Rene Descartes Why Does God Exist

Improved Essays
descartes deals, in grand part, with existence. The fact that we can give thoughts and reasoning to a subject or matter, leads us to think that we exist as premise 1 states :" I think,therefore I am". For this reason, if we are being deceived or controlled by a demon/computer, we would not have the ability to think on our own. Therefore, Descartes is certain that God as a reason and exist because there is not reason that God would have give the ability to think to humanity and yet have a evil demon to control us. Those two thoughts cannot co-exist and, as a result, Descartes is certain that God does not allow the evil to deceive us. Consequently, the world exist as we perceive it and humanity has a distinct conception of it because God exists and He is Good. Since the actual process of thinking makes us exist, the mind is seeing as a existing part of humanity. …show more content…
His theory of thinking is based on clear and distinct perception which is so obvious inside of his intellect that cannot be misgiving, therefore it exists.
According to Descartes’ premise 7, where it says that God is not a deceiver nor would allow evil to deceive us, through free will we are given the ability to make decisions on our own thoughts. Thus, nor God nor evil can program what we do. For this reason, it would not be possible for an evil demon or computer to mislead humanity.
Yet, evil things happen. Following Descartes’ theory, God still exists because we can think and make decisions freely. Humanity has made poor choices, which does not mean God is teaching humanity a lesson, because the choices were made by humanity through free

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The evidential problem of evil determines the degree of how much evil must be a part of the evidence of God’s existence. While on the other hand the logical problem of evil is seen through our own eyes. It bares the question whether God is a perfect because of all wrong taking place in the world. Through these two problems it is hard to even imagine that God is perfect. Through Richard Swinburne’s theodicy (theodicy - an attempt to defend God's omnibenevolence in the face of evil) , one comes to find the case that initially escapes the evidential and logical problems…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The premises of his argument explicitly draw upon the questions. Moreover, even if there is a supreme being that exists, how can it be proved that he gave us these faculties of will and intellect or that he has any interaction with us or cares about us whatsoever? His argument for God as a reason to believe all that one perceives is truth is more of a statement go faith than it is logic. Proving God’s existence is significant to the meditations because it is the only way to bring back the outside world, outside of the mind. For me, the only veridical foundation Descartes intellectual project finds is that…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To build his argument, Descartes begins by working with the premise of there being a God: “Clearly the idea of God, that is, the idea of a supremely perfect being, is one I discover to be no less within me than the idea of any figure or number. And that it belongs to God’s nature that he always exists is something I understand no less clearly and distinctly than is the case when I demonstrate in regard to some figure or number that something also belongs to the nature of that figure or number.” (Descartes, 59). In this quote, Descartes outlines why he believes that there is a God. The rationality he employs is based upon understanding the concept of God as being supremely perfect.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first conclusion that he comes to is that due to the five premises, God had to have been the entity that placed the ideas of God into Descartes’ mind (157). Through the five premises, Descartes casts out the idea of his thoughts of God coming from inside of himself, and he is able to pin the cause to a higher power (God). In short, Descartes argues that he is a thinking thing with an idea of God that could not in any way originated from himself due to his imperfect nature. After determining that God must have been the entity to put the ideas into his mind, Descartes’ finalizes his argument with one last conclusion; God must exist (157). After determining that there was no other way that the ideas of God could have came from anywhere else but God himself, Descartes was able to come to the conclusion that God…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Mal and Cobb are brought back to reality, it is evident that she thought she was still dreaming because the idea was still embedded in her mind. In the scene where Mal jumps of the ledge, she is doubtful about what is real and not real and wanted to die because that was the only way to wake up and go back to reality. Even at the end of the movie when Cobb goes home, he spins his top because he is worried that he is still dreaming. I believe that Descartes would think the idea of totems is not possible because if Cobb was dreaming, he would not be able to detect that. One of Descartes’ beliefs about existence and knowledge is the evil demon argument, which explained that all our thoughts could actually not be our own because an evil…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The discussion on whether the idea of God is innate has been held among many philosophers. There are two philosophers, Rene Descartes and John Locke, who both have come up detailed explanation and understanding of the idea of God. Descartes believes that the idea of God is innate and inborn with a human mind. Yet Locke argues that the idea of God is not innate. Two philosophers’ opinions reach a disagreement.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By claiming that thinking and reason are the perfections God has given humanity, he is trying to get everyone to use these perfections more. Descartes is trying to inspire people to think more through the entirety of his Discourse on Method. He uses his own story as a model for what can be gained by reasoning and deep thought. God is set up as an ideal to further push his readers to think and reason more. The predominately Christian audience he is writing to will more than likely start to view thinking and reasoning as good when they are presented as perfections given directly to humanity by God.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At the beginning of his fourth meditation, Descartes begins reflecting on the three main certainties that he has developed so far: 1) that God exists, 2) that God is not a deceiver, and 3) that God created him and is therefore responsible for all his faculties, including his faculty of judgment. Descartes seems satisfied with the first two convictions, however, he begins to explore the conflict that arises with the third; that, “if everything that is in me comes from God, and he did not endow me with a faculty for making mistakes, it appears that I can never go wrong” (Descartes and Cottingham 38). This dilemma, also known as the “Problem of Error”, prompts the need for Descartes to reconcile the two, seemingly contradictory positions. While…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Second, I will present Descartes’s first proof for the existence of God in the third meditation, and in the process present the steps clearly and distinctly, exactly as Descartes understands them. Thus, Descartes cannot be making a mistake when he proves the existence of God. Descartes argument for making mistakes in his third meditation in Meditation on First Philosophy is that human beings can make errors, even though God gave them perfect faculties. These mistakes are caused by our own will or free choice, which has a much broader scope…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is obvious to him the idea of God could not have come from himself because God is perfect, and infinite, which Descartes is not nor has he ever experienced. Therefore; God is the ultimate cause of our idea of God, because Descartes could not have been the cause of the idea because he is not infinite and the idea of something can only come from something that truly is. Thus, God exists and is the cause of our idea of…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And thus they exist. Descartes produces an explanation of the deception he has experienced in the past. Claiming it’s his fault because of his misuse of god’s gift, allowing the will to extend beyond the intellect. So under these rules, Descartes has provided a method to examine the problem.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays