Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

Improved Essays
In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 3’s unwillingness and bias towards young people slows the jury from finding justice for the boy. Juror 3 had gotten into a fight with his son and has not talked to him since then. Therefore, the theme of the story is that pain from previous relationships leads to anger and prejudice towards new things and people.

Juror 3 is angry towards kids because of his past experiences with his son. When the other jurors questioned the boy’s innocence he became furious because of his bias. After four of the jurors voted ‘not guilty’ the third juror lost his cool. His anger is shown when he said ”I mean, everybody’s heart is starting to bleed for this punk little kid..”(Reginald 41) Because the defendant is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This is very important because it gives the possibility that someone else might have committed the murder rather than the boy. This also gets some of the other jurors that little extra push to get them to join the non-guilty side. Literary Conclusion: In conclusion, Juror Five’s change in personality from Act One to Act Three is a crucial part in the Jurors deliberations Value: Twelve Angry Men describes what many of us fail see in social situations, dynamic personalities. And the effect these can have on a discussion, or in this case, a life. Many Jurors seem to stay static throughout the play, such as Juror Eight or Seven.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, Minority Matters: 12 Angry Men as a Case Study of a Successful Negotiation, by Eirini Flouri and Yiannis Fitsakis, meticulously analyses multiple strategies and angles taken by juror 8 in the film 12 Angry Men. The article examines what factors contributed to juror 8’s success and the ever changing tactics juror 8 uses to gain supporters for his cause. The negotiation is held to decide the fate of an eighteen year old minority, which allegedly murdered his father. The elements surrounding the negotiation are 12 jurors in a hot conference room, no relationships formed prior to negotiation and none expected or necessarily desired as an outcome. The jurors answer only to themselves and to the law, grounded in the expectation by…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    12 Angry Men Momentum

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Claim: The most important/significant message in 12 angry men is that momentum creates the majority. Establish Evidence: The story of 12 Angry Men starts out with the 8th juror being alone and having no one to back him up. Evidence: This is explained on page 12 from the 8th juror, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’.” Analysis: This scene symbolizes the theme of the story because it shows how there is absolutely no momentum or evidence to back up the not guilty side at first. This was a very strong part of the book because it really develops the 8th juror with how his personality is very calm, confident and empathetic.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the jury, Juror 3 and Juror 8 are arguing about how the boy is guilty or not. They argue like annoying children that can’t get over themselves, and Juror 11 announces, “... We have a responsibility. This is a remarkable thing about democracy. That we are … notified by mail to come down to this place - and decide on the guilt or innocence of a man; of a man we have not known before.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Similarly, juror three has prejudice against the defendant as this boy reminds him of his estranged sons perceived ingratitude and he rails against every argument that does not support what he already believes because “that’s how kids are nowadays”, although this is only revealed as the play…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Themes

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The eighteen-year-old was alleged for stabbing his father to death. Eleven out the twelve jurors found the boy to be guilty while one juror claims that he is not guilty on the grounds that there is not enough evidence. One by one, this juror convinces each man that their decision towards the boy being guilty is based on assumptions rather than fact. In the end, the vote was unanimous, the teenager was not guilty. Throughout the movie, there are many different themes.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Quick Recount Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose follows the account of a court trial in 1957 America, with a nineteen year old boy who is on trial for the homicide of his abusive and oppressive father. The jury, consisting of twelve men of varying ages and backgrounds, are locked in a room in order to deliberate and consider the future of the young man. All of the evidence and eye-witness accounts put forward are against the young man and if given a guilty verdict is reached, the punishment will be death. In the play they are not referred to by their names, but rather the number corresponding to their juror position for example, Fifth Juror or Tenth Juror. Justice…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the meeting had officially started, juror #10 reveals his preconception of the defendant by stating that the neighborhood from which the boy resides produced “kids [that] run wild” and hinting that perhaps the father deserved what happened (Dirks, 2014). Juror #10 continued to be very open of his prejudice against the boy and where he was from, making generalizations such as that “it’s in their nature [to be] violent” and “they’re no good, not one...” (Dirks, 2014). It is in these remarks that it becomes obvious that his vote of guilty is a result of his prejudice rather than subjective…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Movie Review Originally written as a screenplay by Reginald Rose, and now considered a cinematic classic, Twelve Angry Men chronicles the story of twelve jurors who must come together to deliberate the guilt, and ultimately determine the fate of an eighteen-year-old boy on trial for the murder of his father. In particular, the movie focuses on one dissenting juror, Juror 8, who initially appears to be the sole person not absolutely convinced of the boy’s guilt, and follows his journey of convincing the other eleven jurors of the boy’s innocence. Though this movie was produced in 1957, the main character, Juror 8, demonstrates leadership skills that are still applicable today. Throughout his arduous journey of convincing the other jurors of the defendant’s innocence, Juror 8 is ultimately successful because he is able to rely on his leadership skills.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This quote reveals the true side of juror 3 and his genuine motivation towards the boy on trial and how juror 8 is uncluttered by personal biast. 8th juror as a spokesperson for justice and a great example of reverse prejudice concedes the fact that he “cannot send a boy off to die without talking about it first.” (page 7) Many of his quotes deeply shows his fortitude and aptitude to scrutinize the proof to guarantee the undisputable nature of his misconduct. Juror 8 presents an idea of concern and empathy towards the defendant.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The following paper will be about juror #3, or rather, Jerry. Jerry is a fascinating individual with a deeply rooted disdain for children. One could imagine that it came from his rough upbringing with his own father that caused him to begin to see kids in much the same way as his father did. Jerry has always had a rough time maintaining social relations due to his narrowmindedness on almost every subject which leads him to have a short temper. Once his mind is focused on one set of beliefs, he seems to maintain the same belief regardless of anything and everything that could prove him wrong.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A jury of twelve men are locked in a deliberation room where they decide the verdict of the young man, a guilty verdict would result in the death penalty. All evidence is against the young man and eleven jurors believe that the young man is guilty, however one juror votes not guilty. Juror Eight wants to discuss the trail and analyze the evidence further, he undermines the eleven-juror’s confidence of a guilty verdict when they analyze the evidence further, realizing that the murder weapon is easily available to anyone and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. In the end of the film the jurors come to a verdict of not guilty after realizing the faults in the evidence. Throughout the film all twelve men argue the fate of the accused.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays