Relationship Between President And Congress

Improved Essays
In the chapters assigned for February 9th, the main theme that is in both books is the ever-changing power struggle in foreign policies between the president and congress. In McCormick and Ziv the sections talk about how even with the flaws in the balance of power between the two branches of government, there has been this reoccurring theme of this power swinging to one government branch to the other. Looking at this trend and when they happen, we can notice certain influence that causes these changes in who controls the power. Looking in the past we see time and time again that congress having the ability to control foreign policy decisions and them either giving most of the power to the president or unable to take reign on the president’s decisions. Yet, in the nations history we do see times were congress is almost at the other end of the spectrum with almost complete control over what the president can and can’t do in terms of foreign policy. The reason behind this vary but does have on thing in common which is the influence of the popular opinion in American society. As stated in the book by McCormick, congress has a very close relationship with the people of America, that is, they depend on being popular with them to stay in office. While can be a burden at times, when conditions are just right this relationship can benefit them as well. We see this especially during …show more content…
With this in mind, congress has the responsibility to not only act accordable in today’s policies but to strive to make the struggle between the two branch of government less of a pendulum swinging back and forth and more of a constant equal state of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One major constitutional relationship that is defined deeply within the author’s argument is the distinct power of U.S foreign policy and whether or not the president or congress should have the ability to declare war (48). Ultimately when the framers constructed the constitution, it named the president the “ commander-in-chief”, however the power to declare war was only available to congress (50). Eventually this struggle among the branches led to the future outcry of who should deal with U.S foreign policy. Also over time presidents began to exert their “ commander-in-chief” duties by sending troops to where they felt necessary and even began wars only to justify that they did so with nation’s interest in mind, all without congressional approval…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mainly because there are many reasons that a candidate can be elected into congress besides the constituents choice. A candidate could be elected off of interest group, campaign funds and just plain…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress is a very important function in the United States government and serves its purpose. Although,…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Article 1 section 8, it talks about how Congress can do anything to carry out its’ duties (Barbour, 2013). They oversee the executive and judicial branch. Their job is not just to try to do what is best for their state, but as well as what is best for their country. Because of this, they are the only branch that can vote on legislation or introduce bills. The most important…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this the incumbents, in a way, “monopolize” the congress. In the 19th century the turnover rate of each new congress was 45%, in the 20th it was…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Critics of the president’s power express their discontent at the president gaining power at the expense of Congress. Due to the vagueness of the powers outlined in the Constitution, many fear that the president can just run rampant and do as he wishes. When looking at the overall positives versus the negatives, the benefits of a strong presidency, namely unification of a country under an individual elected by the nation as a whole out, help rather than hinder our…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout the early part of the 19th century, the membership of the House of Representatives was very unpredictable and explosive. Very few individuals wanted or sought to make a career of holding to the position of political office and this caused the power of the congress to decrease. The committees that are powerful now were very weak during this time and so the speaker of the house has gained a considerable amount of power to be able to appoint what committees were needed. After a period of feeble presidents, when Thomas Jefferson was elected…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States government was created to have three equal branches, the judicial, executive, and legislative and was helped by the writing of the Constitution by James Madison. Even with these practices established, many Presidents and the government have decided and shaped United States politics by how they interpret and analyze the Constitution. Over the course of United States history all of the different political parties that arise read the Constitution in different ways and believe the meaning to certain parts of the Constitution are different. These conflicts have also caused many power struggles to arise between the President and Congress, typically when the two sides disagree and are controlled by different political parties, resulting…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In recent years, Congress has become increasingly polarized in terms of partisanship. The definition of partisan polarization is the separation of the two major parties as they move towards more severe issue positions. In other words, the members of Congress – both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate – tend to be either extremely liberal (corresponding to the Democratic party), or extremely conservative (corresponding to the Republican party). There are currently few members of the U.S. Congress that consider themselves to be moderates. Political scientists and journalists alike have speculated on why this phenomenon is occurring now, and some theories claim that this polarization is a return to the “natural” state of government,…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States government is made up of three branches, the judicial, legislative, and executive. Each branch has specific powers, some of which they share. Of the three branches, the executive and legislative branches are supposed to be the primary two holders of the war powers. I believe that through history it has been shown that the legislative branch and the executive branch are fairly equal with one another when it comes to their war powers. There have been several occurrences throughout history where Congress and the President have worked together and used their war powers to come to an agreed solution.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How California’s Government Differs from the Federal Government Each state has its own government that govern the people living in that particular state. The State’s government makes ballot initiatives etc. to help the maintain a democracy in the state. The Federal government, on the other hand, makes laws, treaties etc.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is called political polarization. Political polarization is the cause of recurrent stalemates, numerous fiscal budget crises, and a growing distrust in Congress and its ability to function. Polarization slows the lawmaking process, preventing new bills from reaching the floor and current ones…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Understanding the relationship between the president and congress is key in understanding American politics. Congress and the president cannot avoid engaging with one another, with a constitutional set up that demands they work together constructively. Congress has its roles to play in policy making as does the president. The president and congress are given certain powers in the constitution, that power is divvied up, so that neither one of these branches has too much power at one time (Fisher 2007). The founders of the constitution were very distrustful of the presidency and feared if the president was given too much power it would lead to demagogy (Dickinson 2008).…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is because it is the most powerful branch. The first reason is that they have the ability to create laws. Many people might argue that they can not get laws passed without the Presidents approval. Although this is true to an extent, it is not always the case. Congress can overrule the Presidents decision by simply getting 2/3 of Congress to agree that a bill should become a law.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Check And Balances

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Each branch of government has a check upon the other, and the two must balance one another to consummate the action. Even if each branch eyed the other skeptically, they were motivated to cooperate.” (Fox and Pope, p.94) The ability to check and balance is necessary in the government and in economics. Citizens of nations ruled by kings only serve the purpose of promoting the wealth of the king. Economies dominated by companies with monopolies don’t flourish, due to the lack of competition.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays