Globalization And Crime

1009 Words 5 Pages
Many of us in this time define globalization as the procedure by which businesses and institutions improve international repercussion or start running on an international scale. Globalization has, without a doubt, taken the world by storm. Although there are a few benefits of globalization, from the top of my head – greater job opportunities in less developed countries, allowing businesses in less developed countries to sky by becoming parts of international organizations and etc. there is one major negative effect of globalization; which would be the widening gap between the rich and the poor. In this essay I will explain the three possible repercussions of this rising income inequality and these would be the increase in the rate of crime, …show more content…
There are studies based on proving that there is a direct relationship between income inequality and crime. Researchers nominate several possible explanations for the interrelationship between inequality and crime. Firstly, deprived members of a society may be more likely to suffer from displeasure and enmity as a result of their economic position or competition over lack of jobs or resources, resulting in a higher disposition for criminal-like behavior (Stolzenberg, Etile and D’Alessio 2006). Secondly, anonymous (2008) found that income inequality increases the reward to commit crimes. Lesser means of legally attaining resources are accessible for the rising number of poor who live in a bias society. Although there are risks of punishments, illegal means of gaining assets may provide better returns than lawful ways of attaining resources. Also, an extensive breach between the poor and the rich often causes an increase in crime by reducing law imposition spending in low-income areas. Wealthy parties of a society tend to focus on concealed communities, especially as the discrepancy between the rich and poor rises (Fry and Paulor, 2012). Bardhan et. Al found that wealthy neighborhoods or nations have more finance for the police than their less well to do counterparts, this results in a less effective police force or a higher number of officers vulnerable to accepting bribes in a rising number of poorer areas. Increasingly concreted wealth leads to a rise in crime rates amogst these poorer areas which are frequent in economically biased societies. In societies with a relevantly high degree of income inequality, state investments in diminishing income inequality is extensively more effective at dimishing crime than increasing spendature on law

Related Documents