The famous discussion of nature vs. nurture was somewhat interrupted by the realization that both aspects, genetics and environment, have important input in individuals. By combining the studies of genetics and psychology it is possible to correlate results from the fields and search for possible, and hopefully specific, genes involved in the expression of certain traits. For instance, Poulin et al (2011) explored the relationship between receptor genes of oxytocin and vasopressin and prediction of prosocial behavior. In this particular study, Poulin et al (2011) intended to “examine whether oxytocin and vasopressin interact with threat to predict prosocial behavior outside the contexts of the laboratory and close relationships” by examining…
Murderers: Nature vs. Nurture The nature vs. nurture debate helps researchers explain ones actions based on either their genetic traits or based on how they were raised. The nature side offers an explanation for the persons inherited genetic traits to help explain their actions such as how they behavior especially at a younger age. The nurture part helps give one an explanation to how a person behaves or acts based on the environmental factors that person was raised in and how society could have “created them”. This argument can be presented in the Clutter family murder on whether the murderers, Dick and Perry, were influenced by nature or nurture factors.…
Medical Daily writer, Dana Dovey, journalist of Nature vs. Nurture Debate: 50-Year Twin Study Proves It Takes Two To Determine Human Traits, has written that “A culmination of more than half a century of research collected on 14.5 million pairs of twins has finally concluded that the nature versus nurture debate is a draw” (Dovey). In other words, Dana Dovey restates Dr. Beben Benyamin’s research that nurture (environment) and nature (genes) both play an equal role in deciding one’s personality. The nurture v. nature controversy is one of the most everlasting altercations in the area of the study of the mind. Advocates of the nature theory trust that foreordained hereditary qualities at last direct the main part of one's identity and choices.…
Smith, Stephanie 06/15/2017 Comprehensive Exams: Theory Question __1__ Nature versus Nurture There has been a debate that has long been discussed between social theorist and criminologist. That discussion focuses on whether a person is born with traits that make them commit criminal acts or has nature, the environment, caused the person to become a criminal. This debate is about nature (genetic factors) versus nurture (social learning) and its focus on an individual’s choices they make in their life, either good or bad.…
The often debated concept of Nature vs. Nurture has in recent years become less of a polarizing topic. With advancements in psychology and biology, the factors that go in to the etiology of certain disorders and diseases have become more clear, but also less clearly distinct from one another. The lines between what is caused by environmental factors or by biological factors are becoming more and more blurred. In particular, social anxiety acts as an excellent example of how these factors can become intermixed to create the symptomology of a disorder. It has become clear to modern scientists that social anxiety disorder results from a complex interplay between environmental and biological factors.…
The phrase Nature vs Nurture, is something that many parents debate about. Will my child develop anxiety because my husband and I suffer from it? The answer for this varies dependent on how exposed this child might be to anxiety, but that does not guarantee that the child will not inherit certain social anxieties. I have actually seen this with my husband, because he suffers from anxiety. You can physically see his anxiety due to sweats and pale look in his face anytime we go out in public.…
Dr. Bruce Lipton, an American developmental biologist who is widely known for promoting the idea that genes and DNA can be manipulated by a person’s environmental factors and personal beliefs, once said, “Genes load the gun, but environment pulls the trigger.” The debate of Nature versus Nurture has been a timeless controversy over whether or not Nature, in reference “to all of the genes and hereditary factors that influence who we are- from our physical appearance to our personality characteristics” (Cherry), or Nurture, “refers to all of the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture” (Cherry). In Barbara Kingsolver's…
Who are you? It’s a difficult and complicated question. The first thing that usually comes to mind is personality, then maybe ethnicity and culture, and then family, etc. What we often forget is our genes, segments of chromosomes that decide what we look like, how our bodies functions, and even traits like intelligence, aggression, and addictive behavior. However, there is a lot of debate about whether genes can really give us traits like intelligence, aggression, and others when our environment has so much to do with who we are.…
My passion is in how individuals function within the clockwork of society, by studying the behaviour of individuals has encouraged my interest to study both society and crime and how they interconnect. Psychology and criminology will allow for me to further expand my interest in these two areas. The highly popular debate on whether a criminal is created through "nature or nurture" has sparked my interest as I believe that there are many underlying factors that go into making a ‘criminal’ and labels that are given to individuals can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy. Personally, the nurture argument is more favourable but arguably nature does play some part as Fuller’s study ‘Black girls in London’ has demonstrated that the labels given are merely just a social construction.…
The controversial debate remains on which of the two has the greatest influence on one’s behavior and development. Despite the debate, it is true that both have large impacts. After looking backing on my childhood, I do believe that nurture has had the greatest impact on my life. My behaviors and accomplishments, are the result of the environment in which I grew up in. I do believe that there’s truth in the saying “That’s just the nature of the beast”.…
Throughout the years people have debated the effects that nature and nurture have had on the development, education, and personality of a person. Although many people believe that both nature and nurture take part in the development of a person, I believe that the main factor of a person’s development comes from nurture. One highly debated source for the argument of nature versus nurture is through the creature in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein. The concept of nature versus nurture has been wildly debated through many ways, including Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, a novel in which shows the difference of nature versus nurture on the outcome of someone’s education and behavior.…
Nature vs Nurture has a been a debate in our history for an exceedingly long time. This arguement challenges the idea of whether your identity is based on your genetics or your environment, otherwise known as nature vs nurture. The difference of having blue eyes and having a cousin with green eyes is most likely a genetic trait. However, if you are a confident person and your cousin is not, is that due to their genetics or their environment? Numerous studies have been done attempting to answer this striking question, many involving identical twins.…
Introduction From the first breath we breathe we take the last breath of life, we are constantly changing and developing. The life span development is a process of how humans grow and change throughout their daily lives. However, the human development is instantly related to the principles that drive the life span development while being able to manage the long term substance.…
Introduction The argument of nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and one of the largest controversies on whether our influences come from our genes (nature) or environmental factors (nurture), and how it could affect our behavioral, appearances, development, and our personality. These two play a big role in the human development. This argument will always exist on what is said about the human development. Scientists have not been able to sort this argument out and decide which one rules out the other.…
The controversy of nature versus nurture has been an active debate among the psychological community for decades. Nature, a side of this debate, is defined by the genetic code of a human, which utilizes DNA and biological connections in order to accurately demonstrate the importance of the development of a human being. The aspect of nature specifically centers on features that are innate. For instance, our genetic make-up, unchanging attributes, and physical predispositions are examples of factors that nature examines during the development of a person. Nature plays a major role when it comes to understanding the motives and views behind a serial killer.…