Cogitans And Res Extensa Analysis

Improved Essays
René Descartes was a modern philosopher and was dualist. He wrote The Mediations of First Philosophy in 1641. In his arguments he expresses his believes of two substances, which are Res Cogitans and Res Extensa. He will also, give you arguments about how he concluded that god existed, and will use god in his argument to show how it is possible for corporeal things to exist, as well as introduce you the mind and body problem. Descartes will at one-point doubt everything, even his existence, which means he is willing to use hyperbolic thought. He does this because he is going after the indubitable truth. He puts his hyperbolic thought in action when he introduces the Dream Hypothesis and The Evil Demon Hypothesis in order to prove that the senses …show more content…
The primary qualities of Res Cogitans (thinking thing) are thinking and it is non-extended, and its secondary qualities are sense perception and imagination. Descartes reaches this conclusion by having a clear and distinct perception of the truth. He concluded that he has to exist as a soul even if he doesn’t exist physically, because in order to be able to have thought and be able to doubt, he has to at least exist as a thinking thing (Res Cogitans). Descartes comes to this conclusion by first introducing the Dream Hypothesis and the Evil Demon Hypothesis in meditation one. These two hypotheses are part of his use of hyperbolic thought. With the Dream Hypothesis he is thinking that maybe the only things that exist are our dreams. On the other hand, with the Evil Demon Hypothesis he is thinking that something malignant is influencing his thoughts and dreams. He identifies the Evil Demon as an entity that lies, and gives you false experiences, therefore, it allows him to doubt everything, even that 2+3 = 5. Secondly, in meditation two he starts doubting everything, even his existence. This leads him to the indubitable truth “Corgito ergo sum” which means “I think, therefore, I am”. When he concludes this, then he discovers that he exists as a soul/mind even if he doesn’t exist physically. (René Descartes,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I will then proceed to analyze the third meditation in which Descartes focuses on a causal argument for existence of God who is perfect. By the end of the third meditation, Descartes appears to prove that he is not God and that God exists. Descartes knows that he exists by the very fact of “cogito”. He cannot doubt that he exists because something cannot doubt or have awareness and not exist.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The purpose of Descartes’ argument of doubt is to encourage us to doubt the truth in everything. Some would argue that the doubt argument is not valid because its conclusion does not follow its premises. While this is a strong observation, it overlooks the three arguments Descartes’ used to strengthen his premise on doubt - perceptual illusion, the dream problem, and a deceiving god. In the first case, perceptual illusion illustrates that things are not always just as they seem and since we cannot all be sure about what is true and what is not, it is our best interest to doubt any sensory knowledge. The dream problem claims that it is possible to doubt any physical thing actually exists and that there is an external world.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation Two, Descartes…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He says in the first meditation he is doubtful about all the things he thinks he knows, and in the second meditation he states that he believes he exists when he thinks he exists. Descartes concluded that whatever he truly believes in clearly and distinctly therefore then must be…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the end of his doubting everything, the only thing Descartes are certain about is “I think, therefore I am”, this is known as “Cogito ergo sum” in Latin. Descartes argues that we may not actually have a physical body but what he is…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Renee Descartes False

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Renee Descartes writes on the uncertainty that he has of his memories and experiences in his paper titled “The Cogito”, which was written in 1643. The main focus of this paper is Descartes coming to terms that nothing is really certain other than the fact that Descartes himself exists and thinks. Descartes comes to this uncertainty since he believes that he has no reason to believe in any sense experience that he has. Descartes’ lack of belief of the external world is clear when he writes that he supposes “that all things [he] sees are false” (qtd. in Jacobsen 193).…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Meditations, Descartes attempts to give a firm theoretical basis of all knowledge on an individual’s rational capacities. Descartes’s dream argument and evil deceiver argument challenges an individual’s ability to know. He did not believe that our senses are necessarily accurate. The idea of perception that conveys accurate information is what he considered to be the very foundation. In the Dream argument, Descartes argues that while he’s asleep, he has perceptions about things that seem so real, but they are not.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’s argument for substance dualism stems from his famous one-liner, “I think, therefore I am.” In this statement, Descartes thinks and knows that he exists. He attributes his self, “I”, as being rooted in his mind, and he perceives his existence extended and apart from other things in his body, i.e. his body is not everything around him, but rather a biological machine extended in a certain amount of space. Descartes thinks that because a mind and body can be understood separate from each other that they can exist separate from each other, and that this idea is true because God is not a deceiver. This separation of mind and body is what Descartes focuses on in his argument for substance dualism.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Outline and critically discuss Descartes’ dreaming argument and evil demon argument Descartes’ presents two sceptical arguments as part of his hopes of laying a solid Epistemology based foundation on which the sciences can be built. While the arguments themselves are valid there are issues with Descartes’ logic both in the finer detail of what he writes and in the bigger picture of his arguments. The dreaming argument consists of a line of reasoning based on our lack of ability to firmly know whether or not we are asleep or awake. The formulation for Descartes’ argument goes as follows: 1.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Then concluded that if he is deceived then something must exist to be deceived and that the deceived is a “thinking thing” (Descartes L325). This conclusion was made through the evidence given by his process of methodical doubt and the help of skepticism. Thus this thing is a thinking thing that doubts. It exists because it thinks. The existence of a body cannot be proven but the thinking thing or “cogito” (Descartes L325) can be proven.…

    • 131 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, I will summarize the background of the Second Meditation that Descartes uses to explain his claim. Second, I will express my opinions concerning why Descartes’ argument is convincing. Third, I will make known an objection to Descartes’ claim, and then argue why is it incorrect. Descartes begins his Second Meditation by saying yesterday’s meditation, which is the First Meditation, has left him doubting his beliefs.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays