Argumentative Essay: The Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

Improved Essays
The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb. The strongest points as to why we should not have dropped the atomic bomb are mostly related to the bomb being dropped for unjust reasons or that it was essentially a geopolitical power play. But, these ideas also contain flaws that ultimately do not create a strong case for not dropping the bomb. The most commonly used reason, undoubtedly, is that even without the …show more content…
The bomb was never dropped on Germany and the Allies managed to defeat them, so why did we need to drop it on the Japanese? This argument seems like complete ludicrous. The Americans were more willing to use the atomic bomb on the Japanese because of how cruel they had been to the Americans and the Chinese was a lot worse than what the Germans had done to them. Not to say that the Germans were not coldblooded themselves. Also the war was obviously coming closer to an end, so they would be more inclined to end the war immediately because the Soviets were coming closer and closer to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    DBQ: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan The decision President Truman had to make regarding dropping a fission bomb onto Japanese cities in order to end the war would have been too hard for most of us to handle. America was weary after 4 years of almost total war with Germany, Italy, and Japan and the war needed to end. At this point, Japan was alone and dragging its feet after many losses. From the history we know, the decision was justified as it ended a devastating war with no end in sight and it saved more lives than were lost.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With the war still going on, Truman gave Japan one final warning, which Japan ignored. Then on August 6, the United States dropped the weapon on Hiroshima. On August 9, the city of Nagasaki was hit. One day later Japan surrendered. President Truman made the right decision to use the nuclear bomb on Japan.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, I investigated the sources that were against the use of the bomb before the bomb was dropped including the intentions behind the bomb, and concerns from the Interim Committee . Then I looked at the evidence against the bomb after the bomb was dropped, including Henry Stimson’s concerns, and the horrific loss of Japanese life due to the bomb. It is interesting to see the difference between the worries before the bomb and after the bomb. The first document I looked at was Dropping the Atomic Bomb was Neither Necessary Nor Justifiable by Gar Alperovitz. In his essay he argues one of the reasonings for the use of the bomb was to scare the Soviets and to prevent an invasion of the Red Army in Manchuria.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Germany could have used this weapon with malice, with the intention of mass destruction. The fear caused by the use of the Atomic Bomb by Germany would have been fear of the country itself, instead of fear of escalating threats if the war did not end. The United States used the bomb to essentially cease fighting, with the goal of making this last statement and hoped that in turn the other countries would follow suit in never letting war get back to such a desperate and severe stage again. Additionally, the scientists involved in creating the bomb urged President Truman to use the bomb quickly, “It was their recommendation that the bomb be used against the enemy as soon as it could be done”(Source1). If we had not used the bomb first,…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hiroshima Essay It has now been a little over seven decades since the catastrophic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were unleashed and nuclear warfare was unveiled to the world. This attack took place toward the end of World War II, in which the United States dropped “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” on the Japanese, resulting in detrimental losses, and an inevitable surrender from Japan, but at what cost? The devastation that was caused not only affected Japan, but the entire world at the time. Countless lives were lost and a new type of warfare introduced.…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    being President for two weeks and he had already had a significant decision to make. The bomb was first tested in Alamogordo, Mexico and was successful. In July of 1945 Harry Truman had the decision to drop the bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 . There are two sides to using of this bomb, the traditional and revisionist.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The decision to use the atomic bomb | atomic bomb. (2016). Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 21 April 2016 The Decision to Drop the Bomb [ushistory.org].…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The cost and harsh aftermath of bombs are the second reason why the bombs should not have been dropped. Even though the bombs were a great achievement for America, the result of the bombs was seen as a harsh punishment. A quote from the same article says, “but that experience, looking down and finding nothing left of Hiroshima. Hiroshima didn’t exist.” The result of the atomic killed on a massive scale destroyed the city along with its people.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As it is essential to recognize that not only was Japan ready to surrender and were given no choice to modify its unconditional surrender. But also destroyed two cities which were limited in military value and had civilians out number Japanese troops, but also were destroyed simply fro power in politics between the U.S and the Soviet Union. The facts from the presidents administrators, secretary of war and even Truman’s chief of staff all stood together and stated that it was unethical, barbaric and abhorrent. Many historians have fought continuously over which was decision was right or wrong to choose, but most evidence indicates that it was the wrong thing to do morally. Furthermore, the bomb was used for several wrong reasons such as causing fear to both Soviet and Japanese governments, in order to put an end to the war and be capable of unconditionally place restrictions at both governments basically holding both countries hostage until their demands were…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Was the U.S justified in dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the Second World War? Discuss the benefits and costs that it resulted.” 1. Introduction During World War Two, the U.S dropped two atomic bombs on the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki, causing high death rates upon the Japanese. Many people may argue that the bombings were devastating and have had a dreadful effect on people’s lives.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Weapons: The Controversy Nuclear weapons have been around for quite some time. There have often been debates on whether they should be outlawed or not. Many cons on nuclear weapons outweigh the pros some may argue. Some of these cons include costs, damage to humanity, the environment we live in, and possible miscommunications that may occur between countries.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays