Religion And Science In Cat's Cradle By Kurt Vonnegut

Better Essays
Forever at war, religion and science divide the people. For some, there must be a reason behind any phenomenon. Events do not happen haphazardly. To others, a higher power is all the reasoning they require. Being able to look up to a higher power give some people comfort. In Kurt Vonnegut’s novel Cat’s Cradle, Vonnegut questions the authenticity of both institutions through the reaction humanity has on the stances of religion and science. Through Bokononist ideas and the field of science, Vonnegut is able to portray the effects religion and science have on society.
Vonnegut creates a fictional religion that allows him to show how people find unity through their religion. Bokononism is intended to represent all religions. Bokononism gives people
…show more content…
Scientists do not agree with that notion due to the fact that society still supports the products of their experiments. Scientists are aware of what society has to say about them. To show their knowledge about the claim Vonnegut says, “‘All your questions seem into getting me to admit that scientists are heartless, conscienceless, narrow boobies, indifferent to the fate of the rest of the human race, or maybe not really members of the human race at all’” (39). It seems to be difficult for society to humanize scientists because they are all generalized as heartless. Although society denounces them, they still put their trust and money into the field of science because they are able to provide what society needs. In the article Shameless Lies: An Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle, the author of the article shows how much society relies on science by stating, “We place our lives in the hands of childish men like Hoenikker on a daily basis. Science has dangerous potential when not treated with the utmost respect, and when used frivolously, to keep marines out of mud, for instance, it can have devastating repercussions” (“Shameless Lies: An Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut’s Cat’s Cradle” 3). How would the scientists know that their work is wrong if the masses still support their creations? The atomic bomb Dr. Hoenikker creates to end World War II is a great example in which it was an evil for the greater good. Innocent lives were taken due to the bomb, but without it the war would have continued which could potentially take even more lives. Sacrifices have to be made unknownst to the public in which they can benefit

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Critique of DNA: A Parasite that Builds its Own Host from The Science Delusion In the third chapter of The Science Delusion, author Curtis White builds upon the importance of Romanticism as a counterculture for our science and logic based search for truth in our current society, as introduced in the second chapter. White enlightens his audience on what Romanticism can provide to our society as well as what science fails to provide for our humanity. His argument in remains mainly biological based but gives his audience a picture of how Romanticism has shaped human history. Throughout making his argument, White inherently gives his audience a look at his personal values and morals. Whether by design or by accident, the values White excerpts…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Their entrance to the war, in Japanese leaders eyes, was a bigger blow than the atomic bombs. (Wainstock, 129) While the US was worried of Soviet influence, dropping of the bombs would have not made Soviet influence easier to contain in Europe. (Szilard, Document F) Dropping of the bombs, however, may have prevented Soviet influence in southern Asia and Japan, and although the US would have been able to defeat Japan through land invasions, projected casualties on both sides could have exceeded the amount killed in the atomic…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to Karellen, they fear that the Overlords know the truth about their beliefs and will tear them apart. “We represent reason and science, and, however confident they may be in their beliefs, they fear that we will overthrow their gods.” In the novel, science dominates religion, the Overlords are too advanced and have been studying mankind for a long time. The world’s religions are scared that Karellen will reveal something that will make their religions seem like a lie, whether the Overlords actually know it or not. The fact that the Overlords are more advanced and might have witnessed these events happening creates fear. Clarke showcases the conflict between science and religion using Stormgren and Karellen in this case to represent the scientific side and Wainwright to represent the religious side.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Of course he wouldn’t want to waste such an expensive piece of work on just a demonstration but still something could have been done to show how much destruction could be caused from the atomic bomb. That isn’t the most wholesome reason to drop a highly destructive bomb but it doesn’t seem too out of the ordinary for a government official to do so. Another reason said behind the dropping of the bomb is that it was to scare the Soviet Union out of continuing the war by showing how much power America had. It is hard to tell what the actual reason behind dropping the bomb was. America wanting to show who is boss is a big reason many people think the bomb was used.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the American’s didn’t do this, they would’ve been in a much worse situation and would raise up to surrender. 4. Conclusion To conclude, it was reasonable for America to bomb the Japanese during World War two, as there are many logical explanations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unspeakable tragedies but despite many beliefs, the decision of the atomic bombs and the motives of the U.S leaders, have saved many of lives. The U.S was justified as the droppings of atomic bombs were a collaborative method of ending the war, and to hurry up the Japanese’s surrender.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The atomic bomb was more devastating than the fire-bombings the United States dropped on Japan even though the fire-bombings had a higher death toll. But, why did the United States believe that the atomic bomb would end the war? The simple reason would be that the atomic bombs did not end the war. Top military officials agreed that the atomic bombs played no decisive role in ending the war . It was more likely that the United States wanted to test out the new weapon they had made and its effects on a real city, which is why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as the real world testing grounds.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States responded brutally, and unnecessarily. Things could have been handled way differently. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified because many innocent lives were lost, the U.S. could have handled the matter in a less brutal way, the U.S. was unaware the outcome of the atomic bomb. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified because many innocent lives were lost. The bomb not only has destroyed the land permanently killing thousands of innocents and destroying their homes, but left radiation to kill thousands…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Once he meets the Council and presents them with the lightbulb, his own discovery, they dismiss it. He harbors resentment for how they disgraced his ideas. Equality shrieks, “You fools! You thrice-damned fools!” (Anthem 75). Equality’s anger emphasizes the immense pride he has in his own intelligence, as he believed he was doing good by showing them his groundbreaking invention but once they reject it, he calls them fools rather than feeling ashamed.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jobs went against the technology world, ignored their complaints and discouragements which led him to be a very influential person. Some people still believe that complexity is better and is for everyone, but not…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One may ask can a myth be history if it is confirmed or is it strictly noted as a myth. While myths can be fabrications, they often teach of important values and morals. However, with the modern value of science, the devaluing of myths has become very common. This devaluing, to many historians, is alarming because it takes away from the many lessons, moral, and values that it could teach. The devaluing of myths has led religious people of various faiths to make their myths scientific history which then blurs the line between myth and history.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays