Removal Act DBQ

Great Essays
The question of the rights of Native Americans in the Americas was not a new one when the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was passed. European colonial empires mostly chose the route of oppression. The United States of America, a new nation lacking precedent, had to decide the path it would take regarding the Native American. After nearly a half-century of discussion (of varying intensity) of the issue, the pressure to make a decision reached its peak, and in 1830 the United States determined to relocate the Native Americans to advance white society at any cost necessary. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the actions associated with it were in gross violation of the Constitution and the founding principles of the United States. Benefitting solely …show more content…
Although his desire for an agrarian nation was strong, Jefferson’s compassion for the Native Americans continued the pattern of his predecessors. In a letter to William Henry Harrison, then governor of Indiana, Jefferson wrote: “Our system is to live in perpetual peace with the Indians, to cultivate an affectionate attachment from them, by everything just and liberal which we can do for them within... reason, and by giving them effectual protection against wrongs from our own people.” Prior to Jackson’s presidency, a model of parity with the Native American had begun to form, yet he replaced it with a policy of unfair treatment. The Act itself was not only a turnaround of the accepted interaction with Native Americans, but also, in terms of enforcement, a monumental moral failure on the part of the United States. Howard Zinn neatly summarizes the quantifiable consequences of Indian Removal: “In 1820, 120,000 Indians lived east of the Mississippi. By 1844, fewer than 30,000 were left.” The simple repetition of a statistic, however, cannot completely convey the true human cost of 1830s Indian Removal. Zinn describes the individual physical and emotional struggles of being forced West suffered by the Native …show more content…
The American Revolution and the corresponding fight for freedom from British rule was perhaps the single greatest example of this opposition. The first Americans declared their independence from Britain to free themselves from a ruler that was foreign and distant. The English Parliament could not effectively ascertain the needs of Americans, yet, without representation, many attempts to extract value were made, leading to the Revolution. With this in mind, the parallels between British oppression of Americans and American oppression of Native Americans become clear. The inherent hypocrisy was that while the United States was founded in opposition to a distant and unrelateable hegemon, it became just that in relation to the Native Americans. A nation founded through the disposal of a distant oppressor ought to not turn into one

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Chief Standing Bear

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Background Information and Thesis When America was still in its early years, Indians had a socioeconomic status less than that of a black person -- that is unless they became assimilated tax payers. The U.S. government toyed with them like puppets for years as America expanded west, forcibly securing them in federally controlled reservations under the guise of protecting them. By the mid 1800’s, all Native American tribes resided west of the Mississippi River on reservations due to the Indian Removal Act signed in 1830. Relationships between Indians and the government had been strained at best for decades. The government didn’t view Indians as human, which, in turn, made them think they could simply relocate the tribes whenever they pleased…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Jefferson made a policy in the 1780s to assimilate American Indians into white society. Andrew Jackson, however, passed a policy of removing Cherokees from their lands to the west of the Mississippi in the 1830s. The common goal of the two policies was to acquire Indian lands because the white colonists wanted to expand westward. Battles went on between the Americans and the American Indians, as one tried to take as the other tried to protect the lands. The policies the presidents passed was to take the lands of the Indians, but they had different ways of doing so.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Roundhouse Analysis

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Americans have a well-established tradition of imposing themselves onto other, less powerful peoples. The United States government has perfectly exemplified this when it comes to their treatment of Native Americans. Since their arrival in the fifteenth century, Europeans have exterminated Indian tribes, relocated them, and attacked their cultures. These strategies compounded and advanced well into the modern era, coming into fruition in the American government’s policies of termination in the 1950s, The Dawes Act of 1887, and Richard Pratt’s boarding schools in the late nineteenth century. Sherman Alexie’s…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antiremoval Subject

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act was first declared in a speech by U.S. President Andrew Jackson in 1829. Before that, Native Americans have settled in southern states, much to the displeasure of Southerners who wanted to preserve the land to themselves. Jackson was very clear on his stance on Native American rights and he openly supported establishing U.S. sovereignty. Jackson gained tremendous support…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nixon Dbq Analysis

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages

    ` The United States was on the verge of destruction starting from 1968 when Richard Nixon became president till 1974 when he resigned. American antiwar protests and economic decline were the least of the miseries; the Vietnam War and its threat of worldwide communism terrified Americans, people looked to their president and his administration to solve all of the looming dilemmas. The previous presidents left Nixon with a jumble of international problems. Starting with Truman, Americans were invested into the fight against communism, defending South Vietnam from their Northern communist counterparts, going into the Cold War to beat the USSR and refusing the acknowledge The People’s Republic of China as modern day China, through Nixon communism…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The historiography of Native Americans after European colonization is rather limited compared to American history, or even African American history in the United States. The lack of credible resources leaves anyone trying to research or obtain a clearer picture of the events with the words of President Jackson, and the possible hypothesis, not much occurred after relocation. The assumption is rather plausible; without knowing the historiography, one could assume Native Americans did quite well after relocation. Casinos, tax exemptions, sovereignty all seem to represent collective tribes that benefited from relocation as President Jackson illiterates. However, the assumption is completely false, and the lack of historiography only supports the counter hypothesis, the legacy is tarnished and forgotten, because of the atrocious treatment the natives experienced at the hand of capitalism, expansionism, and American…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “For us today, Indian removal may well retain its moral simplicity, but the issue as it unfolded was exceedingly complex. Not all white Americans supported Cherokee removal; not all Cherokees opposed it; and the drama itself took place against a complicated backdrop of ideology, self-interest, party politics, altruism, and…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian Removal Act: The Indian Removal Act was a law that called for 60,000 American Indians to resettle. On May 28, 1830, it was approved by Andrew Jackson, the United States President. According to the Act, reservations were to be set up for the Indians that lived in the territories that the United States government wanted to settle. Indians that had settlements in these lands were forced to move to reservations that were further west.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In 1830, Jackson put forth The Indian Removal Act, which proposed that all of the Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River would be moved west, into Indian Territory. Through this, Jackson believed that he was helping the Indians because in his opinion, having settlers and Indians living in close proximity was not beneficial to either group (“Indian Removal Act” 1). This Act was controversial because many Native American tribes were already promised land, which they were now being forced to leave (“Indian Removal Act” 2). The Cherokee Indian tribes living in Georgia were strongly against the Indian Removal Act due to a treaty with the state claiming that they could keep their land as long as they wanted if they assimilated into American culture (O’Brien 3). The Cherokee tribes had kept their end of the treaty by speaking English and sending their children to schools, but the state of Georgia wanted the land because they had found gold there and the land was fertile for growing cotton.…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This law triggered the mass genocide of Indians in the United States. The Indian Removal Act was unjustifiable due to the natives creation of a civilized…

    • 2378 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Definition

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian removal itself shows how people will manipulate freedom to benefit from the outcome, which in this case is the land that Indians occupied. The act forcefully encouraged established Indian societies east of the Mississippi to abandon the comfort of their homes and lives in order to move west of the Mississippi. The Cherokee in Georgia are a great example of a stable Indian society where they felt their social independence allowed them access to social freedom sans interference from whites. (Lecture 11-8) Andrew Jackson and his Indian Removal Act disregarded the social freedoms that were already given to and claimed by the Native Americans who had assimilated into the white culture desired by Americans. Even tribe leaders who made a concerted effort towards “civilization” did not suffice as enough reason for Jackson to abandon the inhumane act of relocation.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays