Religion And Morality Analysis

Improved Essays
A man is walking down the street past a jewelry store and sees a gorgeous watch in the window that he would like to give his wife, but he doesn’t have the money. He goes inside anyway, picks it up, looks at it, and when the clerk isn’t watching he sneaks it in his pocket and walks out. This man stole a watch, that action is considered morally wrong anywhere in the world. Since this man committed an immoral action, does that mean he doesn’t believe in God? Philosophers have debated this idea back and forth, so I will take a look at both sides. I am going to discuss the relationship between religion and morality, whether they go hand in hand or not as well as how Immanuel Kant and other philosophers contribute to the idea. First, the relationship …show more content…
Mavrodes’ disagrees with Bertrand Russell’s secular views on religion, as he emphasizes his lack of religion and disagreance with the idea of God. Russell claims that morality does not need religion in order to work because they don’t go hand in hand. George Mavrodes rejects Russsell’s ideas and says his views cannot “answer the question ‘Why should I be moral?’ because the common goods are often just those that we sacrifice in carrying out our moral obligations” (Mavrodes, 194). Mavrodes’ doesn’t think secular ethics is a good comparison to whether or not religion and morality go together. He makes a point that secularists have no right to comment on the relationship because their input is biased and “deep” in their eyes is “matter and energy, or perhaps natural law, chance or chaos” (Mavrodes, 194). Secular ethics doesn’t go deep enough into the idea of religion and morality to truly understand it, according to Mavrodes. Mavrodes’ opinion, is just that an opinion, where it is not constitituted as right or wrong, but gives an alternate view into the relationship between religion and …show more content…
I do not think these two topics go hand in hand or are related in any way. Of the three ideas I have discussed, I can agree most with Immanuel Kant’s independence thesis and how religion and morality are independent from one another. I believe there is a God, but I am not extremely religious, yet I am still capable of making morally good decisions. I also liked Kant’s idea of immorality, how we are not perfect so immorality is expecting from everyone at some point. I think that for some people religion is a huge part of their actions, whether they be good or bad, but personally religion and morality do not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Biases In Religious Ethics

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (1) What biases do you believe most people bring to the study of religious ethics? Can these biases be overcome? I believe people bring biases of ethnocentrism to the table when studying religious ethics.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Blackburn Vs Greek

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Blackburn is showing that even religious people are looking at their own religion and trying to justify and interpret the text’s moral standards; this verifies that ethics cannot come entirely from religion if morals are assessed “to even our best religious traditions” (Blackburn page…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will talk about a theory known as Divine Command and the problem that hampers it which is known as the Euthypro Problem. To start off the paper, I will explain what the Divine Command Theory is and the main idea behind it. Next, I will talk about why this theory is so enticing to many people. After, I will reveal the problem with the theory called the Euthypro Problem, why it is titled Euthypro, and why it causes a problem within the theory. Later in the paper, I will discuss how the first part of the theory makes morality trivial and how it makes the concept of God always being good unimportant.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cahn's Analysis

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages

    First and foremost, I would state that I believe that Cahn’s arguments, with regards toward morality being independent of God and religion, remain justly founded. When looking at the world, past and present, societies have always been established by a sense of morals. Now, regardless of the spiritual or nonspiritual beliefs of different societies, there have always been a set of rules/morals that every person lives by regardless of individuals’ specific belief systems. Without this fundamental acceptance of basic rules and morals no society could be successful. I believe, those of us with an additional developed intellect, can make a consensus that religion stood developed out of necessity toward helping fortify and strengthen the morals…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is common for people to link morality and religion together. It is believed by many that morality is understood based on religion. “The Divine Command Theory”, states that behavior is considered morally right if commanded by God and morally wrong if it is forbidden by God. The theory also provides a strong reason on why people believe morality is something that they should worry about.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is there only one true religion? Is one of the already established religions the correct one and all the others are false? There are differences in beliefs among religions around the world and because of this, what kind of attitude should a person take regarding his/her own personal beliefs about religion? Should they believe that their religion is true, and all other opposing beliefs are false? Or is it better to believe that it is possible for many different religions to be true at the same time?…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, morality is often influenced by religion by making people think they will be punished after they die for doing certain…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory. Let us take the modified version of the divine command theory , as proposed by Robert Adams (1987); in defence of the original theory.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche And The Overman

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Richard Taylor, an ethicist said, “Contemporary writers in ethics, who blithely discourse upon moral right and wrong and moral obligation without any reference to religion, are truly just weaving intellectual webs from thin air; which amounts to saying that they discourse without meaning (Ethics, Faith, and Reason 7).” Does this effect that religion is the only way to explain morality? Friedrich Nietzsche would argue that morality itself wasn’t necessary. Merce Cardus said, “Envy is – Nietzsche recognised – an essential part of life. Yet the lingering effects of Christianity generally teaches to feel ashamed of our envious feelings.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The neurons in the brain work in coordination; some of these networks are dedicated to critical thinking and others to empathy. A link has been determined between the level of empathy and religion: the more religious an individual is, the more empathetic they will be. On the other hand, individuals who are more analytic find the idea of higher power hard to comprehend. Analytic thinking and moral concern signify two cognitive models and are always in competition with each other (Scutti, 2016). The general personality profile of a non-religious individual is highly associated with psychopaths; as they tend to have higher levels of self-centered impulsivity and cold-heartedness compared to their religious counterparts.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many non-religious people argue that morality does not need any foundation in religious belief. What is considered virtuous or sinful in many religions is purely what any human being – with good judgement – would consider being right or wrong. Morality in religion takes the guise of a reward system: do something good and you will be rewarded, do something bad and you will be punished. Even Socrates could find flaws in the religious occupied territory of morality. “Power doesn’t corrupt people, people corrupt…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Judgement Essay

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Moral judgement is a process which defines what is wrong, right, ethical, unethical, moral, or immoral. Moral judgement can also be defined as an expression of preference, opinion, will and command of individuals (383). Tom Regan and Mary Midgley both discuss the importance of moral theory and their different ways one can or can’t answer moral questions. Tom Regan focuses on the relativism point of view by expressing four different ways on how not to answer moral questions. Moral relativism depends on culture, legality, religion, and historical symbolism.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics