Topic: Release and Reintegration
Summary: Release and reintegration was the last step in learning about how the criminal justice system functions. To me, this was one of the most important topics as it deals with offenders being released from the system and reintegrating into the broader community. The lecture and required readings informed us on the ways that convicted offenders can be released from prison and placed on parole. Parole allows the prisoners to be reintegrated into the community so they can reconnect with family and friends. Reintegration as described by Maruna, Immarigeon, and LeBel (2004), is both a process and an event. This is due to reintegration ensuring the offender does not reoffend and that they assimilate into the community correctly. This symbolises instrumental aims, as instrumental aims seek to prevent future crime (Daly, 2012).
It also demonstrates how the outcome is more important than the process. A prisoner can be released on parole if they complete their mandatory sentencing and show good behaviour. However, a risk assessment needs to be completed that examines the nature of the individual’s offence and how they acted whilst incarcerated before a decision …show more content…
The culture shock was briefly discussed during the lecture, with the lecturer commenting on how the technological advantages contribute to the shock. The shock was also examined in the set readings with examples being made to Charles Mason and how the events after being released contributed to his future criminal actions (Maruna, Immarigeon and LeBel, 2004). Other issues that released offenders encounter include discrimination when trying to find suitable accommodation or employment, finding programs that help with their mental issues, and establishing support networks. The issues can be aggravated depending on the race, gender, and age of the individual and the stigmatisation of their
Summary: Release and reintegration was the last step in learning about how the criminal justice system functions. To me, this was one of the most important topics as it deals with offenders being released from the system and reintegrating into the broader community. The lecture and required readings informed us on the ways that convicted offenders can be released from prison and placed on parole. Parole allows the prisoners to be reintegrated into the community so they can reconnect with family and friends. Reintegration as described by Maruna, Immarigeon, and LeBel (2004), is both a process and an event. This is due to reintegration ensuring the offender does not reoffend and that they assimilate into the community correctly. This symbolises instrumental aims, as instrumental aims seek to prevent future crime (Daly, 2012).
It also demonstrates how the outcome is more important than the process. A prisoner can be released on parole if they complete their mandatory sentencing and show good behaviour. However, a risk assessment needs to be completed that examines the nature of the individual’s offence and how they acted whilst incarcerated before a decision …show more content…
The culture shock was briefly discussed during the lecture, with the lecturer commenting on how the technological advantages contribute to the shock. The shock was also examined in the set readings with examples being made to Charles Mason and how the events after being released contributed to his future criminal actions (Maruna, Immarigeon and LeBel, 2004). Other issues that released offenders encounter include discrimination when trying to find suitable accommodation or employment, finding programs that help with their mental issues, and establishing support networks. The issues can be aggravated depending on the race, gender, and age of the individual and the stigmatisation of their