Free In Morality

Superior Essays
Morality and responsibility are two complementary concepts, one is the obligatory result of the other. Human beings engage in acts of moral code from one side and non-moral rules from the other side in social life. The basic questions of philosophy are, Is there a purpose of moral action? And Is man free in moral actions?. By the end of this essay, I`m hoping to show that human beings are responsible for their actions and also moral actions by proving how free-will and determinism works in this concept.

As an independent field from philosophy, morality is a system of rules. It is a system of norms or values established to regulate people`s actions and their relations with each other. But first, we must look at how hard determinism and
…show more content…
A free-will, in general, is the individual`s fulfillment of his wishes without pressure or coercion. In order to be able to evaluate human actions as “virtuous”, “positive”, or “negative”, they must be freely and willingly done. That been said, responsibility requires free-will. Libertarianism explains this idea very well that people have a seperation between their moral self and personality. The personality is the one that can be predicted by the laws. Yet, it is the opposite of moral essence, the moral self can resist personality suggestions. Thus, this is a big challenge I want to take up in here because most libertarians view of free-will can be reconciled with modern technology and science. However, libertarianism has empirical evidence that we all have experience of making decisions. To prove the relation to the given statement, human beings are responsible for the decisions they make as they have the experience. Therefore, it is not as if we do not recognize our free-will limitations, an argument has a balanced meaning on the subjective …show more content…
Now I see the answers to some of these questions. Let`s start with the basic question. “Is there a purpose of moral action ?.” Almost all of the philosophers on this question have said that there is a purpose for moral action. But they argued differently about what the purpose of the moral action was.According to some happiness, according to some benefit, according to whom pleasure. Of course, discussing the purpose is not enough to explain everything about our moral actions. In this case, we must look at the free-will. “Is man free in moral action ?.” There are different opinions on this question. One is the indeterminist view that human actions are free, and the determinist view that the other is not free. Thus, the will and the actions of man are determined by internal end external causes. These reasons, prevent the individual from making free decisions. Although, our moral actions are the products of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In “Of the System of Man’s Free Agency” D’Holbach explains his argument that human action is determined by the laws of nature. He proposes that humans are part of the natural world and therefore governed by necessary laws, so they have no free will. On this essay I will argue that D’Holbach’s argument on motive is not a good one; I will explain the argument, present why do I think the argument fails and consider ways to defend the argument from my own attack. D’Holbach’s Argument D’Holbach concedes that “To be undeceived on the system of his free agency, man has simply to recur to the motive by which his will is determined; he will always find this motive is out of his own control. It is said: that in consequence of an idea to which the mind gives birth, man acts freely if he encounters no obstacle”.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this article, W.T Stace defends the view of compatibilism, which is also known as “soft determinism.” He argues that every event in one’s life is inevitable and is the result of past affairs, which also leads him to the belief that free will is indeed consistent with determinism. Near the end of the article he also explores the notion of moral responsibility and it’s compatibility with free will. Stace begins by briefly outlining the significance of free will because if someone has no control over their actions how can they be punished or rewarded for the way the act? He believes that many people entirely deny the concept of free will.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, the free will problem, pertaining to philosophical nature, will be introduced and explained so that the reader can grasp the foundation of this essay’s main focus. The main focus of this essay is A.J. Ayer and his argument for compatibilism. The argument for compatibilism, according to Ayer, is that a choice that one makes cannot be free unless it is caused. Ayer also suggests that a person can only be held morally responsible for their actions if they had the ability to choose otherwise. This may sound confusing right now, but it will make sense soon.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For centuries philosophers have been debating the concepts of free will and whether it exists or it’s a mere illusion. Over the years, many different theories have been hindering the answer behind this complex concept. Many different philosophers discuss different ideals such as compatibilism and determinism. Both the combatalist and the hard determinist feel there's no escaping fate, however there differences lies on one major concept — free will. Even though an individual's fate may remain fixed, the compatibilist view concludes that humans still possess free will.…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reconciliation of moral responsibility and freewill allows us to understand how having freewill forces humans to believe that their behaviors and doings are morally responsible because their actions are caused naturally and or are determined. The question here is what is free will? Historically speaking, it is the action of acting freely; meaning everything is done causally due to the person. Free will and moral responsibility go hand in hand, but the issue is can a person really be in control of these things they had no control over? The problem with free will is that we believe determinism is true, but also that we are morally responsible; meaning we are held responsible for the actions we choose.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the “Problems of Philosophy”, Chapter 9: “The Debate Over Free Will”, James Rachels and Stuart Rachels, investigate over freewill. Throughout the chapter the authors discuss what free will means and the ways to evaluate if we are free. The chapter moves towards the Free Will Argument using the Determinist Argument, the Libertarian Response, the Compatibilist Response and additionally covering the ethics involved with the chapter of free will. The chapter begins with the determinist argument which claims that everything that happens must happen, given the law of nature and the history of the universe.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan Are we free? - Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments - P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As autonomous humans we generally think we are morally responsible for all the things we have done. That being said, it is only natural to believe that for a person who is morally responsible for what he/she has done than they could have done otherwise. Meaning they could have do the exact opposite of what they did. This alludes to the question that many philosophers have struggled with, this being, what does it mean when someone says that an individual who acted in a particular way “could have done otherwise?.” R. Chrisholm takes this concept as the fundamental question in our metaphysics of action and has formulated many explanations for the so called “free-will problem.”…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay we will discuss free will, the Principle of Alternative Possibilities and Harry Frankfurt’s argument against it. The idea behind the Principle of Alternative Possibilities is that, “An action is free in the sense required for moral responsibility only if the agent could have done otherwise than she actually did” (McKenna, Pereboom). This means that in order to hold a person morally responsible, he must have had another option to choose from. This idea has become a key rule when talking about free will.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The discussion of morals and moral responsibility is deep-seated in the classic philosophical repertoire. A closely related matter, and a frequent objection to moral responsibility, is determinism, the idea that given the initial state and laws of the universe, all future events and outcomes are completely determined. Over the course of this paper, I describe a particular theory for how moral responsibility can exist even in a deterministic universe. One prominent view in the realm of moral responsibility is the libertarian stance.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction I. In this paper, I will be arguing for the following claim that we, human beings are not predetermined beings, but rather we have free will. It has long been argued that people are not free and do not have free will; that rather than having free will we live in a world that is predetermined. That our choices and actions are reflections of and happen because of a long line of other choices and action that caused the present, and thus we have a fixed future. This is just not the case.…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays