Rousseau's Community Theory

Improved Essays
Many people have different ideas of what a community is and what makes a community successful, but, overall, the themes of unity and cooperation come to mind. The writer Rousseau displayed his thoughts about community in his book, The main idea he discussed was that people must surrender their freedom in order to gain the benefits of functioning collectively as a group. I decided to test this theory by observing some of the staff members of a nursing home who are attending a meeting to come up with specific solutions for each residents’ weight loss problem. Every week the same staff members, which include the director of nursing, two unit managers, the dietary manager, and the dietician, meet to review the weights of all patients and, more …show more content…
One particular part of Rousseau’s t theory states that communities “must develop some sort of central direction and learn to act in concert.” The people attending the meeting appeared to be doing this throughout the entire time my observations took place. For example, the “central direction” they developed was the goal of creating a specific meal plan for each resident who was losing weight. One way the staff members showed to be working towards their goal was when each staff member gave suggestions for solutions to weight loss in general. These interventions for weight loss included verifying the resident is getting food they like, giving them fortified food, encouraging them to come to the dining hall, running their labs to check for other health issues, giving them larger portions, providing them with snacks, giving them an appetite stimulant, and giving them a house supplement. The development of this list of solutions suggest that the group has a “sense of central direction” because they are all thinking about the problem at hand, and they are all staying focused on the task. Without the ability of the staff members to think of general fixes to the residents’ …show more content…
One way in which they displayed Rousseau’s theory was when they discussed the exact steps they must take to get the residents the individualized meal plans. The steps they discussed involved each person putting their individual powers together to create a concentration of powers. The nurse suggests to the doctor to write an order providing the resident with the certain solution to their weight loss, the doctor then has to confirm the order, and the dietician manager receives the order and communicates with the dietary department to make sure the order is fulfilled. The outcome is the resident getting the proper treatment to help them gain or maintain their weight. This results in the staff members accomplishing their goal because each individualized person involved has their own will to do as they please but everybody is joining together and agreeing that the meal plans being discussed are the best solution for weight loss. Because of this agreement, each person is doing their part to get the intended outcome and giving up their power to the group. While the staff members did seem to display Rousseau’s theory, there was one instance in which the goal was not met. When they discussed the steps they needed to take to get the residents

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If men are equal, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau claims in the preface to his discourse on inequality (40), why do some men live in large lavish houses, while others struggle on the street, unsure of their next meal? The distance between the rich and the poor has been increasing steadily over the last decade, but in reality it has been expanding ever since man separated from Rousseau’s original state of nature. The state of nature is different than that which is natural, and within Rousseau’s state of nature, physical inequality is the only thing separating a man from another. Therefore, disregarding physical inequality, nature for man was equal and the state of nature provided an equal playing ground. As early as the preface, Rousseau realizes that in order for one to understand inequality, one must first attempt to understand man (39).…

    • 1335 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This publication was more accomplishing than the First Discourse; its content was what made Rousseau fall into the category of an Enlightenment thinker. The start of Rousseau developing his theories of “human social development and moral psychology”(Stanford Encyclopedia) can be seen. Rousseau discusses about two types of inequality: moral and natural (or physical). In the first half of the Discourse of Inequality, “The natural man is well balanced by his two trends, pity (which pushes it to the other) and self-preservation (which isolates). In marital status, laws and virtues play the roles of these two instincts” (Tim).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this paper I am going to summarize Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s “Discourse on the Origin of Inequality” in which Rousseau theorizes that inequality is not a natural event, but an unfortunate byproduct of modern life. I will then provide a criticism of Rousseau’s argument, focusing on his decision to not discuss the relationship between natural and moral inequality. This criticism will then be countered by a theorized response from Rousseau’s perspective. The general argument presented by Rousseau is that the establishment of civil society and the associated progress of humanity is the underlying cause for the inequality between men.…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide Opposing Viewpoints Physician assisted suicide has been legalized in four states in the United States, but many places are proposing new assisted suicide or Death With Dignity laws. Assisted suicide is a very controversial topic and there is much debate over whether to legalize it in the United States. There are arguments for and against assisted suicide, but there is also a point that both sides can agree on.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    INTRODUCTION Underlying Adams’ quote is the important question as to whether society is progressive and has positive implications for humans, or whether its implications are negative and corrupting. Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Émile Durkheim are two political theorists who battle in their writing to determine what is bad and what is good about society. This essay will consider how progressive or corrupting society is and in what ways, according to Rousseau and Durkheim. The essay will explore Rousseau’s argument about the ‘chains’ of society, and look at Durkheim’s contrasting view of the value of community in society.…

    • 2119 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Rousseau’s argument, men cannot be as free as they are in the state of nature in modern society and asserts that that institutions and structures in modern society contradict the freedom and natural goodness of man. Yet, a specific government may be able to provide its members with a certain amount of freedom that somewhat amounts to that present in the state of nature. He writes, in regards to the role of government, “Find a form of association which defends and protects with all common forces the person and goods of each associate, and by means of which each one, while uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only himself and remains as free as before” (Rousseau, 148). The ultimate goal of the government is to ensure the natural freedom of its societal members. The law put forth from the government should be a reflection of the general will of the community.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believes that a social contract is needed in order to preserve the community as it is becoming hard for everyone to survive on their resources…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “There is always going to be someone who is bigger and better than you.” This phrase that many children are told is true; however, does it have to control the way society acknowledges each person? As civilizations grew, social hierarchies became more prevalent. Critics like Jean-Jacques Rousseau started to point out how society has created “moral” inequalities which is not natural to man’s state. In Rousseau’s essay, The Discourse of Inequality, he points out how society has caused men to put each other in an unjustifiable category of inequality.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, Rousseau believed in the equity within the members of the society. He showed the close relationship between equality and freedom in his writing, especially in his book “The Social Contract”(1762). According to him, the nature of man is resistant to inequality by nature; it does not have to confront others, asking them to prove anything. Far from seeking concrete ways to achieve a society that respects freedom, Rousseau seeks a universal standard by which to judge the legitimacy of companies. According to his beliefs, “men are born free, their liberty belong to them, and no one…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When examining the question of whether John Rawls would consider Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s ideal society in the Social Contract fair, it is important to not only understand Rousseau’s ideal society more closely, but also understand what Rawls defines as being fair. First, the society that Rousseau proposes as the ideal one is based off of his concept of the nature of men. Men are born free and it is society that enslaves them, therefore, the goal of his ideal society is one that protects the people while also maintaining them as free as they were in nature. While to many philosophers maintaining security means renouncing some of an individual’s freedom, Rousseau believes that society can have one without the expense of the other. This only happens…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Answer the first Questbridge Essay Topic [700-800 words]: “We are interested in learning more about you and the context in which you have grown up, formed your aspirations, and accomplished your academic successes. Please describe the factors and challenges that have most shaped your personal life and aspirations. How have these factors helped you to grow?” How you think you showcase your standout factor: Shows all three of my factors by showing determination and an analytical approach to overcoming my problems and being supportive. Could anyone else write this essay?…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In bettering the society, Davidson supports her mother-in-law Inez Davidson educating her students to be “confiden[t] in [their] ability...to switch assumptions or methods or partnerships in order to do better. This is true not only for you, as an individual, but for the whole institutions” (Davidson 67). For a community to function well, not only do the individuals need to communicate with everyone, but must acknowledge that there are times individuals need to change the way they perform in order to create a working society. They must unlearn and relearn practices to make sure the system is operating.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    “Equality disappeared, property was introduced (Rousseau 9)”. Rousseau genuinely possessed empathy for the health, happiness, and labor of “good men” while Machiavelli did…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If ‘general will’ did not exist than everyone would try to run the state how they would like to, without much compromise. A state cannot run effectively if there are too many people trying to govern it, with a state many diverse ideas are compromised into an effective set of guidelines and rules to govern making Rousseau’s argument more…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Family Observation Essay

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages

    A natural observation was made involving a family discussing where to eat lunch. Each individual played an intricate role in the exchange, either with his or her direct, or lack of, interactions with the other members of the family. I will apply the systems theory of family to the observation and discuss the concept of power, and how certain sources of power were drawn upon during the exchange. The observation took place at a busy mall on a Saturday at 11:39 am until 12:03 pm after all parties left the area.…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays