Medical Ethics: The Relationship Between Religion And Ethics

Decent Essays
The relationship between religion and ethics is extraordinarily complex. Nowhere is this complexity more apparent than in the medical profession, where many now-commonplace procedures violate moral guidelines prescribed by various religions. While health care professionals have an incontrovertible right to religious freedoms, whether they should have the right to withdraw treatment on the basis of their beliefs is a more contentious issue, as conflicts between religious conviction and required patient care have in many cases proven detrimental to the patient. This paper will argue that allowing health care providers to make ethical decisions informed by their religious beliefs in such cases where their decisions will detrimentally impact the …show more content…
These principles as follows; respect for the autonomy of the patient, beneficence and non-maleficence to the patient, and justice (19). In the case of the Jehovah’s Witness, no consideration is given for the wishes of the patient, and rather the doctor prioritizes his own religious needs over the needs of his patient; in doing so, he fails to act in a manner beneficent to the patient. Additionally, his actions had the potential to inflict “unnecessary pain, suffering, and/or harm” and thus, in accordance with Fisher’s definition, were maleficent (20). Furthermore, the principle of justice implies that not only that “health care providers… work for the public good”, but that all patients have equal access to treatment; yet, clearly, this patient was put at a disadvantage through his treatment being delayed (Sonfield …show more content…
However, this position falsely equivocates the two decisions through ignoring the fiduciary duty which the health care provider has to his or her patients. As Sonheim argues, emphasis mine; “A health care provider’s moral or religious beliefs cannot justify attempts to override patient autonomy… The right to withdraw from services cannot be used as a pretext for… denying patients’ own rights to care” (7). An examination of William David Ross’s theory of prima facie duties further reveals the incorrectness of this position. Ross’s theory contends that certain duties are “obligatory unless there are strong, compelling reasons to override them” (Fischer 13). Health care providers’ rights to act in accordance with their religious beliefs are one of these prima facie duties, as their importance is secondary to their professional duty to provide the best possible care to their patients; thus, when the two come into conflict, the former must be discarded in favour of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Neil Noesen Case Summary

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the 2002 Neil Noesen case, a woman in Wisconsin went to fill her prescription at a local K-Mart, only to be refused by the only pharmacist on duty at the time, Neil Noesen, because the aforementioned pharmacist was a strict Roman Catholic, and it would be against his principles to give someone contraceptives. In addition to this, he believed it would also be wrong to transfer the prescription so that it could be filled by someone else. The district manager knew Noesen would not dispense contraceptives, but was not aware that he wouldn’t at least transfer the prescription. In this situation, the issue revolves around the woman’s right to have access to birth control, and Noesen’s right to exercise his religious freedom.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Preterm birth can cause serious health problems or even be fatal for a baby, particularly if it happens very early (Weiss, 2015). In general, the more mature a baby is at birth, the better the chances of surviving and being healthy is. Ms. W’s case is no different; she is in preterm labor in the hospital, refusing treatment. Moreover, due to pregnancy and medication annoyance, Ms. W wants to discontinue all treatment, despite doctors’ orders. Ms. W’s potential risks of premature delivery will increase if she does not understand her medical indications, quality of life in association to risks, contextual features, and the way she applies patient preference.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Opposing Viewpoints Physician assisted suicide has been legalized in four states in the United States, but many places are proposing new assisted suicide or Death With Dignity laws. Assisted suicide is a very controversial topic and there is much debate over whether to legalize it in the United States. There are arguments for and against assisted suicide, but there is also a point that both sides can agree on.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We are living in a time when some doctors and lawmakers think the best solution in helping relieve patients suffering is giving them a deadly drug to kill them. Starting between the 17th and 19th century, laws have prohibited physician-assisted suicide. In 1828 the first U.S Statue outlawing physician-assisted suicide was put forth in New York. This issue has been addressed for well over 1000 years, and the majority has always been against the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Today, in 2016, the conflict of physician-assisted suicide is still prevalent.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors are expected to give care to all their patients without judging their actions or private life. Similar to Antigone, I have been presented with a moral dilemma in which the options include saving the life of my best friend’s thirteen-year-old son, or saving the life of a woman that developed cirrhosis of the liver due to her abuse of alcohol and drugs. I have chosen to not alter the information that would place my friend’s son at the top of the transplant list, due to the responsibility and the oath I took, to care for every one of my patients. It would be dishonoring to only think of my friend and how the situation affects me personally, and not consider the woman’s family and how the sickness of their loved one affects them. Due to my selfishness, I would be punished by losing the ability to save more lives, and do what I…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Ethics Case Study

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A mother Chelsea Reed and her son Justin were rushed into the hospital after they were injured in a car accident. Mrs. Reed has a head laceration and a fractured wrist. Her son is suffering from internal bleeding and needs to have emergency surgery to stop the bleeding. The doctor informs Mrs. Reed that Justin has lost thirty percent of blood volume and will be transfused before going into surgery to make sure he does not bleed out on the operation table. As a single mother, Mrs. Reed solely responsible for informing the doctor that she does not want blood to be used to increase the blood volume in her son.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    3. In the journal article, “Universal Health Care: A Moral Obligation?” Dr. Pies starts off by affirming that health care is fundamentally a moral issue and that religion is intricately involved in the discussion, providing…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors are sometimes perceived as miracle-workers that perform the unimaginable. They hold a difficult, strenuous, but powerful position in our society. They make decisions on how to perform surgeries, what treatments to continue, and inevitably save lives on a daily basis. With all this control over patients, you wonder whether their own opinions on morality is an input into their decision making.…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The delegating physician, the practice, and the medical assistant can be sued for negligence if the medical assistant does not perform a duty up to the standard of care of a reasonably competent medical assistant,”(Balasa, JD, NBA, 2015 (UPDATED)). This quote sets the tone of law and ethics in the medical field. Some aspects of our minds we control ; that we are aware of. However, some aspects of it are ticking in normality and we don’t even have to think about them, these are mechanisms of the medulla oblongata, the control center of basic motor functions. All our decisions of right and wrong, our conscious decisions are our ethics, in the medical field we make a promise to ourselves and others to do what's right.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another key aspect of professionalism I am going to discuss is medical ethics, Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles of biomedical ethics is the commonly used framework when discussing medical ethics. The four principles include, Respect for Autonomy, beneficence, non -maleficence and Justice. ((Beauchamp and Childress, 2001) According to Saint Joseph’s university, autonomy refers to the right of a patient to retain control over his or her body. (Joseph, 2017).…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Right To Health Care

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Argument Supporting of a Moral Right to Health Care In “Is There a Right to Health Care and, if So, What Does It Encompass?” by Norman Daniels, he provides numerous reasons that decide that there is such a right to health care. Furthermore, he made an argument for a strong right to health care that was derived from John Rawls’ justice principle of “fair equality of opportunity.” There has been a question that arises about “is there a right to health care?” According to Daniel, there is a right to health care and he made strong arguments for his beliefs by discussing the rights to health care, theories of justice, and equal opportunity (Daniels).…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a discussion about the Hippocratic Oath (“the Oath”), we consider the opposing perspectives presented by Robert Veatch in The Basics of Bioethics and Daniel Sokol, a medical ethicist who authored the BBC article, A guide to the Hippocratic oath. In this essay, we answer the question of whether the Oath is relevant as a universal code of ethics for today’s physicians. I argue that the Hippocratic Oath does not appear to be relevant to modern medical practice because 1) its philosophical basis is limited to its historical context and 2) it contains problematic language; however, the Oath does contain statements about the duty of a physician to a patient that can create the basis through which to construct a modern, relevant code of ethics…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the foundation and application of medical professionalism is very critical to the development of a healthcare professional’s medical career. As stated by Merriam-Webster, medical professionalism is defined as the conduct, aims, or qualities that characterize or mark a medical professional. In addition, privilege is an important characteristic related to medical professionalism. Privilege is a right or benefit that is given to some, but not others, and a special opportunity to do something that makes someone proud, which can also be used as an advantage that the wealthy and powerful have over others in a society. Privilege and medicine are often overlooked and undermined by those in practice, but it is important acknowledge as it can be troublesome when professionals forget their role in the field.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The four principles are beneficence, non-maleficence, respect for autonomy, and justice. The principle of beneficence states healthcare professionals must act in a way that does good by a patient and actively protects the them from harm. Healthcare providers must strive to improve their patients’ health, with the understanding that what is right for one may not be for another. The principle of non-maleficence is simply medical professionals should do no intentional harm to a patient. The principle of respect for autonomy is healthcare professionals must treat the individual as humanly as possible.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays