchase lands that would make it possible for trade routes. During this time, the States were in need for someone to help them Compromise. Congress and the presidents responded to the people using Manifest Destiny, Congress created the Missouri Compromise, and the Compromise of 1850.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It stated that (for the North) California was to be admitted as a free stare, which also set off the “balance” of slave-to-non-slave sates, slave trade was to be prohibited in Washington D.C., and that Texas would lose the boundary dispute with New Mexico. In other words, the south got no slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico territories, slaveholding permitted in Washington D.C., Texas would get 10 million dollars, and the Fugitive Slave Law (authorized local governments to capture and return escaped slaves to their owners and had imposed penalties on anyone who aided in the slave’s flight) would be passed. The Fugitive Slave Law caused the most controversy, however. Though both the North and South benefited from the Compromise of 1850, the Compromise seemed to favor the North. This infuriated the…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Passed by Congress in may of 1854, the Kansas Nebraska Act may be the most significant of the Pre-Civil War compromises. It admitted the Kansas and Nebraska as states, but rather than decide whether the territories would become slave or non-slave states based on their location in relation to the 36’ 30° line, they were allowed to choose for themselves. Kansas and Nebraska were not the only ones allowed to decide though, each territory was allowed to choose for itself if it would be a slave or non-slave state. This allowing of territories to choose slave or non-slave is called popular sovereignty. In popular sovereignty the people of the territory vote to decide if they will become a slave state or a non-slave state.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This though had nothing to do with actual slavery laws, this compromise was actually done to bring the south and north together to finish the Constitution. Later on though the Fugitive Slave Law was added, and forbid new slaves in the new states, but also stated that if slaves were to runaway that they would be returned. Some historians believe though that without this compromise our country could have gone in a different direction, separating the north and the south who would form their own countries and maybe even sparing the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. This did though eventually lead to the civil war and was one of the major contributors in starting the war to end slavery. Before the end though they still had to discuss the ins and outs of the slave trade, and if slaves were property and allowed to be taxed.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays