Relationship between Gandhi’s Satyagraha and Swaraj Mahatma Gandhi is one of the greatest and prominent philosophers that ever lived on the surface of this earth. He was born on October 2, 1869 in Porbunder, Kathiawar, India. (Selected Political Writings 5) Gandhi is considered the founder of his country’s independence and on every October 2nd, which is his birthday, is a national holiday and international day of non-violence worldwide. His life is full of successes that are worthy of emulation. One of his greatest legacies was the advocacy of nonviolent resistance and protest. Many of his great ideas formed movements worldwide in terms of globalization and global warming. As a lawyer, he resisted the proposal of a law limiting
…show more content…
For freedom to be achieved, a nonviolent power is needed. Gandhi emphasizes that none can be achieved without the other. For freedom to the achieved, it has to be through a non-violent ways. He viewed it as a relationship between a mother and an offspring. Swaraj being the mother and satyagraha the offspring is inseparable. He noted that if hatred or malice is added in the course, the meaning will change. Gandhi made it clear that if a little violence is behind any freedom, it definitely will not be recognized as satyagraha or …show more content…
This implies that both satyagraha and swaraj are two things that cannot exist without each other. For swaraj to be achieved, it has to be through satyagraha. Nothing can ever be achieved through violence. This is not completely correct. Sometimes, violence is needed to get the desired change which may involve using military force. For example, during a war, the use of violence is applied in order to defeat and take control of the situation such as in the Saddam Hussein’s situation. Gandhi will not recommend this because of his principles. For Gandhi to fight for his country’s independence, he chose to do it nonviolently, that way his thoughts and views can be seen and heard, thereby supported. This he did in South Africa, where he rose to defend fellow Indians who were discriminated against. Satyagraha and swaraj are inseparable because one cannot function without the other, otherwise, it will mean another thing entirely. To achieve results, both terms have to be used together. Victory gained without violence can be best described as an elimination of a deadly virus that has claimed lots of
For freedom to be achieved, a nonviolent power is needed. Gandhi emphasizes that none can be achieved without the other. For freedom to the achieved, it has to be through a non-violent ways. He viewed it as a relationship between a mother and an offspring. Swaraj being the mother and satyagraha the offspring is inseparable. He noted that if hatred or malice is added in the course, the meaning will change. Gandhi made it clear that if a little violence is behind any freedom, it definitely will not be recognized as satyagraha or …show more content…
This implies that both satyagraha and swaraj are two things that cannot exist without each other. For swaraj to be achieved, it has to be through satyagraha. Nothing can ever be achieved through violence. This is not completely correct. Sometimes, violence is needed to get the desired change which may involve using military force. For example, during a war, the use of violence is applied in order to defeat and take control of the situation such as in the Saddam Hussein’s situation. Gandhi will not recommend this because of his principles. For Gandhi to fight for his country’s independence, he chose to do it nonviolently, that way his thoughts and views can be seen and heard, thereby supported. This he did in South Africa, where he rose to defend fellow Indians who were discriminated against. Satyagraha and swaraj are inseparable because one cannot function without the other, otherwise, it will mean another thing entirely. To achieve results, both terms have to be used together. Victory gained without violence can be best described as an elimination of a deadly virus that has claimed lots of