Niebuhr scholars, for the most part, in the later years of Niebuhr’s life, have looked to other areas of his authorship in their assessments of his thought and ethics, with some exceptions. During Niebuhr’s later years, he is often read in relation to his role in international politics and especially in influencing Cold War policy. If the connection is made between Niebuhr and Civil Rights, it usually is mediated by his relationship to and influence on Martin Luther King Jr. While there are important lines to draw between King and Niebuhr in terms of strategy, theology, and politics, as this scholarship has shown, this emphasis also tends to cloud the fact that Niebuhr’s theological role in the Civil Rights Movement is not exhausted by tracing his influence on King and other organizers and leaders who valued his writings in one way or another. Niebuhr lived and wrote through the entirety of this period, producing a significant amount of public moral reflection which should be appraised on its own right, in addition to its connection with the question of
Niebuhr scholars, for the most part, in the later years of Niebuhr’s life, have looked to other areas of his authorship in their assessments of his thought and ethics, with some exceptions. During Niebuhr’s later years, he is often read in relation to his role in international politics and especially in influencing Cold War policy. If the connection is made between Niebuhr and Civil Rights, it usually is mediated by his relationship to and influence on Martin Luther King Jr. While there are important lines to draw between King and Niebuhr in terms of strategy, theology, and politics, as this scholarship has shown, this emphasis also tends to cloud the fact that Niebuhr’s theological role in the Civil Rights Movement is not exhausted by tracing his influence on King and other organizers and leaders who valued his writings in one way or another. Niebuhr lived and wrote through the entirety of this period, producing a significant amount of public moral reflection which should be appraised on its own right, in addition to its connection with the question of