Importance Of Justice In 12 Angry Men

Improved Essays
The quality of life itself is based upon twelve individuals. Accordingly, quality is far more essential to life than quantity. As each individual has different perspectives of fairness, emotion and empathy contribute to the sense of fairness. On the other hand, logic is a diverse judgement of the rights and wrongs, the do’s and don'ts established by ethics and ethos. Second chances are possible, but not entitled. Ultimately, in court, the death penalty should serve as a sentence on certain situations. Reginald Rose’s, 12 Angry Men demonstrates the importance of the well known statement, innocent until proven guilty. An eighteen year old boy being accused guilty by eleven jurors who assume fairness and logic are intertwined.

Having a persuasive argument for the right reason is essential in the name of law. Defending someone with believed proper logic for the sake of fairness is shown throughout the film. As
…show more content…
As humans go through life expressing the good and bad to anyone who puts themselves in their sights. One of the opposing eleven jurors stated, “The boy killed his father because kids are disrespectful and ungrateful” (Rose, 1957, Twelve Angry Men) this shows a judgemental, hasty generalization towards all youth. This statement represents no logic and fairness to kids; not all kids are disrespectful and ungrateful, but this one opinion was attempting to persuade the other eleven men to think that. For fairness to be present it requires logic to shape it over any given amount of time. Even though irrevocable mistakes can be made, nothing said or heard in a courtroom can fully be accounted for. Essentially outside influences can over power logic and fairness where prosecutors withhold information to plea a desired way like how Juror 3 showed resemblance to at the beginning of the debate between the twelve men. Mistakes can be made, but not erased, Juror 8 potentially saved a life by arguing the known

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    A man is innocent until proven guilty. In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose a young man is accused of first-degree murder for the killing of his father. The young man is only sixteen years old. He grew up in a slum his whole life, lost his mother at a young age, and has been beaten majority of his life by his father. If found guilty of murder, he will be sentenced to the death penalty.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reginald Rose uses reasonable doubt that is often portrayed in many real life juries mostly because of facts or opinions and consideration. In the play "Twelve Angry Men", Juror number Eight, is standing…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, Juror 3’s unwillingness and bias towards young people slows the jury from finding justice for the boy. Juror 3 had gotten into a fight with his son and has not talked to him since then. Therefore, the theme of the story is that pain from previous relationships leads to anger and prejudice towards new things and people. Juror 3 is angry towards kids because of his past experiences with his son.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By doing this he was able to create doubt against all the jurors. It all started when Juror 8 raised his hand and voted “not guilty” and said, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’. It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it” (Rose 12). By having doubt and wanting to look at the case from multiple perspectives, Juror 8 was able to start a conversation and. On the other hand, Juror 3 seemed to be convinced as soon as he walked to the courtroom.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the jury hold the boy’s fate in their hands since they are the ones that decide if he is guilty or innocent. There are so many discussions between the people of the jury because their opinions change so often. When the case is first brought to court eleven of the twelve jurors were ready to deem him guilty of the crime without even holding a discussion, but after a…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Conflict and more characterization about the juror is the result. Twelve different men are present in the jury. All twelve of them have a different point of view. With many of their different views, backgrounds, and personal experiences, it all ties into the jury's final decision .…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The film “12 angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty?…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A fundamental aspect of the American justice system is the right of every person accused of a crime, to a trial by jury. The defendant, presumed ‘innocent until proven guilty’, has the right to be judged by a group of his or her peers based on the evidence presented, the assumption being that the defendant will be judged in a fair and impartial manner. However, human beings are fallible and can be subject to faulty reasoning, alongside irrational and biased thinking. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reginald Rose is set in a mid twentieth century American jury room. Twelve strangers, all male, are brought together to deliberate the facts of a seemingly straightforward case, a young man accused of murdering his father; their decision, which must be unanimous, will either take, or save a young mans life.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are a number of biases among the jurors. Juror 3 just hates slum dwellers and juror 7 wants to pass a guilty verdict quickly so that he can catch the baseball game. Juror ten also segregates society in terms of racial and social class.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the jury deliberation every single man but one believed that this particular case would result in a unanimous guilty verdict. When the men went around the table to announce their verdicts of guilty or not guilty every man raised their hand in a guilty verdict besides one. Juror eight was the only man who walked into that deliberation room with doubts about whether or not the boy did in fact murder his father. Every man that was apart of the jury had their own reasons as to why they believed with every ounce of their being that the verdict was nothing other than guilty. Along with those men and their particular beliefs as to why the boy was guilty also came a window into the men’s lives.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #8 In the play “Twelve Angry Men” the Juror No.8 was a very important character, without him there would not have been any conflict and the young boy would have been executed without a proper trial. An Architect by profession, he stood out from the rest of jurors. He had the gift for intuitive thinking, understanding complex human relationships and inspiring others. He believed in trial-by-jury system and did his best to have the necessary procedures to come up with a fair outcome.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, juror number eight was able to see past the stereotypes attached to the defendant. Free of bias and believed in fairness and justice. He said, “It doesn’t matter what kind of person he is…we owe him a few words is all.” He understood that prejudice endangers the process of a fair trial and makes a profound statement when he said, it’s very hard to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. The jury was able to overcome their prejudice and stereotyping to recognize the gravity of their purpose.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie, 12 Angry Men is about twelve white men deciding the jail sentence of an 18-year old boy who has allegedly committed murder by killing his father. If the men do decide the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt then the boy will be sent to an electric chair for a death sentence. In the very few scenes of the movie all the jurors are summoned into one room and standing towards the door. Juror number 1, also known as the foreman is the leader of the deliberation. He tells everyone to gather around a table and explains that the goal of the day’s deliberation is to vote on the sentence of the boy’s guiltiness and innocence.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays