Reign Of Terror Justified Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
How far should we go to be in peace and equilibrium with one another? Before the start of the French Revolution, the French had and unfair and unjust democracy. However, a group of powerful men took the idea of a more equal government too far. 1793 marks the beginning of the Reign of Terror, which includes the execution of outrageous numbers of innocent citizens and enemies. The question is: were these methods used to achieve a government full of liberty and equality justified? These methods were in fact not justified for multiple reasons.
External Threats from Foreign countries in no way justify the Reign of Terror. It was a reasonable action for Austria and Prussia to form an alliance to stop the French Revolution (Doc. A). If word of the Revolution would have spread to their countries, they would have a very big problem to deal with that would cost their countries millions and spread violence throughout their countries. Austria was also concerned about Queen Antoinette’s safety, which they had reason to be concerned about
…show more content…
In October 1793, Revolutionaries destroyed 1600 homes and chopped off 12 heads in five minutes (Doc. C). The reason Revolutionaries did this was just to make an example of counterrevolutionaries, which is a very lame reason to set citizens’ homes on fire and to murder 12 innocent people. Historians estimate that anywhere between 80,000 and 500,000 French people on both sides died in the Vendee in 1793 (Doc. C). France was destroying itself from the inside out due to their fear of the internal threats. People in Vendee fought against a Revolutionary military draft called levee en masse and against laws that tried to abolish Christianity in France (Doc. C). French Government officials shouldn’t be sending out military drafts to kill their own people, let alone rid the French citizens of their freedom of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Terror was not simply the moment at which the French government unleashed its violence against its own people. The Terror, as it was seen during the Revolution itself, was rather a way by which one chose to think; it was, in essence, a rejection of monarchy and a willingness to proclaim full separation from the former rulers of the nation. This notion was perceived as an effort to intimidate the upper classes to enforce a new ideological era, not simply to employ physical violence against suspicious individuals. When Robespierre famously proclaimed that virtue and terror needed to be combined during the French Revolution, his message was not intended to be a justification of outright cruelty, but instead a compelling commentary on precisely how intimidation needed be used to threaten the royalist ideology. Indeed, while this was the valid historical use of the term, many abused its connotations and took it upon themselves to officiate a barbarous corporeal war against the French Republic’s supposed…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Was the Reign of Terror Justified? During the French revolution an estimated 40,000 people were gruesomely beheaded. Most of these deaths occurred during a time called the Reign of Terror. At the time, mostly due to economic troubles and income inequality, there was chaos and a call for the end of the monarchy whose corruption knew no bounds.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror Dbq Essay

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This argues that the Reign of Terror was necessary to rescue France from invasion. The Austrians invaded because Queen Marie Antoinette was killed because she was convicted by the Revolutionary Tribunal of high treason, and executed by guillotine on the Place de la Révolution on October 16, 1793. Queen Marie Antoinette was also the daughter of Leopold II, who was the king of Austria. There is no doubt the Reign of terror had many negative impacts on society, however it was essential for France’s survival.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Reign of Terror was a brutal time period during the French Revolution. It involved countless unnecessary deaths made by the officials. The executioners used the guillotine, or a beheading machine, to kill anyone who seemed suspicious, without being accused of anything. “Historians estimate that more than 80,000 French people on both sides died…” (Doc. C)…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reign Of Terror DBQ

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Is it right to persecute people because of their different beliefs? Before the Reign of Terror France revolutionaries hoped to create a government that would value people's rights and protect them from dictatorship. But sadly, violence was frequent during the revolution and individuals rights were ignored. During the year of 1793-1794 The Reign Of Terror began and about 20,000-40,000 French People were killed by the power the government holds. They were executed by guillotines , which were large falling blades that immediately eliminate an individual.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1791 the Bill of Rights created the first ten amendments to the constitution. The First Amendment was the most important to Americans because it prohibit any unusual or cruel punishments. It declared “that certain rights shall not construed to deny or regard others retained by people”. But the Bill of Rights did not change much, the American still fight for first amendment right so came the French Revolution, it was twenty-six years before Europe collapsed. The church was attacked because it violated freedom of religion and freedom of speech.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The French government was taking away rights by abolishing worship and religious holidays. Undoubtedly, the threats were not enough to be justified and neither were the…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many historians have found it difficult to precisely define a reason as to what caused ‘The Terror,’ this is due to it being a culmination of terrible events leading to tyranny. ‘The Terror’ can be defined as the period within 1793 and 1794, when the Robespierre subjugated Jacobian group executed, without remorse, any opposing citizens to their regime. Through the critical analysis of Maximilien Robespierre’s speech ‘On the moral and political principles of domestic policy’ in conjunction with Revolutionary France written by Furet Francois and other secondary sources, this essay will argue the differing perspectives provided by historians to discover a definitive cause to ‘The Terror’ through a common relationship that it holds with the theme of virtue. The context of this period being, the Industrial…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in article A, the "Declaration of the Rights of Man" was made for "the preservation of the natural ... rights of man. These are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression. " While this seems logical, The Reign of Terror took these rights away from every citizen of France. Every citizen was subjected to having these rights, and taking them away is absurd.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They realized that even the slightest criticism of the revolutionary government was enough to send them to the guillotine. The French government saw enemies everywhere. They believed that anyone who disagreed with the government was conspiring against the Revolution, and was therefore committing treason. Throughout the Reign of Terror, the government imposed new laws, such as the levée en masse, which was a mandatory military draft. Many French citizens rebelled against the draft (Doc C).…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The loss of so many lives in the French Revolution was not worth it. The deaths were of many people who were innocent, as they were not involved in the revolution. France became obsessed with violence, as this became their main focus. Concluding the revolution, the deaths did not benefit the outcome of France.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This part in the French Revolution will eventually end with the person who started it, Maximilien Robespierre. Although the Reign of Terror had brutal violence, it was justified because of the resistance of the revolution in France, the foreign threats and to protect the public safety inside of France. The Reign of Terror was needed to because of the heavy revolution resistance in France. A map shows the areas of deepest resistance to the revolution in multiple cities in France. The map illustrates that many cities in…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though Robespierre killed thousands of people, he believed he did it for the sake of the people to form a new government. As he stated, “Terror is nothing other than justice, prompt, severe, inflexible; it is therefore an emanation of virtue; it is not so much a special principle as it is a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to our country 's most urgent needs” (Terror and Virtue Letter). The Reign of Terror ended when the citizens put Robespierre on trial and executed him in 1794. Even with many deaths, fears, and changes…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One comparable result of these revolutions were the execution programs that emerged from them. In France, a program called the Reign of Terror, led by Maximilen Robespierre, had started. The purpose of this program was to institute a policy of fear or terror in those who dared to counter revolt. Although this began as a period of trials against those who seemed to oppose the revolution, it quickly altered into morbid confrontations where those accused were not allowed to defend themselves. Many were killed through the use of guillotine, an execution method of beheading.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Origins of Nationalism- Source Interpretation “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.” This was first said by Jean Jacques Rousseau in 1762, and is attributed to helping ignite the spark that started the French Revolution. The people in France during and after this period of time had vastly differing ideals on nationalism and the revolution. Some feared their increased nationalism and the revolution would not help them at all, while others defended it to their last dying breath. These statements bring up of the question: to what extent did the French revolution succeed in uniting the people and bringing about a better society?…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays