In nearly all of my responses, from the beginning of the course, I started out by saying, “I understand,” or something containing the same meaning. I have come to learn that this is not something you want to say to a client. When it comes down to it, I do not understand what they are going through. It does not matter how much I have learned about the problem they are faced with. I have never been through what they are going through, and even if I have, their experience …show more content…
While I used the phrase “I understand” two time in my second attempt, it was more to say that I understand where they are coming from, rather than I knew how they were feeling. In my first attempt, it is clear that I wanted to solve the problem that was being discussed. I did not have any regard for how they were feeling, or the emotions behind their words. Before this class, I feel as though we are only taught to fix the problem. We set goals and our sole focus is placed on meeting those goals. After that, we move on to a new set of goal. Along the way, I think that we forget that we are working with people, not a diagnosis. The clients emotional well-being is just as important as the speech therapy. These clients have important emotions and we, as clinicians need to remember this and acknowledge those emotions. While I think I did a better job on the second response, there are some places that still need a significant amount of work. In my second response, there are a few places where I showed more concern for the child, or the person with the diagnosis, than the family member that was expressing concern. For example, for the first statement, I wanted to know how the child responded to being made fun of. It wasn’t until after I