Rebecca Dresser's Drugs And The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Dresser, Rebecca S. "Drugs and The Death Penalty." Webscohost. Hastings Center Report, 1 Jan. 2014. Web. 10 Mar. 2016

The author Rebecca Dresser is both a professor and an expert in biomedical ethics. She works at the Washington University School of Medicine teaching the legality of many biomedical issues. In the past she was the President’s council of Bioethics, worked at the U.S. District Court for the Western District Wisconsin, and had a fellowship in the Psychiatry Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The essay began stating that in 2013 Missouri was unable to execute a murderer due to the morality of using propofol. A brief history was the. Given on when lethal injections began back in the 1980s. A court case was mention
…show more content…
In 1997 he received the Criminologist of the Year Award. He won the Paul Tappan Award in 2006 for outstanding contributions to the Field of Criminology. He also won the Steven M. Goldstein Criminal Justice Award in 2000. In the section titled “How Does Deterrence Work? He first starts off stating whether or not deterrence works better with the death penalty, or life a long prison sentence. This question is being asked because Texas offered life without parole to those eligible, instead of being put to death. In the time period that occurred he stated that there was no correlation because homicide rates and the temporary removal of the death penalty. He insists that a murderer isn't thinking about the death penalty while they are murdering someone, because someone of a stable mindset wouldn't do such a horrific crime in the first place. He then argues that the only time murder would be deterred is when people get in bar fights, or other unplanned deaths. Which he then justifies aren't common at all, and don't always result in a first degree murder sentence. He concludes with stating that having the death penalty in place as a deterrence of murder is a ludicrous idea. I will be able to use this source within writing project 3 because it will help support the argument for the death penalty. This writing will also argue against the idea of the death penalty being a means of deterrence in committing murder. There is also no bias because you can't combat data on homicides not lowering when the death penalty was implemented. “We expect that some of the would-be Texas murderers who think about sanctions would recognize this new law and take their friend or loved one to New Mexico to kill them, thus risking “only” LWOP. Obviously, this idea is absurd. Murderers tend not to think ahead, especially those who kill friends or

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    In considering whether physician participation in capital punishment is just, it is essential to recall the purpose of the purpose of capital punishment, the harm that lethal injections can cause and the purpose of medicine. Now, in the introduction of this essay, I stated that the underlying purpose of this essay is not to provide a stance on the subject of capital punishment. However, in order to provide a justification for why physicians should not participate in capital punishment, it is necessary to provide a stance on capital punishment. In fact, According to Ph.D. Adam Kadlac states…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In this section, I will argue that life sentence without parole is the sentence he should receive, instead of death penalty. Even though I believe that John McCluskey is not responsible for committing the murder, I do believe that he should receive a life sentence without parole based on the deterrence theory that punishing criminals is justified for the reason that it deters future crime. And, my reason is based on the grounds that the right to punish on the right to self-defense. One might argue that there seems to be a conflict between my belief that…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay, I will contend that Brock’s argument in favor of the moral permissibility of voluntary active euthanasia (VAE) is sound and that Brock offers persuasive responses to the objection that (A) VAE is an act which involves the deliberate killing of an innocent person and (B) the deliberate killing of an innocent person is always morally wrong. To achieve this, I will begin by summarizing Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE. Then, I will synthesize the objection to Brock’s argument and Brock’s subsequent responses. Finally, I will describe why I find Brock’s responses persuasive. Brock’s argument for the moral permissibility of VAE can be constructed as follows: (1) VAE is supported by the “values of patient well-being…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Michael Gill’s article “A moral defense of Oregon’s physician-assisted suicide law” he defends the law against two objections by providing arguments from opponents of PAS and proponents of PAS. The first objection that Gill defends is “that it is intrinsically wrong for someone to kill herself” (2005). The second objection is that “it is intrinsically wrong for physicians to assist someone in killing herself” (Gill, 2005). The physician assisted suicide law allows terminally ill residents of Oregon who are mentally competent and have less than six months to live to request a doctor to prescribe a medication that will cause a quick and painless death.…

    • 2296 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors carry a lot of responsibility; they are expected to save and of fix lives. Patients know there are medical miracles, and everyone wants to be that miracle. But doctors understand the reality. If someone is suffering terminally ill, is it ethical for a doctor to end the misery? Or should they wait around for the very slim chance of a medical miracle?…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physician-Assisted Suicide Be Legal in Every State When it comes to the topic of physician-assisted suicide, most of will readily agree that the patient has their right to choose their form of treatment; if they chose death, then the reasoning is that they chose to die with dignity. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is on the question of, does allowing patients to die under a doctor’s care deem the death as murder. Some are convinced that it does, other maintain that allowing patients to do so in tern, breaks the Hippocratic Oath. Here in the states, we are very fortunate with every law and amendment that gives us the right to do with what we want with limits.…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Teresa Lewis Case

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On September 23rd, 2011, Teresa Lewis, a citizen of Danville, Virginia, was pronounced dead by lethal-injection at approximately 9:13 p.m. (Crawford 74). Being that 46 executions took place in 2010, Teresa Lewis’s case would seem indifferentiable to the others; however, evaluations of Lewis’s mental state incited controversy based on the morality of her case (“The Death Penalty…”). The controversy erupted after Lewis’s defense lawyer filed a position for clemency briefly after disclosing that she had an I.Q. of 72, providing the justification that Lewis “did not possess the intelligence to have planned for the killings” (“US woman Teresa…”). Much to the dismay of her defense lawyers, family, and advocates, Teresa Lewis still underwent lethal injection for conspiring to murder her husband and stepson.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Hypocritical Taking of Lives It seemed like a normal February night for Wanda Lopez, a single mother, working behind the register of the Shamrock gas station convenience store. That is, until she noticed a man loitering outside the door in the parking lot of where she worked. She called the police to report the drunk who had just come from the bar next door and was told to call back if he came inside. A few minutes later, the man walked into the store holding a knife.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is clear that the utmost importance in any medical context is the relationship between the healthcare practitioner and the patient. The duty of a physician is to adhere to certain principles of medical ethics namely the principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. By examining the case study involving Dr. Nancy Morrison, one can observe that these principles are often ambiguous when referring to the issue of whether she committed voluntary active euthanasia or nonvoluntary active euthanasia. Thus, the thesis will aim to exemplify that ultimately Dr. Nancy Morrison was culpable for her actions. To give some context to the issue, Paul Mills was a 65-year-old individual suffering from terminal esophageal cancer.…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong” In “Physician-Assisted Suicide is Always Wrong”, author Ryan T. Anderson uses the ethical argument to ascertain that physician-assisted suicide is always wrong. On this controversial topic, the author is appealing to a philosophy: physician assisted suicide doesn’t progress the medical community; but rather it undermines the doctor’s overwhelming ethical responsibility to treat the sick all the way until the very end. In this piece, Anderson genuinely promotes the idea that our society would genuinely put the medical community in danger, as well as possibly put the lives of terminally ill people if our nation expanded laws allowing physician-assisted suicide throughout the entire country. Anderson believes it is unethical due to the digressive impact it has on the medical community in general.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay is for the Writer to examine and analyze methodology and legalities of ending one’s life options and ethical foundations surrounding the right to life targeting the following areas of concerns: 1) Physician Assisted- Suicide; and 2) Pro-life Proponent arguments. Background This writer understands the complexities of life as how many differences exist regarding physician- assisted suicide (PAS) as a state of suicide and pro–life choices that can be deemed by some as ethical suffering. Today, End of Life (EOL) does not have to be considered suicide or a war against pro-life when making competent choices such as advance directives, transitional services and or resources that could ease anxiety in decision-making choices…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine a loved one’s frail body lying prone on a hospital bed. They have less than six months to live, and they are helpless to do anything except lie there in immense pain. Every night they plea for a quick death, but it never comes. The law ensures their death will be slow and painful; however, there may still be hope. In 1994, Oregon passed the Death with Dignity Act which legalized the use of euthanasia (“Physician-Assisted” 833).…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Against Assisted Suicide In many countries around the world, it is legal for doctors to prescribe a medicine that can potentially end a patient’s life if the patient wishes to commit suicide. In the United States, four states -Vermont, Oregon, Washington, and Montana- are the only states which have chosen to legalize assisted suicide (Backmann par. 6). Physician assisted suicide, also called assisted suicide, has become an extremely sensitive topic that has been debated by everyone, from academic scholars to everyday people, and has become almost as controversial as abortion.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    War On Drugs Failed

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thesis: The American war on drugs has been a problem since it began in the late 19th century. This so called “war” has been an embarrassment and a failure to the American nation. The war on drugs uses an excess of tax dollars, violates state and individual liberties, and is causing a speedy and frightening deterioration of the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Why has the War on Drugs Failed and What Can We do About It??…

    • 2360 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Mercy Killing

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    We are being inhumane to force people to continue suffering in this way (Newman, 1996). Choosing for a more painless death comes a lot easier for patients along with family who witness the pain of their loved is enduring with all the medications and treatments (which tend to cause severe side effects). I believe that is justified. Especially knowing that the chances of survival are very slim for the patient. Supports of the mercy killing ask whether it is rational or not to keep a terminally ill patient who’s hopes of survival are slim and alive on a support system when our medical infrastructure is under immense pressure (Naik, 2011).…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays