Rene Descarte's Argument For The Existence Of God

Improved Essays
Rene Descartes born in France in 1956 has brought many influential ideas. Among many of his ideas was that of analytical geometry. He was based on using mathematics as a foundation for knowledge and finding truth. As such, he wants to prove God’s existence by surrounding himself of ideas. He questions himself about things in doubt and clear and distinct ideas. As well, Descartes wants to clarify that being imperfect cannot produce something more perfect and that is better to know perfect than to doubt. Because imperfection is part of an imperfect human, Descartes finds that there is a cause for human errors. Descartes has found that he is certain of existing as a thinking thing. “I am certain that I am a thinking thing.”(Descartes, 70) Descartes gives two arguments for God’s existence. He begins with his first …show more content…
His second argument is based on two forms of reality. First, formal reality refers to anything that has the quality of existing. Formal reality has three forms: finite, infinite, and mode. Descartes proclaims that God is an existing thing having an infinite formal reality, substances have finite formal reality, and that modes are modal formal reality. Yet, Descartes controversial idea of God being an infinite reality brings out a must which is to have an infinite objective reality. Moreover, Descartes believes that ideas do not just sprung coming from nothing, that there is something producing that idea. Having thought about this idea situation, Descartes makes two principles of it: 1) there has to be reality in cause and effect and 2) there has to be considerable formal reality in the cause of an idea just as objective reality in an idea. An infinite objective reality idea is being the idea of God. Descartes conclude that the infinite formal reality (God) is the one who produces his ideas; thus, God exists. Descartes uses clear and distinct perceptions to prove God’s

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    First of Descartes wrote a series of six meditations to try to argue and establish his philosophical views. In this part of my paper I’m going to explain the first, third, and fifth Meditations Descartes has to offer, to give you background on this topic. Though there are other arguments, they don’t apply nor impact the validity of Descartes Ontological Argument. In Descartes first Meditation, Descartes says…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes tries to make sense of the existence of God by using Adequate reality, the belief that an idea must have as much formal reality as it has objective…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation Five: Concerning the Essence of Material Things, and Again Concerning God, That He Exists, Descartes claims that he has a new argument for the existence of God, which is different from the one that he gave in Meditation Three: Concerning God, That He Exists. Both Meditation Five and Meditation Three create an argument based on God and His Existence; however, Descartes created a new argument that was different from the previous one. In Meditation Three, Descartes proves that God does in fact exist and that He is not a deceiver. This argument did not only prove an existence,, yet it helped readers, like me, understand that we are not deceived when we are trying to perceive different things around us.…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Descartes’ second meditation, he offers up an argument for Defective Nature Doubt that brings forth the idea that we can’t be certain of anything we perceive being actual and real (153). Descartes thinks that there is a possibility that we are constantly being deceived due to the fact that we don’t know, with perfect certainty, where our ideas originate from (154). He tries to describe a method in order to dispel this Defective Nature Doubt by giving an argument for the existence of God. I think that the argument he gives for the existence of God is valid, yet I find it to be unsound due to the fact that a few of his premises are can easily be doubted. In order to express this opinion, I will first provide explanations of the premises and…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But if one defines walking as how one walks in a dream, or the thought of walking, then it is a thought, and therefore since it is a thought, they exist. Since Descartes found this certainty that one exists because they have the ability to think, he has just defeated skepticism and attained a piece of perfect…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (16) The idea of God also cannot be invented by Descartes himself because if he was the inventor, he would have the ability to add or take away anything to the idea but this idea doesn’t permit interference. (17) So the only cause of the idea remaining is that it is innate, having to come within Descartes’s own self. Descartes then uses the causal adequacy principle which claims that any idea that has representative reality must come from a cause that contains at least as much intrinsic reality as there is representative reality in the idea.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These ideas are those that represent substances and contain more objective reality. These ideas are first modes or accidents, finite substance, and infinite substance. Descartes continues that through the natural light he cannot doubt that, “there must at least be as much reality in the efficient…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes and God’s Existence Rene Descartes was a French philosopher, mathematician and a scientist in the seventeenth century. As a man of science, Descartes wanted to make discoveries in science as factual as mathematics. With Descartes’s faith, he did not eliminate God from philosophy. Descartes, “The Father of Modern Philosophy”, was a Catholic who wrote the Meditations on First Philosophy. “The Meditations is characterized by Descartes’s use of methodic doubt, a systematic procedure of rejecting as though false all types of belief in which one has been, or could ever be, deceived.”…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ “Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy” is ultimately his journey for true knowledge. In his third meditation he tackles the topic of whether or not there is a God. So far he has talked on his methods of how to find true knowledge such as taking everything that he thinks he knows and discarding it as well as only basing what is true on the fact that he can prove it within his own mind. He has concluded this for multiple reasons such as his senses may all be just a dream and the fact that he may have been deceived by an outside force.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He establishes that he is included in the category of finite beings. Because of the relationship he established between formal reality and objective reality, he concludes that he and can conceive of other ideas outside of himself because they are finite as well. With this same reasoning, he should not be able to conceive of something infinite—such as God--because he is finite. This leads him to believe that the idea of God is an innate idea—an idea we have by nature. Once Descartes establishes his innate understanding of God, he searches for the possible cause of his idea.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout his “Meditations” Descartes will demonstrate that he is breaking away from the traditional way of thinking and metaphysics. And, throughout the text Descarte will lay out a foundation to a different way of thinking. One in which one does not solely rely on the senses to know things, but instead rely on an inspection of the mind. But, this conflicts with other philosophers of Descartes time, and it conflicts with what is being taught within the schools, Around Descartes time, many of the schools were using the writings of Aquinas and therefore Aristotle to teach, and they had become almost the center of philosophy. In this paper I will discuss and explain how Descartes’ views are different from the medieval and classical views of Aquinas and Aristotle.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes goes into questioning whether his existence is valid since all of our surroundings and understandings can be undone with doubt. This is hyperbolic doubt, the beginning of methodological doubt which is a technique Descartes believes we should use to rid ourselves of inaccurate thinking. He poses the question of how do we know that we exist if we cannot depend on our sense and math if there is a being that can deceive us every step of the way and leaves the physical world as nonexistent were that the case. With this, he reckons that even there is a deceiving demon, the fact that he can think cannot be denied and declares it as “cogito ergo sum” or “I think, therefore, I am” (Meditation II). To affirm existence is to be able to think, even if we do not have a body which encompasses all the senses that could be deceived therefore making it impossible to exist.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays