Another argument Galileo wrote was ‘that the same God’ that had given humankind the gifts of ‘reason and intellect’ wanted people to use them. The point of his argument is that if God did not wish for people to wonder and gaze into the sky and pull apart its inner workings people would not have the ability to do so. Galileo argued the Bible’s gaps further when questioned the Bible’s title of ‘queen’ in all matters. He did not deny the Bible was the ‘queen’ of theology, but for other topics such as geometry or astronomy that there were other sources and writers with more authority. He stresses this point further when he argues for points that because the Bible is not the authority in science related matter people should look to other sources
Another argument Galileo wrote was ‘that the same God’ that had given humankind the gifts of ‘reason and intellect’ wanted people to use them. The point of his argument is that if God did not wish for people to wonder and gaze into the sky and pull apart its inner workings people would not have the ability to do so. Galileo argued the Bible’s gaps further when questioned the Bible’s title of ‘queen’ in all matters. He did not deny the Bible was the ‘queen’ of theology, but for other topics such as geometry or astronomy that there were other sources and writers with more authority. He stresses this point further when he argues for points that because the Bible is not the authority in science related matter people should look to other sources