Human Dignity Vs Practical Reason Essay

Improved Essays
The relation between human dignity and practical reason is the justification of practically rational viewpoint which argues for the rationality normative status of the concept of human dignity in the action. The stand of this relation argues for how all human agents must necessarily accept that they are committed and obligated to respecting the dignity of others and that this is a practically rational point of view without rejecting the substantive nature of human dignity as value and the prior authority of reason in the Kantian project of practical reason. On this necessary link between human dignity and practical reason two issues turn on: first, the existence of human dignity as objective ends qua the absolute worth of person, second, the …show more content…
By contrast, most Kantian constructivism treats these issues only under the idea of reason. They reject of independently claim of any value to ground the reason, instead they argue for priority of reason alone to any action and that might be comes out with any value (e.g, human dignity). As a modest approach, this distinction between and among the two issues can be developed and explained further under the progress–task reading for Kant as middle model. It can be set out from the idea how we must approach to practical reason with including human dignity. On this basis, we don’t start with the objective ends for the absolute worth of person ( human dignity ) then build upon it the practical law ( moral law) through the practical procedures, neither we don’t claim the practical law shall be structured through the practical rational procedures without the absolute value of person (human dignity). Instead, we start with the idea of practical reason from the standpoint of rational practically that includes the absolute value of person ( human dignity) as the content of maximizing the practical principles which are necessary and universally motive (given-reason) to validity test of our

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Provides a system for analyzing the key objectives of this book such as the background, key issues, and ethical arguments. Deontological response is inferred for analysis. Immanuel Kant is referred to the concept of the categorical imperative which there are no arguments that…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Kant

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill and Kant Kant and Mill are two philosophers with differing ethical theories. The crux of the disagreement between these two philosophers is that they both disagree on the methods by which we should derive moral rules and guidelines. Specifically, which guidelines we should use in deciding what is ethical, and which justifications we should use for the evaluating moral value of actions? Kant’s deontological theory attempts to answer these questions through a sound reason based approach. The strength in Kant’s theory is that it rests on a foundation of consistent obligatory universal rules, with an emphasis on the intentions of the agent.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this final essay, I was debating over whether to write about the moral principle about Kant’s Categorical Imperative or Mill’s Greatest Happiness principle? I have chosen to go with writing about Mill’s Greatest Happiness principle. Throughout this easy I will be explain what exactly Mill’s greatest happiness principle is. I will also explaining Mill’s view against two objective. These objectives will be mentioned in the last part of this essay.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Just Vs Unjust Analysis

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From this perspective, human beings have their reasons and man-made laws are distinguishable by moral reason alone. Specifically, the individuals of society are morally obligated to give reason to tell whether…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The consequentialism ethical theory speculations are basically right, that we ought to be seeking to make to best out of good. The Kantian thoughts of building quality in a self-government or the cooperative attitude that gives the best results of good. In Kant’s theory is focused on Morality and Rationality, what principles people hold on what is right and wrong. The good behavior versus the bad what type of character people betray when dealing with others. A person who is judgmental of others, and make a rash decision could lead to damaging reputations.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes when life and suffering become unbearable, death offers a welcome escape. When it is a question between seeking expensive long term treatment or ending one’s suffering altogether, assisted suicide, Death with Dignity, gives someone a choice whether or not to end their life. Death with Dignity refers to a person’s legal right to end one’s life. This “solution” to pain and suffering is often frowned upon for various reasons in many religions and by specific individuals such as doctors, nurses, and family members. Despite these objections, death with dignity should be legal throughout the United States because it gives people a chance to decide what is best for themselves, it costs a lot less money than a long-term treatment, and it ends their suffering.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America the Great “America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand.” These were the words of Harry Truman, the 33rd President of the United States. Because of our foundation of determination throughout history, America has, since its inception, been on a pedestal for the world to admire. America has been at the cutting edge in many facets of society, including technology, warfare, and social change.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lastly, Kant presents A priori ideas, which in term is a special kind of idea that tells you about the possibility of human experience, however these experiences don’t depend on experience that you have already had, but are supplied by reason in order to make sense of an…

    • 1295 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…

    • 1430 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea of moral equality refers to all autonomous, rational beings or persons as moral equals. In other words, all moral equals are all equally tied together by the moral law. Therefore, individuals should act based upon respect for the moral law. This view of Kantian theory implies that all moral equals should treat individual’s as ends in themselves. As stated in the textbook “Persons are autonomous, rational beings who have goals or objectives that they wish to achieve.…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. “How have humanitarian principles changed over time? In what ways have they stayed the same?” Humanitarian action is a great response to help disastrous situations. It helps with the suffering a human obtains and supports them.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle and Kant have one major similarity. They both feel that the reasons behind an action are important in determining the moral worth of that action. I will demonstrate the differences between a person of Aristotelian virtue and a person who has Kantian moral worth in the following pages of this paper. I will also argue why Aristotle’s view is correct. The major differences between Aristotle and Kant are how they deem the reasons behind an action to have moral worth.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the movie My Sister’s Keeper, Sara and Brian Breslin make the decision to conceive their daughter Ana through in vitro to donate compatible organs to their daughter Kate who suffers from acute promyelocytic leukemia. The ethical issue in this movie is the decision Ana’s parents made to go through with genetic pre-implementation with the specific goal of saving their older daughter Kate. The moral agent, Ana, faces moral obligations to save her sister by serving as an organ bank. She is at the center of an ethical dilemma as she has to decide what is best for her and her family.…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two approaches to the justification of rights, namely status-based theory and instrumental theory will be explained. The first, rooted in natural rights theory of enlightenment period, argues that in pre-political state of nature, men have certain unalienable rights such as rights to liberty, life and private property and hence under the governance of the state, these fundamental and natural rights should be protected and respected. The right to do a certain act, therefore, has not to be depended on interests which it brings about. Instrumental theories, influenced by utilitarianism, describe rights as instruments for achieving an optimal distribution of advantages. The optimal distribution is what contains the greatest aggregate utility.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays