Rehabilitation is imperative with regards to its dynamics that can serve best in improving the mental health in former offenders once they are released from jail or prison. There exists a need for more concerted attention on the rehabilitation of wrongdoer to not become part of the already elevated recidivism rate which is something my anticipated agency will do its best to thwart in its tracks. This could very well be deterred as a result its emergence by way of undertaking a treatment-oriented ideology and hiring an abundance of psychologists to be given a counseling role to take care of them. It is after all fundamental for a cyclic fluctuation between the use of punishment and rehabilitation to exist in the American criminal justice system;
…show more content…
In the long run, the oversight of state courts and law enforcement policymakers might learn from my organization’s support for a punitive alongside rehabilitative justice model through specializing in matters more centered on therapeutic jurisprudence as its theoretical foundation given that they should not, “only function as a mechanism for dispute resolution, but must also deal with the variety of social and psychological problems that brings offenders into the criminal justice system…judges [to officials] need to seek solutions that address the causes of criminal behavior” (Parker, 2007, p. …show more content…
This holistic approach is based upon the need to change criminal and addictive thinking patterns in offenders. As a first step in the rehabilitative process, inmates must recognize and accept that they maintain antisocial behaviors. Based upon such honest realizations, inmates must next develop new behavioral habits in order to successfully reenter society. This therapy group served as an…relapse prevention program for individuals who have struggled with drugs, alcohol, violence, manipulative behaviors, and self-defeating personalities” (Nelson, Specian, Nancy, & DeMello, 2006, p.
In the long run, the oversight of state courts and law enforcement policymakers might learn from my organization’s support for a punitive alongside rehabilitative justice model through specializing in matters more centered on therapeutic jurisprudence as its theoretical foundation given that they should not, “only function as a mechanism for dispute resolution, but must also deal with the variety of social and psychological problems that brings offenders into the criminal justice system…judges [to officials] need to seek solutions that address the causes of criminal behavior” (Parker, 2007, p. …show more content…
This holistic approach is based upon the need to change criminal and addictive thinking patterns in offenders. As a first step in the rehabilitative process, inmates must recognize and accept that they maintain antisocial behaviors. Based upon such honest realizations, inmates must next develop new behavioral habits in order to successfully reenter society. This therapy group served as an…relapse prevention program for individuals who have struggled with drugs, alcohol, violence, manipulative behaviors, and self-defeating personalities” (Nelson, Specian, Nancy, & DeMello, 2006, p.