Initiating Structure

Decent Essays
H1: There is a significant relationship between initiating structure and job satisfaction. Referring to last Table, Hypothesis 1 is rejected because result shows that there is no significant relationship between initiating structure and job satisfaction. The Beta value for initiating structure in last Table is 0.095, indicating that initiating structure has little influence over job satisfaction. As according to Hair et al. (2006), the bigger the Beta value, the higher the influential factor by the particular independent variable. However, in this relationship, the influence power of independent variable is apparently low. Moreover, the relationship also deem insignificant because the significance level is at 0.3, which is above .05.
H2: There
…show more content…
Furthermore, the significance level of this relationship is as high as 0.640, which affirmed that there is no significance relationship between leadership participation and job satisfaction. Hence, Hypothesis 3 is rejected as well.
H4: There is a significant relationship between ethical leadership behaviour and job satisfaction.
Looking at the last table, Hypothesis 4 is accepted. The relationship between ethical leadership behaviour and job satisfaction is found to be significant at the significance level of .000, which is lesser than .05. Moreover, ethical leadership behaviour also has the greatest influence on job satisfaction compared to other independent variables, where the Beta value of the relationship is 0.523. H5: There is a significant relationship between initiating structure and organisational profitability.
Hypothesis 5 is accepted as the relationship between initiating structure and organisational profitability deem significant with the significance level of .011, which is less than .05. The Beta value of 0.322shows that initiating structure is one of the most influencing variables on organizational profitability compared to other independent

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This means the probability of getting a critical ratio as large as 0.093 in absolute value is 0.926. In other words, the regression weight of Brand Awareness in the prediction of Purchasing Decision is not significantly different from zero at the 0.05 level (two-tailed). Thus the hypothesis of Brand Awareness towards Purchase Decision is not supported by the data and not…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In case of NIIT it was 1.47 in 2010 and it went 1.42 in 2011 and 1.16 in 2012 and came to 1.22 in 2013. On the other hand in 3i Infotech the ratio was greater than NIIT throughout. From this we conclude 3i Infotech is more risky than NIIT because they have more liabilities and less equity. • In table 8 total debt/equity ratio has been calculated. In case of NIIT this ratio was 0.64 in 2010 whereas in 3i Infotech it was 0.87.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In week 1, the T-value (df=95) is 1.848. This generates a p-value of 0.068, which exceeds Fisher’s threshold and therefore null-hypothesis is hold. There is no significant difference in sales performance when compare males (mean=4232.34) to females (mean=5227.86). In week 2, the T-value (df=95) is 2.828 and the p-value derived is 0.006. Here, the possibility that the difference is due to mere random chance is less than 1% therefore the difference in sales performance between males (mean=4175.92) and females (mean=5675.97) in week 2 is strongly significant.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The F-Value of 74.373 is representing that the model is significant and the four independent variables ie. Attractiveness, popularity, trustworthiness and expertise are causing 43.4% variation in brand credibility and the residual 57% impact is missing, which shows there is a need to test other variables that are not established in the model and can be tested in future researches. As the value of significance for Attractiveness is 0.44 that is greater than 0.05 specifies that the attractiveness has no significant effect on brand credibility. Therefore, attractiveness will not be a part of regression line. The value of significance for popularity is 0.001 that is less than 0.05 representing a major impact on brand credibility, the un-standardized beta shows that 1% increase in popularity of endorser will create 10% variation in brand credibility.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The 0.05 critical value p-value corresponding to the 10131 degrees of freedom in this research study was 1.962. The corresponding two-tailed p-value for this test’s t-score is less than 0.0001. By conventional criteria, this difference is considered extremely statistically significant. Because the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.05, researchers may conclude that the difference between the mean correct responses in the picture test and facial test reflect a greater difference than sampling error alone and may therefore reject the null hypothesis that these tests have the same mean of correct responses. The T-test score that compared the average reaction time for the picture memory test and the facial memory test subjects was 26.682.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    All this shows that the reduction of a price to zero is more powerful than a five-times-larger price reduction that remains within the range of positive prices. Another point that this experiment clarified is the hypothesis that consumers’ decision to buy a good is affected by the ratio of benefits to costs instead of the difference between them. It is argued that this causes the net value of a good with 0 price to be very high or even infinite as the cost of the good is 0. However, this experiment shows that the hypothesis is not entirely right. If the hypothesis was correct, there…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They measure the ability for a company to create sales with it assets. For the industry average, most of the ratios are reflecting a small positive trend though the years, only the receivable turnover has a negative trend meaning that it takes more time for the companies in the industry to collect the account receivables. Ross is also having a small variance in its trend, but it is positive just like the industry average. Following the industry average, Ross also has a negative trend for the receivables turnover. Ross has higher number than the industry average in receivables turnover ratio, this signifies that it is doing a better job collecting the account receivables; in the other ratios Ross is performing just like the industry average or a slightly…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Human Service Ratio

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Also “in terms of interpretation, the long-term solvency ratio should be at least 1.0 but as a general rule, the higher the ratio the better the organization is doing” (Martin, 2001). The ratio for 2002, 2003 and 2004 is less than the average which means that they have nothing to liquidate. If the ratio of a nonprofit organization is less than 1.0, the organizations financial feasibility might be in question. The organization in 2002, 2003 and 2004 is doing pretty good. There is no question if they are going to be able to pay or not.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of your customer support experience? Table 4.11 Sl.No Level of Excellence No. of Respondents Percentage 1 Very positive 16 26.66% 2 Somewhat positive 21 35% 3 Neutral 19 31.66% 4 Somewhat negative 1 1.66% 5 Very negative 0 0% 6 Never experienced 0 0% Total 60 100 Graph 4.11 INTERPRETATION: From the above graph we can interpret that about 62% customers believe that they got quality service support, however 2% felt not the same and reaming 32% remained neutral. 12.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Financial Condition Liquidity Ratio: In figure 1, the current ratio illustrates Imperial Brands ability to pay their current liabilities. Imperial Brands were not likely to pay their current liabilities in 2012 and 2013, since a current ratio that is below 1 is not a good sign. However, their current ratio increased significantly in 2014 and 2015, since their current liabilities reduced and their current assets increased. Moreover, Imperial Brands’ current ratio is lower than the industry current ratio, which illustrates that Imperial Brands is not in a stable financial condition. Activity Ratio: In figure 2, the total asset turnover demonstrates how efficient Imperial Brands is managing their assets.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays