Analysis Of Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason

Great Essays
The “summum bonum” is an ancient Latin expression which was introduced by the Roman philosopher Cicero, meaning “the highest good.” The old proverb is often used when answering the question of what makes for a meaningful life. In Immanuel Kant’s Religion Within the Boundaries of Bare Reason, he reasserts this “highest good” and describes it as “happiness proportioned to virtue.” Kantian philosophy rationally endorses the “highest good” of humanity, which cannot be fully attained in this world. This is an eternal good found in a “supremely powerful moral ruler capable of uniting virtue and happiness,” namely, God. Kant argues that theoretical proof of God’s existence is not possible, but presents a logical argument for the belief in God. According to Kant, belief in God’s existence is a purely rational concept, exemplified in human’s rational nature, reasoned through a universally accessible moral code, and upheld in an innate desire for the “highest good.”
In Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, he lays out a foundational framework for the structure of human beings. He recognizes that humans are composed of both a rational and sensible nature. As rational beings, humans “bind themselves to a moral law that commands unconditionally” (5). However, as sensible beings, humans have
…show more content…
He asserts how many of the moral values that human beings possess are naturally embedded in the very construction of their inner being. This “natural religion,” (85) is engraved on every human mind, therefore, all people can be convinced of it through their own rationality. Kant firmly contends that this natural morality is without intervention of scripture or tradition. Regardless, he does not reject the mere belief and faith in God’s existence, even though he does not attempt to factually prove it. Kant provides a way for faith in God; one “generated by human practical (moral) reason.”

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ubuntu Ethics The world we live in is a complex equilibrium between good and evil where we are constantly faced with moral dilemmas. Although many different schools of thought have attempted to define the most appropriate code of ethics for humans I chose to focus on the Kantian and Ubuntu moral theories. The basis of Kantian morality is that there are clear and simple moral truths that dictate our actions, while Nussbaum (2003) states that Ubuntu morality focuses on a person’s existence within a community as a basis for moral decisions (Kant & Gregor, 1998). By using the “Nazi at the door” dilemma as a foil between the two theories, I showed how both theories equally fail to define the appropriate code of moral conduct for humanity.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lewis opens up his book with a lengthy philosophical talk about why humans feel the need to do good and not evil, in short, to obey the moral law. However, before he explains “why,” he tells us “what” the moral law actually is. He explains that the moral law is the instinct that man has to be fair to his fellow man, yet he tells us that the law is not an instinct at all. Lewis brings up flight and fight instinct, the instinct to consume food, and the instinct to mate; all of these instincts are more or less aiding or self-preservation and survival, but the moral law is something different. Lewis tells his readers that the law often favors the action that would not aid the survival of a human being.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Corruption Of Sin

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Actions committed within the world always have an impact upon life, no matter how seemingly extraordinary or insignificant. The decision to perform these actions is determined by the conscience, the overseer of what is right and wrong, within the mind. Everyday actions are performed by mankind and are interpreted as either righteous or heinous, more often than not falling towards the latter. Mankind is born with an inherent inclination towards this wrongdoing and sin. Sinful actions made every day in society constitute human nature and despite a lack of dependency for primal impulse, it inevitably holds control.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The philosophies of Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are essentially polar opposites of one another, but in the most basic form they have similarities. Mill’s main belief was in utilitarianism, ascertaining that individuals should act in such a way as to maximize overall utility, and the preponderance of pleasure over pain. Kant classified as a transcendental idealist, holding that experiences are governed by necessary causal laws, which almost posits itself into a subsection of rationalism, as causal laws are often with reason. The philosophies of the modern philosophers Kant and Mill have disparities in a wide variety of areas, such as ethics, and have minimal similarities.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this paper, I will compare the argument Hume makes and Kant’s claim for the origin of moral motivation. First, I will look at the argument made by Hume, who argues that passion is the root of all moral motivation. Then, I will examine the claim made by Kant, who posits that reason is the origin of moral judgements. After showcasing both, I will compare the two. Finally, I will conclude by arguing that Hume’s argument for the origin of moral judgements is the stronger of the two.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Religion

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When reading Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason and Dialogues and Natural History of Religion, two philosophers, David Hume and Immanuel Kant, both attempt to cover similar concepts of reason and human nature, although they perceive them in entirely different ways. Kant and Hume differ greatly on their concepts and standpoints of philosophy but also had a few similarities as well. “…I must first know that something is duty before I can acknowledge it as a divine command is natural religion” (Kant 6:154). Immanuel Kant believed that all moral reasoning was based on rational thought. When handed the opportunity, a rational thinker would make a rational choice, while an irrational thinker would make an irrational choice.…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant 's Categorical Imperative states that there are unconditional requirements that must be obeyed no matter the circumstances; a few of those requirements being that lying, stealing, and murdering should all be absolutely prohibited no matter what, even if doing any of those things would bring about more happiness than not. To look at it another way, he poses two questions: "Can I rationally will that everyone act as I propose to act?" and "Does my action respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for my own purposes? " If the answer to both of the questions is "no," then Kant says we must not perform the action because it would be unethical. I do not agree with this "absolute" argument because fairly often there are moral and ethical dilemmas that contradict this claim.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Kant, we constitute our world through the ongoing synthesis of the categories of our mind with the sensations of experience. His argument is to determine the limits and scope of reason. Hence he inferred, that reason was altogether deluded with the reference to this concept, which she erroneously considered as one of her children, whereas in reality it was nothing but a bastard of imagination. Furthermore he concludes that in plain language, there cannot be any such thing as metaphysics. Not to mention that if we cannot rely on the power and authenticity of cause-and-effect principle, then scientific discovery and progress is an endeavor doomed to epistemological uncertainty.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    About the Ground of Morality In the controversy of the general foundation of morality, Hume insists that sentiment is the ground of morality, and Kant holds that reason is the foundation of morality. In my opinion, although reasons play a role in morality, it is sentiment that ultimately determine what is morally good or evil. In this essay, I will explain both Hume and Kant’s arguments, elaborate on an objection to Kant’s argument with explanation, and finally provide the potential objection to Hume’s argument. Hume contends that sentiment is the foundation of morality.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In other words, all individuals must uphold an unconditional good, to do this, one must be a rational person. A key factor relating to Kant’s theory, is that an individual may not interfere with another’s’ goals or objectives that a person may have. In addition, Kant discusses the moral rules that all autonomous and rational…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Being A Moral Saint

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As humans, we have a limit to how much we can follow the moral law. In order to have an ideal life, we must be able to fulfil our passions to cultivate non-moral excellences. (Wolf, Moral Saint,…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays