Recognizing Negligence In A Pedestrian Accident

Improved Essays
YOU V. THEM – Recognizing Negligence in a Pedestrian Accident Case

Biking or walking through a major city can be extremely risky. On average, every seven minutes, a pedestrian is injured in a traffic accident. Even if you are careful and you wear a helmet and other protective gear, you could still sustain severe injuries. As a victim of a pedestrian motor vehicle accident, it is important to know whether your actions could affect the amount of monetary damages awarded in your case.

Negligence: The Driver’s Liability

In most automobile accidents, negligence is the legal principle under which you would assert your cause of action. To establish negligence, a victim (the plaintiff) must prove four elements.

1) The driver owed a duty of care – all drivers have a duty to drive safely on the road, keep a proper look out, maintain a reasonable speed, maintain a safe distance, and obey all traffic laws.
2) The driver breached that duty of care – the driver can breach his or her duty of care by failing to drive carefully or by failing to obey traffic laws. This includes, but are not limited to, failing to stop at a stop sign, failing to yield the right of way, or failure to stop
…show more content…
As a result, you sustain a broken leg and $3,000.00 in medical expenses. 1) The driver owed you a duty of care to yield the right of way at the crosswalk; 2) The driver breached that duty when he failed to stop; 3) The driver’s failure to stop caused you (the plaintiff) to break your leg; 4) and you sustained $3,000.00 in medical expenses as a result of the driver’s negligence conduct. All drivers are legally obligated to exercise a duty of care while driving his/her vehicle. Typically, the major disagreement between the defendant and the plaintiff is whether the defendant breached a duty of care and/or the amount of damages the plaintiff is entitled to get as a result of the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The plaintiff is a girl estimated to be about 20 years old. She reacted very negatively when she first got out of her car, but calmed down after Mr. Fuller excepted responsibility for the accident and asked her if she was okay. ○ Liability: This is a case of clear liability as the insured defendant failed to yield the right-of-way to the plaintiff’s vehicle in the right lane.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this particular case the driver-Sarah Mitchell breached the Duty of care because the speed limit of the "jump the hills" on Edgewood Avenue was 40 miles per hour and Mitchell speeded up her car to jump the hills at 80 miles per hour causing the car to airborne and sideswiped both utility companies poles. For such reasons, Sarah Mitchell, Adam Jacobs and David Messer are guilty breach of the duty of care to act as a reasonable person would act. For not being reasonable person the caused the lives of Mitchell and Jacobs. As the evidence presented above, both utility companies will be accused of the actual cause of negligence which means that both companies will not be liable unless the causation of fact can be…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jenner (Defendant) experienced an epileptic seizure while operating his vehicle that crashed into Maxine Hammontree (Plaintiffs) bicycle store causing her personal injuries and property damage to the shop owned by her. Plaintiff sued the defendant for negligence and total liability. However, the court rejected to impose absolute liability. The case was appealed by Los Angeles County Supreme Court. Facts: Jenner (Defendant) has had seizures in the past, but not since the DMV issued him a license to operate a motorized vehicle.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niles Case Study

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negligence is consider tort and is a civil wrong committed against the person that the court remedies in the form of action for damages occurred such compensation. Negligence is the unintentional commission or omission of an act that a reasonably prudent person would or would not do. It is a form of conduct which is caused by the carelessness of the standard of care on reasonable members of the society; In the medical field it is consider malpractice. The person who shows negligence does not use their best judgment against possible risk. For example, in the case Dr. Haskins did not examine Kelly nor review his chart.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This means that your insurance company must cover your medical expense and lost income even when the other person is at fault. The only way the other driver may have to pay for the costs is if there is a serious injury. To meet this requirement, you would have to have significant scarring, permanent injuries or disfigurements. Since these descriptions are fairly vague, the courts would have to figure out if your injuries fit the “serious injury” threshold.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Involved In Collision

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When involved in a collision, you as a driver have several important responsibilities. To begin, you must stop immediately at the scene of the accident; if you hit and run you can be penalized and even get your license revoked for up to a year. If serious enough, you can recieve jail time up to a year, a fine of up to $2,500, or both. After stopping and observing the scene, a person should search for and help anyone who may be injured or in need of assistance. Avoid moving anyone who may be seriously injured and whose condition may be worsened by doing so.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pedestrian Accident in D.C. Claims Life Of Restaurant Owner WJLA is reporting that a prominent restaurant owner was killed in a pedestrian accident. Armin Amin-Toomaji died from injuries sustained when a car struck him as he crossed the street at Ninth Street and P Street NW. The driver of the vehicle remained at the scene of the accident. Alcohol is not believed to be a factor.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reasonable Foreseeability

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rick did breach the standard of care as he knew that Daryl was sick as he was the one driving rick to an appointment. Therefore, he owed a duty of care to Daryl to drive safely on the road to not worsen the condition of Daryl. In the case of Nettleship v Weston [1971] CA, despite it apply to learner drivers experienced drivers, rick being a taxi driver is an experienced driver, were used to judge the case. It was held that “even learner drivers are to be judged against the standard of the reasonably competent driver. The fact that a driver is inexperienced and incompetent does not excuse his falling short of this standard.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personal Injury Cases

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hence it is of utmost importance that you consult a competent Personal Injury Lawyer Lindsay as soon as you meet with an accident. Factual defenses Under this type of defense the whole claim is based on the fact as to who was at fault. But if the accident occurs in no-fault state, then the defense will basically seek to limit your liabilities. The court will follow either the contributory negligence or the comparative negligence rules. Comparative negligence…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Text and driving kills thousands of teens and adults every year. B. (Reason to listen): I have been a licensed driver for two years now and I have seen many drivers texting while driving. Throughout my four years at high school I have heard countless presentations over this topic. C. (Thesis statement with preview of main points): Texting while driving kills and injures so many every year and it is unsafe for the driver, everyone in the car and other drivers on the road.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Case Study

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Although University Heights did not drive the vehicle that hit Alice’s car, they are responsible for not terminating Donald after the previous times he was caught speeding and deviating from delivery to visit his girlfriend. Donald got into the accident while on company time, making the business equally responsible for his actions. Alice’s case against Donald and University Heights is based on negligence. Donald lacked the care to change his driving patterns, and University Heights lacked the care to change their employees. Therefore, both defendants remain liable for the accident that injured Alice and left her with medical bills and the inability to…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tort Law

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Negligence is conduct by an individual that drops below a reasonable standard of care and causes harm to another person. An individual has a duty to act reasonably when interacting with others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others. When that individual fails to act reasonably and thereby causes harm to others, that individual is…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the court judged this case as the plaintiff assume 25% liability which is regarded as contributory responsibilities, because the plaintiff also has the duty of care to pay attention to the cars which on his left side. At the same circumnutates, Li Min found guilty of contributory negligence as the result of listening to music and looking at the phone when she walked in the street. Then, for another point, Li Min quit the part-time job recently because of boring, so she was unemployed is obvious risk, it was not the guilty of Wang Wei. Therefore, the loss of part-time job did not have enough evidence to prove the direct causation. In addition, from ‘but for’ test, if Wang Wei did not hurt Li Min, she also confronted to be fired.…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Act Case Study

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Part - A Negligence Act Introduction: Lead that falls beneath the norms of conduct built up by law for the insurance of others against irrational risk of hurt. A man has acted carelessly in the event that he or she has withdrawn from the lead expected of a sensibly reasonable person acting under comparable conditions. With a specific end goal to set up carelessness as a Cause of Action under the law of TORTS, an offended party must demonstrate that the litigant had a duty to the offended party, the respondent ruptured that obligation by neglecting to comply with the required standard of lead, the defendant's careless direct was the reason for the mischief to the offended…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The procedure is normally very intricate and can best be handled by a personal injury lawyer. In cases such as yours, a lawyer’s focal point on compensation is as to whether the insurance company was negligent when the accident happened. The lawyer goes to great lengths trying to prove negligence in your case by calling eye witnesses to testify, photographs of the accident scene will be presented just to prove your case. Are you up to the task? Then, let the lawyers be.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays