Republican Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
The republicans wanted to keep the national government small while insisting on supporting the state right and a strict interpretation of the constitution instead of a strong central government. As well as leaving most of the power to the states and to the people. Believing that the people are responsible enough to make good decisions concerning their country. The federalist primary goal was to maintain order and structure by favoring a strong national government and the people’s right. Jefferson feared that the federalist might wipe out the freedom of speech and press by saying “It would swallow up all the delegated powers, and reduce the whole to one power, as before observed”. They believed that a powerful central government posed a threat

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were very different political parties. One example is that Federalists thought the public office should be ruled by educated men who owned property and would protect rights. According to the textbook on page 292 it states, "Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.". Although the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a few people controlling a strong central government. The textbook states on page 292, "In contrast, the Republicans feared a strong central government controlled by a few people".…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalist for having support for the Constitution followed what happened through the signing of the Constitution. During the Constitutional Convention the Constitution was signed(Document 6). The vote came to be 187 to 168 . It established the national government of America, fundamental laws, and guaranteed rights for citizens. Both political parties were worried about things stated in the Constitution.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the Democratic-Republicans told about how uncentralized the United States would be if they were under the federal during Adams's presidency. Republicans' agreed that they wanted to expand of the U.S. army and navy, undertake on individual rights in the Alien and Sedition Acts, and new taxes and decrease the spending money used to support many of the federal actions that were being done. The main thing the Federalists wanted was a strong federal authority to prevent the extras of popular majorities, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to take away majority of the national authority so that the people could rule more through state governments and let it be brought to one as a whole…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “We honor our past because it shapes our future,” this is one of the many quotes that Otterbein University holds dearly. Otterbein University holds this value greatly. Otterbein gives equality to all students, faculty, and others since 1847. Before any women’s rights and the abolishment of slavery, Otterbein University allowed people of color and women to receive a fair and equal education. Otterbein University is a mid-sized college located in Westerville, Ohio.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republicans feared the the government would gain too much power while the Federalist craved a strong government to help the nation. Congress passed…

    • 1029 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newly attained independence upon the denouement of the Revolution, provoked fierce debate concerning the proper governmental path. America was divided into two factions: Federalists and Republicans. James Madison in unison with his fellow federalists pursued a centralized government and ratification of the Constitution. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 assembled to address the increasingly overt weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists wanted a more centralized government, favored the Bill of Rights, Separation of Powers which made 3 equal branches of government, judicial, executive, and legislative. The Anti-Federalists believed in states’ rights and states’…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the ratification of the Constitution of 1787, the Articles of Confederation gave most of the power to the states. However, the Federalists wanted the national government to hold the majority of the power and not the states. They were in favor of limiting the power of the states. They did not believe a Bill of Rights was necessary because the state constitutions should protect the individual rights. Federalists believed that the best way to protect their rights was through a large republic.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the 1800s Thomas Jefferson, the leader of the republicans, created the party in order to oppose the economic and foreign policies of the Federalist Party who is led by Alexander Hamilton. To me if I was in the position to choose I would most definitely pick the republicans. Thomas Jefferson and the republicans was the best side because their interest was the people, a strict government and the Louisiana Purchase was a major event. The republicans was not in favor of a strong central government unlike the federalists. Thomas Jefferson and the republican’s interests was the people.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dividing the parties almost completely in half were two groups with called the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists were more for a weak central government and more power to individual states, also their biggest argument was for a Bill of Rights. Now on the other hand the Federalists wanted a stronger central government and were against a Bill of Rights because they believed the government would give them rights. The Anti-Federalists main argument for a Bill of Rights was that there were certain rights that were guaranteed to people that the government should not infringe upon.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalists vs Anti-Federalists After the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the weak Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution. It was turned over to the states for approval and for some it brought back fears and memories of King George, while for others it fixed the problems of the Articles of Confederation. Upon completion of it’s writing, a debate was started concerning ratification. Some people believed that the Constitution gave too much power to a central government while others thought it was a great step forward and necessary for the future of the U.S.A. The Federalists were those who were for the Constitution and the Anti-Federalists were those against it. Both sides argued that their way was correct.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1787, the Continental Congress was brought together in the Philadelphia Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution was written and since people had different views on how to interpret it, two political parties were eventually formed: The federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. The main reason for the rise of political parties during the 1790s was because each of the parties favored different political and economical reforms needed as a new, developing country. Alexander Hamilton led the Federalists and they favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, while Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican Party favored strict interpretation. The Federalists wanted to create a national economy by creating…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    During the period of 1801 through 1817, the conflict of the Democratic-Republican views on the constitution were arguing against the ideas of the Federalists. The two parties believed in completely different ideas of how to interpret the constitution. Although the parties knew they must come to some agreement in how the constitution should be interpreted they both had some very good reasons there party was correct. The Democratic-Republicans believed in interpreting the constitution exactly.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays