Reasons Why North Won And Why South Lose The Civil War

Improved Essays
Why north won and why south lost have intrigued historians to pinpoint on the exact reason for south losing the civil war. I blame Jefferson Davis head of the confederacy poor leadership and lack of getting along with his generals, the state’s rights prevented unification of the south, the south’s failure of recognition by England and France. North’s superior resources and the south’s poor morale by the wars end made the outcome inevitable. Firstly, unification of the south was prevented by the states right which helped to destroy the very confederacy it helped to create. Southern politics, government and economics, internal conflicts of liberty and organizing hindered mobilization of war efforts. Rather the southern people insisted on retaining …show more content…
Besides the south’s conflicts with state governments Jefferson Davis’s inability to work effectively with his generals caused the south to lose the civil war. When congress adopted a bill establishing the office of the general in chief for Lee, Davis vetoed it. Davis’s well known feuds with two of the confederacy’s generals Beauregard and Joseph Johnston without a doubt hurt the souths war efforts. Even more so Davis could not get along with other confederate leaders. Davis used excessive energy in contentions and even ……. Argument. Davis wanted to operate as the secretary of war and his own general in chief. Davis made terrible choices for the commanders and often selected men of personal preference than qualifications. Davis never admitted his wrong “seemed to prefer winning an argument if it would help win the war.” (….) The confederates lost due to faulty strategy and poor leadership and not due to its numbers. As David Patter once said “If the union and the confederacy had exchanged presidents with one another, the confederacy might have won …show more content…
The union had advantages in ample resources of just about everything the south did not have. With the north’s sheer manpower ratio were unbelievably one sided with north having an advantage of five to two not including the slaves or freedmen. The union had large lands available for growing food, hence served dual purpose of food for hungry soldiers and money for its ever growing industries, railroads, and telegraph links, a ……. Lifeline of any army, or any countries side but left the south isolated, outdated, and starving. The south developed a ……………. Straw in the form of economic colonialism. The confederates were too willing to sell for profit what little raw materials they had left to the north. “The north could have fought the war with one hand behind their back”.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1854 the Republican Party impeded any chance of preserving the Union, for Lincoln stated “In my opinion, it will not cease, until a crisis shall have been reached and passed” (Lincoln, “House Divided”). The formation of the party happened as the issues of slavery was becoming a bigger issue. Their views and campaign of abolishing slavery made the issue even worse than it was due to the fact that it influenced people to take action against it. Therefore, the formation of the Republican Party was the sole reason for why the Civil War took place. It has since made compromise hard to accomplish and friction between the two parties intensify.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tanner uses information and guidance from the famous Carl Von Clausewitz, to support his claim the south did not have a unifying reason for going to war. Clausewitz states “war is a continuation of politics by other means” and a nation should know what the people fight for, and if they do not, support or assistance from the common people will dwindle (pg. 78). The lack of political knowledge southerners obtained hindered the amount of support they gave, which would devastate the confederate armies if they did execute the Fabian warfare. Tanner also brings up the fact the confederate terrain remained very large and spacious, which benefitted and crippled the confederate…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The South couldn 't afford to loose business from Britain and he assumed they would find an alternative source of labor. This issue was too hot and profitable for the South, so they were ready to defend the institution of slavery. Lincoln could have released the Emancipation Proclamation years earlier, but he knew this would cause outright rebellion. For this reason, he held off and continued to hope for a peaceful solution. This hopeful solution never happened and the Civil war began.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is plentiful discourse as to why the Northern Union won the Civil War in 1865 against the Southern Confederacy. Although the military leadership from Abraham Lincoln and Ulysses S. Grant in the North and Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee in the South both impacted the outcome, Jefferson Davis’s poor political leadership both as president and commander in chief led to the Northern victory, particularly his defective judgements regarding military affairs and his moderate leadership as president that yielded tenuous relations with the Confederate people. According to David M. Potter, Jefferson Davis was not fit to command the Confederate Army. He was “his own secretary of war and his own general in chief” in which he included departmentalization…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His election posed a threat to the people, whereby they felt that the government was overstepping their mandate by fighting for the rights of the slaves. The states did not like the way things were being run, and it was evident that Abraham Lincoln was anti-slavery; Lincoln favors the northern states views on slavery by giving them a chance. Southern states were opposed that Lincoln interests was to support their idea of having slaves, but instead Lincoln went against them. For this reason, these states lost confidence in him and decided to start their states which they could be ruled the best way they knew how by a government of their choice. Abraham Lincoln was against the expansion of the use of slaves, and this irritated the southern states because they were pro-slavery and could not do without the…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lincoln even refused to sign the Wade- Davis Bill, which mandated strict requirement for the south before they could make their new government. Andrew Johnson, who was the president after Lincoln’s death, tried to follow Lincoln’s footstep. However, the republican prevented Johnson from doing that.Since those republicans were angered by the destruction that the Civil War caused, the Republicans treated the southern government as criminals. In addition, Johnson was racist and it caused a drift between him and the republicans. Like Lincoln, Johnson was willing to forgive the south, if they promise to support the Union and abolish slavery.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Louis XIV decided to fund the American effort, not because he liked the new world, but because of his hatred for England. He believed that if the Americans were able to defeat the English, France could finally lay claim to valuable English colonies. While he had rationalization for funding the Americans, his contributions ruined France financially and plunged them into deep debt. This left virtually no money for the country to address the class divide and social and economic problems stirring at home. Something had to be done to raise revenue, and higher taxes were an obvious…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did The South Lose The Civil War? The primary reason why the South lost the Civil War was because of their insistence upon retaining democratic liberties during wartime. The Union’s victory was then achieved because of their ability to suppress certain liberties for the greater good of the people. For instance, the Southern soldiers were disobedient and overconfident because the little guy had been able to achieve amazing victories in previous wars. However, the South lacked the leadership that allowed for the militarial feats to occur.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henceforth, slavery was still a key component towards the south’s economic wealth. More importantly, at this time, the country’s factories and banks together were no match for the economic value of slaves. Therefore, even though the northern states were able to incorporate and utilize the industrial era, the southern states remained predominant to an agricultural economic which was still in need of slaves and slave labor. The disagreement between the two states could not be settled without an armed conflict. As a matter of fact, both groups tried to avoid the war but it was inevitable.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reconstruction (1865-1877) refers to the efforts made by the government to not only unify and rebuild relations between the North and the South but to also polish the depressing status of Black Americans. However the lack of political and social effort along with untreated economic wounds, halted Reconstruction, subsequently causing it to be unsuccessful for several reasons. The Freedmen’s Bureau was not only underfunded, but it was discontinued, leaving a massive number of Black Americans illiterate, land reform was not provided which then forced freed Blacks into the ingenious creation of sharecropping, the discriminatory Black Codes, though unconstitutional made racism legal and Reconstruction itself was terminated after only 12 years leaving…

    • 1388 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays