Is The Death Penalty Justified Essay

Improved Essays
The Death Penalty: Justified for Limited Reasons
Capital Punishment is considered to be a controversial topic in the United States and will continue to be for many years. Surely some states do not agree with the death penalty, but there are certain types of murderers who should receive capital punishment. The death of numerous people at once or a killer who murders a large number of people at different times are considered to be heinous and should receive capital punishment. Murders involving a child or an elder is certainly not right either. Indisputably, the death penalty is only warranted for limited reasons such as mass murderers, serial killers, and the killers of children and the elderly. The first type of murderer who deserves to be on death row is the killer of numerous people all at one time. It is hard to fathom that such a person would do something so terrible to innocent lives. Edward Koch, former mayor of New York, states, “when we protect guilty lives, we give up innocent lives in exchange” (487). Koch’s point could not be more true because, if we fail to put someone on death row for mass murder the we do not avenge the innocent lives that were taken. If I were related to one of the victims of a mass
…show more content…
Surely other murderers in different situations deserve only life imprisonment. Opponents say that every life is valued, but no life of a mass murderer should be valued. Additionally, a murderer of children and the elderly who is mentally ill, deserves no special treatment. Furthermore, the death penalty is not costly when compared to the costs of the life imprisonment that these murderers would have if the death penalty is not enforced. If the death penalty is warranted for these certain types of murderers, then the United States would be safer environment for everyone to live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system. The arguing stance for the death penalty says it deters murders, but in reality, the death penalty just leads to another loss of human life - regardless of the murder being an execution. When somebody tortures another human being, the government does not decide to torture that person in return. It’s the same for a rapist; the government does not rape the rapist. So, why does the government decide to murder the murderer?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to vengeance in the case of theft or rape, people do not exactly want an eye for an eye. They think putting the convicted criminal in prison is acceptable for a rape or robbery, but why do they think that the death penalty is the only reasonable punishment for a convicted murderer? Why does life imprisonment not work in a murder case? In this essay, I am going to argue that the…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Cons

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Death Penalty: Killing Hundreds of Humans Each year less than hundreds of humans are killed...legally. The death penalty is something used to the criminals that have done a horrific crime such as man slaughter, mass killings, etc. The death penalty is something that is used when the police officers and/or judge has decided that the criminal does not deserve to live after the crimes he or she has done. The death penalty should not be used because it is cruel, hypocritical, and not a good alternative. The death penalty has the crowd of people saying no the death penalty should not be allowed.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But a number of people are still against the death penalty for moral reasons, even though, it would bring them safety. In Stanley Marcus’s article, “Public Safety Requires the Death Penalty” Marcus questions convicted murderers about their crimes, “they had no hesitation in killing again and again because they were subject to no more severe punishment than if they were convicted of robbery - and often even less.” (New York Times Article Marcus). We need capital punishment to frighten criminals and to get rid of them when they do wrong. Clearly, these criminals have no morals about killing, so why should we risk our safety to keep them alive? The convicted killers even admitted that they had no hesitation in killing the first time and they would have no hesitation killing again.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We’re only human, we all make mistakes,” is a commonly used phrase, but it’s tried and true. Some people were being executed based on random choice or personal desire, rather than any reason or system. “The justices of the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling, decided that the death penalty was indeed being applied in arbitrary, inconsistent ways, clearly a situation in which racism could prevail unchecked.”(Stewart 59) According to Amnesty International, “The death penalty legitimizes an irreversible act of violence by the state and will inevitably claim innocent victims.” The drastic measure of capital punishment should not be taken. It does not allow the opportunity for the accused to be proven innocent, a violation of the Fifth Amendment which guarantees due process of law. Proponents of the death penalty say it is an important tool for preserving law and order, deters crime, and costs less than life imprisonment.…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bruck states, “I don’t claim that executions of entirely innocent people will occur very often. But they will occur” (Bruck 495). Bruck wants assurance that if the death penalty is going to put to action, to at least be sure that the person being convicted of the crime is truly guilty. Imagine all those people who were executed and were innocent. Like Koch and Bruck, justice should be equal for all, but in Bruck’s defense, justice wouldn’t be equal for all if innocent people were killed for a crime they did not commit and the sad part is that you can’t fix it because they would be already…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Contrary to Meehan’s view, the death penalty deters crime. While there is no way to bring victims back from the dead, the death penalty gives justice to the victim’s family. When potential criminals know they might be put to death for a crime, they will be more hesitant than if though punishment were less severs. The death penalty makes sense as a consequence for crimes, like murder, where the victims’ families must live with the horrors of being attacked. Allowing their attackers to go free after just a few years is hardly justice.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This crime would be more extreme than the initial one for two reasons. Firstly, it is his second murder, and secondly, it was far more premeditated than his first murder. If it is still not agreed that the death penalty is proportionate to this person’s crime, imagine if he continues to murder other guards and inmates. He is already in prison for life, so the only punishment, aside from additional life sentences, which are going to have no affect on this murderer, that could possibly be implemented at this point is the death penalty. Reason tells us that there ought to be punishment, and in this case, the person has established a history of murdering.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jesus Hernandez Is it acceptable in any case to kill a possible innocent human? Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a man or woman to death instead of him or her serving time in a penitentiary for committing a serious crime like murder. This is an issue everyone should be concerned about because taking away someone’s life is serious and cannot be undone. This issue cannot be focused on by only the government because the citizens need to know how it is affecting them as well. Families could lose loved ones due to a death sentence, and the taxpayers have to pay out of their own pockets for the cost of the execution.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, not all murder cases meet the same criteria. Often when people are killed by other people, it’s not premeditated. Therefore, if we decided that all people who kill people are to be killed themselves, the world would be a disaster. Life imprisonment without any chance of parole has proven to be a severe enough punishment to discourage people from committing crimes of such violent…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics