District Court Observation

Improved Essays
I visited the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on February 10. This court is a federal district court and it is in the fourth position from the top, Supreme Court in the structure of the federal court system. District court has general trial jurisdiction. The Courthouse is consisted of 6 floors and each judge has his or her own courtroom. The district court and the United States Bankruptcy court are in the same building. Regarding a courtroom, when I entered there, I could see prosecutors/plaintiffs seats on the left side and defendant seats on the right side. The different point was that in my country courts, there is no two tables in front of the jury box, but in the US they have. Jury box, although there were no …show more content…
Accrediting Council For Independent Colleges And Schools (ACICS). ACICS is the biggest non-profit education accrediting corporation recognized by the Department of education. It accredits and oversees degree-granting, career-related institutions. The center of legal issue was whether any entity or person has engaged or is engaging in unlawful acts and practices in connection with accrediting for-profit colleges. The purpose of this legal proceeding was to the court accepted a demand from CFPB to civil investigation into ACICS. Plaintiff argued that it is not permitted for ACICS to custody entity and it is a violation of consumer protection. Also they claimed the authority that bureau has to regulate activity. Against this argument, the defense insisted that the bureau has no law being able to enforce investigation and also the corporation didn’t conduct any action involving the bureau so that CFPB has no authority to investigate them. There was no result and I cannot come up with what kind of outcomes will appear since actually I’m not a fluent English speaker so that I couldn’t catch so much about the important matters in the trial. But not in terms of legal issue, I think the defendant seems to have a chance to win. The attorney of the corporation had a very impressive pleading and also answered to the every questions the judge gave to her compared to the defense of the bureau. The demeanor of the lawyer and the clarity of argument will help parties to achieve their goal and influence on the judgement. As far as what I could understand, I think the district court was not appropriate place for the trial since this trial was between government agency and corporation so that it would draw an attention from public. They could have opened the trial in higher

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That being said, just because a case comes to the court with a legitimate problem does not mean the court can rule on it. There is an example of this in the ruling of the apportionment case Baker v Carr and the cases that preceded it. In the cases preceding Baker v Carr the court could not rule because the cases were brought under violation of the grantee clause; in these cases the court could not rule because it could not answer the political question of what a republican form of government is. Finally, when Baker v Carr brought the same issue to the court under violation of the equal protection clause, a ruling was made. All of this is to illustrate that the courts only have select opportunities to rule on impactful policy issues, like malapportionment in Baker v Carr and like same sex marriage in Oberegfell v Hodges.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alabama’s has three appellate courts. Court of Civil Appeals, Court of Criminal Appeals, and the Supreme Court of Alabama. These courts have discretionary jurisdiction. The Court of Civil Appeals has five judges, they have jurisdiction in cases involving more than $50000 in damages. This court also considers appeals from state agencies and court decisions.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Judicial Review is a dangerous power that takes the form of an oligarchy that I strongly disagree of. The authority of the courts to have the power of reviewing the actions of Congress is dangerous and shall not be decided upon by the courts. It allows for that group to manipulate the system in their hands with what they believe themselves to be right and wrong or considerably constitutional. However, that is all too much for just a few people to have the decision to decide. I oppose this concept because it simply goes against what I seem to believe is the most important idea that must be carried out in all forms of the government which is separation of powers.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This situation created the start of a new and corrupt judicial system because prisoners did not have the chance to plead their case in court. Kate O’Hare, Jack London, and Assata Shakur provide an accurate and historical view of the American judicial system as unethical…

    • 1250 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. The Council of State, which is the highest jurisdiction of the administrative branch, serves as an instance of first and last resort, as a court of appeal, as a court of Cassation and as a government advisor (Ministere de la Justice, 2011; Cadiet & Amrani-Mecki, 2008). The Council of State is composed of state advisors and presided by the Prime Minister and the Vice president who is the Minister of Justice (Ministere de la Justice, 2011). There is a tribunal called the Conflicts Tribunal, which is composed of 8 members who are elected for a three-year term. In the United States the President appoints Justices of the Supreme Court, circuit and district judges if the nominations are approved by a majority of the U.S. senate.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Court found R&A did not commit malpractice as to the companies because Schneider, as president and majority owner, controlled this business entity, and her knowledge of the true nature of her illicit financing scheme must be imputed to her company. The firm had no duty to separately advise a minority owner. Stuffleben v. Cowden, 2003-Ohio-6334 -- Close Corporation Procedure: Defendants-appellants Gerald Cowden, Esq. and Cowden, Humphrey & Sarlson Co., L.P.A. (Cowden Humphrey) appeal the trial court 's decision granting plaintiff-appellee Brian Stuffleben 's (Stuffleben) motion to compel…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Which is why Ocwen never gave us a straight answer as to who holds this responsibility or who holds our note. FCRA Our claim arising under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s was not added to the amended complaint because as Pro Se litigants, we learn as we go. We learned of the violations after we amended our complaint. Our ignorance should not give Ocwen 's illegal business practices a pass.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bpc Case Study

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Srinvasan goes, there was no proper finding or channel conducted that could find hard proofs binding Mr. Srinvasan from commenting in spot fixing. Although with that though in mind for the court, counsel of opposite sit argued that Mr. Srinvasan used his name to hide any such circumstances to tie him for spot fixing. Also counsel of the opposite side argued regarding committee set up that jeopardize role of function by having unwanted over power authority to hide unwanted issues. But the court disagrees as the committee set up that are of two former high court judge would have any intention to over throw it 's function. Mudgal Committee was correct of allegation Mr. Gurunath however one cannot raise question to Mr. Srinivasan of their no only preemption of act rather than act perfumed and proofs that can be admission before the…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    DiNofrio contends that Abernethy’s testimony given at the grand jury proceedings satisfies these conditions. It is undisputed that Abernethy was unavailable as a witness and that the grand jury proceedings satisfy the first part of the hearsay exception. It is not true, however, that the prosecution had similar motive or opportunity to develop Abernethy’s testimony such that is satisfies the exception. The facts show that the prosecution’s motive to fully develop testimony was substantially less than it would have been at trial. When evaluating whether prosecutors have the same motive at a grand jury hearing as they would at trial, courts should use a fact-specific approach because it better reflects this Court’s precedent and the text of the rule.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    EDAD 524: Legal Case Study

    • 1355 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Once again this program has no terms provided for dismissal of the program. The bare minimum obligation of these contracts is for the university to act in good faith. Typically, in contract law, the courts defer to the university. Robert failed to meet many of the requirements listed to earn the degree, however there is no clear readmission policy provided. The university breached the contract because there was no language that would have made Robert know he was in danger of being dismissed from the program.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays