Reed V. Reed Summary

Improved Essays
While states have a substantial amount of independence in determining what statutes they impose, those statutes are subject to being challenged as unconstitutional. Such challenges will be reviewed in accordance with the constitutional balancing tests to determine what level of scrutiny should be applied. In this case, Ann wishes to challenge a state statute that prioritizes the rights of males over females as an estate administrator.
1. Ann can claim a violation of the equal protection clause of the constitution. The issue of giving preferential treatment to males over females in the appointment of estate administrators was the issue of supreme court case Reed v. Reed in 1971. In that case, they extended the fourteenth amendment to protect

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    The Equal Rights Amendment

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Women deserve to have the same rights as men, but the reverse is true as well. Men deserve to be treated as equal by law, and not be discriminated against just as much as women should not be discriminated against. This is not an amendment to give women more than men: it is to make the rights everyone has equal. Also, other laws are brought up, but never specifically mentioned. Without knowing exact examples of laws that will be overturned and what harm they will do to the people of the United States, no real analysis or judgement can be passed on these laws.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dorrough V. Wilkes (2002)

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis Paper Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002) No 2001-CA-00117-SCT Jonathan R. Heshler California University of Pennsylvania NUR 714 Legal Case Study Analysis The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the case of Dorrough v. Wilkes (2002). This civil case involved a female patient (Gwendolyn Wilkes) presenting to the emergency room at Boliver County Hospital, being misdiagnosed and discharged by Dr. Dorrough, dying the next day at another hospital after emergency surgery and the patients husband and son bringing a wrongful death medical malpractice action suit forth.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of the United States v. Gordon, Tremain R. Gordon and Emily Jones, his girlfriend coconspired in robbing a bank in which Ms. Jones was employed with. Gordon enlisted the help of friends, Eric Carter and Ramon Mitchell in being part of the robbery because Mrs. Jones’ employees knew her boyfriend Mr. Gordon. During the robbery, Mitchell handed a note demanding money to the teller, Ms. Jones and she went along with the plan. Eventually, Ms. Jones informed Aubrie Miller, a coworker at the bank of the robbery and Aubrie Miller then relayed the message of staying calm and giving the assailants whatever they demanded. After their plan had been discovered by law enforcement, the assailants were indicted in which Jones, Carter and Mitchell…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The beginning When South Carolina seceded from the Union on December 20, 1860, United States Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of 85 soldiers were positioned at Fort Moultrie near the mouth of Charleston Harbor. On December 26, fearing for the safety of his men, Anderson moved his command to Fort Sumter, an imposing fortification in the middle of the harbor. While politicians and military commanders wrote and screamed about the legality and appropriateness of this provocative move, Anderson’s position became perilous. Just after the inauguration of President Abraham Lincoln on March 4, 1861, Anderson reported that he had only a six week supply of food left in the fort and Confederate patience for a foreign force in its territory was wearing…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court stated that existing provisions for state aid to financial public education did not violate the equal protection clause for both Federal and State Constitution. It was also not unconstitutional under the education article of the state constitution. This action had challenged the state’s provisions for financing public schools that was prosecuted by two groups. The original plaintiff in 1974 is the board of education of 27 school districts that are located at various places in the state and 12 students of public schools located in some districts. The original plaintiff felt that the system for financing public schools that was presented in the state, in which funds that are raised by locally imposed taxes by the share of the state’s money violates the equal protection clause at both state and federal.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bacchanal Case Summary

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A. Constitutionality of Bacchanal's Statutes Prohibiting Certain Types of Speech The town of Bacchanal, Nevada presents constitutional challenges to the Nevada state laws regarding: (1) the towns’ of Bacchanal Anti-Harassment Resolutions and (2) the Bacchanal Affordable Care coverage of the employees and their dependents at Heavenly University’s “Paradise Found” corporation. The Court’s task today is to resolve the issue by constitutional measurement, free of emotion and predilection. The first task to resolve by constitutional measurement as to whether the Anti-Harassment Resolution Section 1 and Section 2 have constitutional basis and are facially neutral and or prohibit unconstitutionally protected categories of speech and or conduct.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the question of whether a group of students’ rights under the first amendment are violated is asked. These students had written articles for their school newspaper, which they had then submitted for review to their advisor, who passed the articles on to the principal, Robert Reynolds. Reynolds found two articles concerning, and with the approval of his superiors, eradicated the two pages that these articles were on from that publication of the newspaper. The principal’s deletion of these articles did violate the students’ rights under the 1st Amendment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As a Supreme Court justice who aided in the decision of the Dred Scott v. Sanford case, I was in favor of Dred Scott. My decision was based mainly on the fact that Dr. John Emerson moved Dred Scott to the state of Illinois and later to the state of Wisconsin. Slavery was prohibited in both Illinois and Wisconsin, which was indeed a fair argument for Dred Scott, being that he has lived in both states for a long period of time, even married his wife, Harriet Robinson in the free state of Wisconsin. After the death of Dr. Emerson, Scott and his family should have been considered.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question that is at stake is if the Equal Protections Clause (which is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment) was broken by the anti-miscegenation law of Virginia).…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    PS1355 Unit 3 Assignment 1: Brown and Federalism Sierra Baltins Wednesday Judicial review is the court’s authority to check on executive or legislative acts to see if they are constitutional or not. The Supreme Court uses the power of judicial review to ban state and federal laws that go against the Constitution. If members of the judicial districts and circuits are unhappy with Supreme Court decisions they may attempt to pass a bill to prevent federal court hearings. This power has been used to point out that “separate but equal” went against the 14th amendment. The 14th amendment meant equal protection, and “separate but equal” made African American students feel inferior to white students.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US is known for being the land of the free, and for the longest time people left their home countries to experience the American dream. America was looked at to be almost a utopia, where everyone had equal opportunities, and everyone was happy. Without laws this would never happen, and thanks to the constitution, there were certain rules set in place. The judicial review is in short, the power for the court to decide is a law or decision the government made is constitutional, or decent. To start, the Dred Scott vs. Sandford was historical for using this method.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion of the Court: McCullen v. Coakley The Eleanor McCullen against Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts was a Supreme Court Issue in 2013. In 2000 Massachusetts Legislature created the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act which stated that a buffer zone will be enforced around abortion clinics to prevent interference between those who are pro-life and pro-choice advocates. The final ruling from the Supreme Court was that the buffer zones did violate the First Amendment.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Xander Kanalos Coach Blount 4th Period 14 March 2018 Dred Scott v. Sandford,1857 The Dred Scott v. Sandford case was the most impactful in the supreme court and in general to everything that is constitutional. The case called for a man who was a slave that sued for freedom in their state which was Missouri(slave state). This case was important to African Americans and the United States because of the laws that were put in place after this case.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has been a stalwart supporter of women’s rights and LGBT rights. Her rulings on cases concerning women's rights and as LGBT rights have continued the impression Justice O’Connor gave in her decision in Roe v. Wade that gender may indeed matter in rulings with this trend most likely going to continue with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan. She is considered as one the 100 Most Powerful Women and has spent time advocating for women's rights in the duration of her career. The question being is asked is “Does the gender of the Justices affect the ruling?” Women comprise one half, 50% of all human beings and American citizen so it begs the question whether men and women think different ways when it comes to judicial rulings…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Welfare Testing

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited

    In The University Of Pennsylvania Journal Of Constitutional Law, Celia Goetzl agrees: “Such policies stereotype, stigmatize, and criminalize the poor without cause” (2013, p.1541). Studies support the assertion that applicants for welfare are no more likely to have substance abuse issues than are the general public. Moreover, problems that have arisen with drug testing results due to faulty testing and results. According to Pollack, et al, “Suspicionless, population-based chemical testing of welfare recipients will detect some “true positives” who are drug-dependent, a greater number of “accidental positives” with complex psychological problems, and a larger group of “false positives” who have no apparent psychiatric (including drug-related) disorder” (2002, p. 30). In this study conducted over two a year span, “the categories of “false positives,” and “accidental positives” each outnumbered the “true positives”” (Pollack, Danziger, Jayakody, Seefeldt, 2002).…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 8 Works Cited
    Superior Essays