Canada and the United States are both a representative democracy although they classify themselves differently. In Canada, our democracy is known as a Constitutional Monarchy or Federal Parliamentary Democracy. While in the United States they classify themselves as a Republic. Equally to an extent, they are similar as they are both a federal state and categorize under a system known as a representative democracy. In a democracy, the government listens to the will of people by satisfying the need and wants of individuals. Essentially, a representative democracy advocates the values of a democracy as well by promoting and reflecting the will of people. Under a representative democracy, individuals are given the opportunity to elect representatives
…show more content…
These are the two simple factors that differentiate both the different styles of governing in two different countries. As mentioned, these two nations have different ways to approaching the will of people under their democracy. Although in the United States, the president does not have the ability to introduce a bill or defend it, he/she has the ability to veto against the bills even when it is passed by both houses. Unlike Canada where it is mandatory that the government introduces the bill, defends the bill and answers daily questions. The Prime Minister does not have absolute power like the President in which he/she can veto a bill – he/she must seek approval from the House of Commons. With the approval from the House of Commons, bills can be passed to which it is conventional to the interest of the will of people. In the view of the fact that both of these systems of governing is different, it is a point that Canada seeks ways to appeal to the interest of individuals. Furthermore, their system of voting is different as well. …show more content…
However, the leading difference between the two is the prominent factors of how many terms a government can serve and the conditions. Despite the fact that voters in the United States can express their discontent with their President by voting against the President – it is very unlikely that situation can change. Presidents most of the time in the United States serve for a full four years. While in Canada, when the majority of House of Commons reject the bills
These are the two simple factors that differentiate both the different styles of governing in two different countries. As mentioned, these two nations have different ways to approaching the will of people under their democracy. Although in the United States, the president does not have the ability to introduce a bill or defend it, he/she has the ability to veto against the bills even when it is passed by both houses. Unlike Canada where it is mandatory that the government introduces the bill, defends the bill and answers daily questions. The Prime Minister does not have absolute power like the President in which he/she can veto a bill – he/she must seek approval from the House of Commons. With the approval from the House of Commons, bills can be passed to which it is conventional to the interest of the will of people. In the view of the fact that both of these systems of governing is different, it is a point that Canada seeks ways to appeal to the interest of individuals. Furthermore, their system of voting is different as well. …show more content…
However, the leading difference between the two is the prominent factors of how many terms a government can serve and the conditions. Despite the fact that voters in the United States can express their discontent with their President by voting against the President – it is very unlikely that situation can change. Presidents most of the time in the United States serve for a full four years. While in Canada, when the majority of House of Commons reject the bills