Example Of Moral Relativism

Improved Essays
Moral relativism is defined as the ethical beliefs that are relative to certain factors such as individual and society. (Irwin & Johnson, 2010) According to Stephen Colbert, he believes that there is no absolute standard for truthiness; therefore, an individual behavior or action is justified to be right, could also be wrong and otherwise. (Irwin & Johnson, 2010)Some people might agree with the point that the rightness or wrongness of the truth is really based on what they believe rather than what the society believes; however, I personally have quite different perspective upon this argument. The goal of this paper is to criticize that ethical relativism does not reflect the universal ethical truth.
First example of moral relativism is about
…show more content…
If the original definition of marriage is to celebrate lifetime happiness, but sadly in some parts of the world where child marriage is still popular, there is no more reason to be happy. In some countries such as India, Bangladesh or Ethiopia, child marriage is known as one of the common social norms. (Child marriage, 2016)They force children who are underage to get married. According to the prohibition of Child marriage Act, 18 is the legal age for women to get married and 21 is legal age for men. (Child marriage, 2016) However, in India, there are more than 250 million kids who are forced to get married before 15. (Child marriage, 2016) Another shocking fact that these children are being used as a swap in order to get financial benefits in return (Child marriage, 2016) Lots of children from these countries have to suffer severe harm both physically and mentally. (Child marriage, 2016) There are many reasons that Child marriage should not be supported and continue to carry on. Studies found that getting married at such a young age, kids are forced to do things they do not eager to do such as abusing them as a maid or even forcing them to have sexual activities in order to have babies as soon as possible. (Child marriage, 2016) Consequently, after all the hurtful facts and news, would it still be okay to say that moral truth should be related to cultural differences? From my opinion, the value of humanity would be more likely low since people agree to let these evil acts happen on those poor kids. It is a must to have an absolute ethical standard which will ban the underage marriage activities and set some strictly punishment for those who are crossing the line of the universal moral

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In south Sudan, a country in northern Africa, government statistics show, “…half the girls there aged 15 to 19 are married, with some brides as young as 12 years old. ‘The country's widespread child marriage exacerbates South Sudan's pronounced gender gaps in school enrollment, contributes to soaring maternal mortality rates, and violates the right of girls to be free from violence,’ says a Human Rights Watch report…” (Doki). The young girls are sent to be married to benefit the family, and it is almost like the girls are being sold. Not only does this take away the girls’ freedom of choice, but it also impacts many other areas of their lives: “Aguet N. of South Sudan, for example, was married to a 75-year-old man when she was 15 years old, according to testimony she gave to Human Rights Watch.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think it is hard enough for a culture to distinguish its own moral principles that finding morals that suit the majority of their citizens is something that should happen before discussing tolerance of the moral principles of other cultures. If someone who lives in the United States does not share the morals that are commonly accepted by the majority to US citizens, does that mean they should uproot their life to find a culture that better suits their moral principles? If this happened each person would know they are living in a culture that is perfect for them and should not be bothered by what the other cultures are…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Final Paper Assignment My purpose in this essay is to explain why I believe that morality is objective versus moral relativism, which ethical theory do I ratify and the reasons behind why I do, and express how I would respond to a stranger’s objection to that specific ethical theory. Theory of Morality, also known as theory of the right, is concerned with identifying fundamental moral norms, rules, or principles in which actions are evaluated and may be deemed as right or wrong. In other words, this is explaining what you ought or ought not to do. Moral relativism is to say that there are no moral truths.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fairfax county 's code of ethics is supported by six core principles that honesty, public service, respect, responsibility, stewardship, and trust (Fairfax County). However, ADR office deals with addressing and resolving workplace complaints, where confidentiality, voluntary process, mutual agreements, and impartial third party are major ethical boundaries. I studied about theory of ethical relativism that emphasizes on people 's different standards of evaluating acts as good or bad. These standard beliefs are true in their particular organization or circumstances, and the beliefs are not necessarily example of a basic moral values. It also takes a position that there is no moral right and wrong.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Virtue In Plato's Crito

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Just or unjust, good or bad, virtuous or vicious- Pablo López Yagüe The writings of Plato, Sandel, and Straus bridge centuries but all highlight the importance of political theory as the basis in providing a discourse for the reflection of life. Plato’s Crito focuses on reason by adapting the moral point of view on the affairs of justice and virtue, through the analysis of the human natural and the social contract. Sandel’s Doing the Right Thing deliberation on problems helps assess the difficulty of morality over individuals, society and the law in determining what is just and virtuous. However, Straus’ What is Political Philosophy considers the Socratic political philosophy thesis in an effort to restore rationalism, by criticizing positivism…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Child Marriage Restraint Act, 1929 was aimed to restrain the solemnisation of child marriages. It was applicable to all person irrespective of religion i.e. Hindus, Muslims and Christians etc. This Act defines the terms ‘child marriage‘, ‘child’, ‘minors’, etc. It prescribed the minimum age for marriage for both boys and girls. In 1929, the minimum age of marriage for girls was fifteen and for boys it was eighteen.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    James Rachels: 1: Moral relativism is the perspective that ethical benchmarks, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and in this way subject to a man's individual decision. We can all choose what is right for ourselves. Moral Relativists call attention to that humans are not omniscient, and history is loaded with samples of people and societies acting for the sake of a trustworthy truth later exhibited to be more than error prone, so we ought to be extremely careful about constructing vital ethical decisions in light of a gathered supreme case. Absolutes additionally have a tendency to hinder experimentation and abandon conceivable fields of request which may prompt advance in numerous fields, and smothering the human…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Hands Off Clitoridectomy” by Yael Tamir, discusses the controversial topic of clitoridectomy, and all the arguments within the subject while opening up a new way of perceiving it by comparing it to our own society and practices. She suggest that indeed the practice of clioridectomy is a gruesome and gutwrenching, but there is more to the subject than just the moral issues of it. She address the political and social aspects of performing and living with the procedure and addresses them with passive but firm arguments. Her main point of the article is that our society needs to stop judging and creating prejudices aimed at other cultures or societies when in fact we could be bettering our own society rather than critiquing others.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Relativism vs. Objectivism There are two different theories dealing with morality, what is right or wrong, and what is good or bad. The theories discussed will be, ethical relativism and ethical objectivism. Ethical relativism is defined as having no absolute stance on a position; there is no right or wrong. Ethical objectivism which claims that some moral rules really are correct. What would it mean for ethics if there were no absolutes?…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How should we think about ethics? In order to answer this ultimate question, we must first understand the crucial concepts of ethics, but before we look into the concepts, it is essential to state the basic definition of ethic because the word “ethics” is the basis of the question. In our society, ethics is commonly defined as the study of morals, which are the standards of right and wrong that show humans what to do. Knowing this, we can continue with the concepts of ethics. First of all, we have to understand how knowledge about ethics is gained.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Folkways, William Graham Sumner claimed that morality is actually just a reflection of the mores. He further argued that since morality came from the typical culture groups, it should be only bounded within the group but not universally. The thesis Sumner raised in his argument, aka, ethical relativism, had been challenged by many objections. In this essay, I will provide one objection of ethical relativism and argue that even Sumner attempted to address the objection; his thesis is still fallacious due to begging the question. One critical objection to ethical relativism is the absurd objection.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics