Rene Descartes Third Meditation

Improved Essays
Rene Descartes was a French philosopher who was known as the “Father of Modern Philosophy”. Descartes gives us six different reflections, which are the Meditations, his most acclaimed work. These letters are written to some of the wisest and most dignified men. To find a better understanding of these letters for myself, I want to dig deeper into …show more content…
“From the fact alone that I cannot conceive God except as existing, it follows that existence is inseparable from him, and consequently that he does, in truth, exist” (Davis 68). Descartes explains that only an adequate thing could produce an idea of God, and because God is the only adequate thing, then there has to be a God. Descartes thinks of this idea of God deceiving him but his conclusion that, “it is impossible that He, God, should ever deceive me, since in all fraud and deception there is some element of imperfection” (Rogers 79). Descartes comes to the conclusion that he can doubt other things but he cannot doubt the existence of God because of his definite and transparent view of …show more content…
“Descartes speaks of his ‘faculty of judgment.’ By this he means only that he recognizes that he has the ability to form beliefs about the truth or falsity of various claims” (Meditation). Descartes considers that since he serves an almighty God that his “faculty of judgment” shouldn’t lead into error. Maybe this would be true for an infinite being, like God, but Descartes comes to the conclusion that humans are finite beings so it is impossible for us to be faultless. Descartes explains that “error is not merely the lack of all possible true beliefs, but the presence of false beliefs” (Meditation). Then he ponders the question of, where does falseness come from? We as Christians hear this question quite often and refer to the answer as freewill, or better know as the problem of evil. God gave us freewill as a gift, and as humans we twist this gift and turn it into something that is not so favorable in God’s eyes. Descartes stresses that God is not to blame for human error, it is man’s aberration and man alone has to strive for purity and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    First of Descartes wrote a series of six meditations to try to argue and establish his philosophical views. In this part of my paper I’m going to explain the first, third, and fifth Meditations Descartes has to offer, to give you background on this topic. Though there are other arguments, they don’t apply nor impact the validity of Descartes Ontological Argument. In Descartes first Meditation, Descartes says…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What steps does Descartes take to prove his existence and that God exists? (one of the proofs). Discuss whether his reasoning is sound and convincing. In this essay, I will discuss how after the first and second meditation, Descartes knows that he exists and that he is a thinking thing.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Six Meditations by Descartes offer valuable insight into the differences between the mind and the body. Through his discussion he demonstrates to us that the mind and body are two distinct things that could potentially exist without one another. The dialogue Monday Night puts many of the claims made by Descartes through many tests. They question many of the ideas that Descartes presents, and both explain and shoot down his ideas. The ideas demonstrated in the Meditations are confusing and absurd and don’t prove a distinction between the mind and body.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, I will be explaining a meditation in Rene Descartes’ book, Meditations on First Philosophy. First I will summarize how he got to his point in meditation three, and then I will give my opinion on whether or not his claims are successful or unsuccessful. In meditation three Rene Descartes tries convincing the reader that God actually does exist. He starts off by briefly explaining the first two meditations.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dolegui Wilfried Nanfack PHIL 2101-(ET6) For this paper, I’ll be talking about Descartes’s argument for dualism in the “sixth Meditation” and “multiple personalities”. Descartes, both as a philosopher and scientist, is at two levels of understanding of the real. It’s back to nature in a mechanistic framework to which the body is subjected, and at the same time, it supports a dualism of soul and body in which the soul escapes the body determinations. In his sixth Meditation the author methodically describes the characters that are unique to the soul and the body and raises the contradictions that result from their union. In addition, it plays a fundamental role in the game of passion that bases all of his moral theory.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using specific arguments from these sources, the answer to this fundamental question has been answered in the text on several occasions. Questions of “ultimate meaning” are important because they assist the conclusion of desires, thoughts, and confusion. The focal point of both pieces of literature is the question, “what is really real?” which has answers waiting upon discovery. Really real is those concepts or material that can be touched, experienced, and carried out in a life. To begin, in Descartes’ Meditation and Other Metaphysical Writings, Sixth Meditation followed the philosophical question…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes Deceit

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many year has past when Rene Descartes realize that everything he had thought was to be true wasn’t, It turn out that everything he had worked on was a lie as well. Rene Descartes realize what he now what he has to do, he has to start all over from the ground up. Rene Descartes say’s “reason tells me that as well as withholding assent from propositions that are obviously false, I should also withhold it from ones that are not completely certain and indubitable. So all I need, for the purpose of rejecting all my opinions, is to find in each of them at least some reason for doubt.” (Descartes)…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of doing so, Descartes was able to rebuild his beliefs on the foundation of this things that he knew for certain was true. Descartes believed that trying to debunk all of his beliefs would be tedious so instead, he concluded that all of this beliefs came from the senses. He also concluded that the senses sometimes deceive us, thus they have a possibility of being false. Descartes does not argue that because we are sometimes fooled by the senses that we are always fooled by them.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But from time to time I have found that the senses deceive, and it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once.” (Descartes 33) However, after focusing on that concept he realized that in order to think and doubt the existence of everything, he must first exist. Following that line of reasoning, he realized that his existence was the only thing he knew to be true, and by extension, his intellect and his ability to think was also…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A perfect deceiver cannot lead one into deceit or error. As a result, if God truly existed, human beings would not be imperfect. Descartes’s arguments contradict one another and thus the clear picture being unclear. During the argument much contradiction transpires as Descartes argues that God is not a deceiver therefore human beings are perfect and at the same time argue that human beings are imperfect and thus their existence is uncertain. Descartes’s arguments are related, and there is no significant difference.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    And thus they exist. Descartes produces an explanation of the deception he has experienced in the past. Claiming it’s his fault because of his misuse of god’s gift, allowing the will to extend beyond the intellect. So under these rules, Descartes has provided a method to examine the problem.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays