Moral Relativism Vs Absolutism

Improved Essays
Across all spectrums there have been different beliefs, thoughts, opinions, perceptions, and experiences. These ways in which people interpret the world help to conclude what people might think as “right” and “wrong”. But really, there is no such thing as a “right” or “wrong” that all people live by. One could say instead, that these ways in which we interpret the world are actually guidelines that people live by, partially uniquely subjective input and partially societal input all control an outcome of how human behavior works. This refers to the ideas of morality and specifically relativism and absolutism. Often, there are many misunderstandings or confusions around the two, especially moral relativism. Simply put, moral relativism refers …show more content…
And if we do, we are being ignorant. It isn’t our fault necessarily, but this tiny detail makes it hard to talk about cultural relativism without thinking about how our own experience and upbringing creates a one sided argument. More often than not, we categorize other people’s morals that are different than our own as “backward” or “primitive”. Cultural relativism is the idea that says there are different moral codes amongst different cultures. For example, the Greeks and Callatians funeral process. The Greeks, where they bury their dead, found it hard to except the Callatians funeral process where they eat their dead, and vice versa. Outside of each culture the practices are seen as “wrong” by the other, but inside the culture, they are fine with it. This rule explains differences between different people, and is supported by relativism. Relativism says that because of these differences, there is no way an absolutistic, universal law could account for all people of all times, because simply it can’t. An absolutist might argue that the differences between cultures are not that big or say that the cultural relativism argument is lazy, however, there are some cases that would prove this very wrong. …show more content…
But it did not and does not encourage a place of discovery, especially individual discovery. Relativism says that in some cases at some times it is pointless to have one answer. Relativism allows for us to use our opinions about moral issues based on feelings and experience. There is no general statement we can make that expresses an opinion that will ever be verifiable or true by all. This method helps discern a code of conduct, and creates and promotes self discovery and expression. Moral relativism promotes tolerance to understand other cultures. The thing we should ask ourselves is does absolutism encourage an environment that allows for growth? If the answer is no than it is flawed for that reason. Relativism allows the greatest flexibility to help answer the most complicated of problems. And it allows for people to ask difficult questions and decide for themselves what they

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    George Berkeley argues that an objective reality does not exist. He argues for idealism, the belief that the external world does not exist and only the mind and ideas do, by arguing against materialism, that an objective reality does exist. Berkeley believes that an objective reality does not exist because of issues that come with materialism. However, his points do not make much sense as he relies on faulty ideas. He presents his argument by mentioning how materialism is unverifiable; that we cannot verify there is an objective reality, pointless; there is no need to posit an external world, and incoherent; our senses cannot be external objects.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Criticizing another culture without being crude, but what makes crude judgments crude? But criticizing culture is not that they come from outsiders, or people from other cultures, it’s that they are ignorant and insensitive to everybody’s feelings. The critical reaction would be that people are driven towards isolationism because many disapprove of the cruelty of the other cultures. But by being repulsed by the cruelty of one’s culture is by another a moral judgment about the culture. Although, we think like this, understating comes long.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Alexander Chin Mr. Vogt AP English Literature and Composition 22 November 2014 No one has morals. Morals are self imposed constructs that one chooses to follow based on their past experiences. It is not possible to reach any truths when it comes to morality. We can only modestly justify them by refuting other plausible hypothesizes. I believe in a theory based on doubt, Moral Skepticism.…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free-Will Vs Determinism

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is due to the explanations as to why anything within the world can have a determined cause. According to Edwin Locke, To deny the possibility that man can have knowledge, however, is a self-contradiction (Locke and Boyd). This quote describes that without knowledge and Determinism, we are unable to determine causes for the phenomena that occur throughout human life. He continues a point that without any existent knowledge, no determinists can provide valid statements because no knowledge can support the statement, therefore concluding it as invalid. With the accumulation of knowledge, modernly we are capable of expressing intelligible reasoning to situations that appear as “unknown/undetermined”.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was also not addressed that it we can never say an idea is true or false, because we cannot know all of the possible long term consequences of a belief. While I have showed strengths of pragmatism, I was not able to show it in a complete light or address all of its…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Cultural Differences argument postulates that different cultures have different moral codes. Hence right and wrong is only a matter of opinions, and opinions vary from culture to culture. However, James Rachel points out the invalidity of the argument - the conclusion does not follow from the premise. Disagreements between two different beliefs does not necessarily mean there is no objective truth in the matter, such…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory is implausible because it states that people’s treatment of moral goodness and badness of human actions which are the results after making a decision. This is made to be implausible because as people make decisions they don't rely on weather its good or bad and what happens after making a decision because decisions are what they are and one can either gain or lose from it it all depends on what you choose. That’s why this theory seems to be implausible because not every decision is suppose to be right every choice has its own outcome. The theory that makes this plausible is actually a law which is made by Kant and is the law of Natural Law. and natural law is based on the action one takes after decision making such as the aftermath of making the choice what they do and what effects they have on it.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality Vs Morality

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There are doubtless many people in the world that behave morally in some aspects of life and immorally in other scenarios. They choose when to be guided by their moral compass and when to ignore it. How can a person such as this ever become a just person in society? The person can start on the path of being just by not focusing as much on following a moral compass, which may be subjective, but instead on following objective concepts central to nearly all theories of morality. These would be the requirements of the use of reason and impartiality.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When faced with a moral dilemma, these theories may agree or conflict with one another. To fully understand how normative principles, justify morality, they must be broken down. We will begin with consequentialism, which is a future-oriented family of theories. Consequentialism states that actions are morally right just because…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Yet there is no one asking philosophers why their beliefs are theirs. A slight hypocritical view, that everyone else is wrong for there solidified…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays