Except when a reasonable search is necessary to protect the lives of others as well as self. It would then be (probable cause) and become necessary to search all involved. Especially, in this circumstance because the officer observed unusual behavior that happened 24 times giving the suspects ample time to decide against carrying out their actions. The officer suspected their actions as an attempt to “casing a job, a stick up,” the officer followed two of the suspects and saw them rejoin with the third man in front of another store. The officer decided to approach the three men, identified himself as a police officer and asked their names. The three men mumbled among themselves which caused the officer to become a little aggressive by asking the three men to enter a store and put their hands up and face the wall. The officer then decided to do a search from the outside of their clothing 1st to determine if any of the men had weapons and after being more thoroughly searched the officer was able to seize and obtain a pistol and a revolver. They were then taken to the police station and two of the three men with the weapons were charged with carrying concealed weapons. These Amendments were established to protect and save lives and should not be abused on either side; whether it’s the law being carried out to determine if a crime is being committed by a suspect or a citizen or a suspect is being falsely accused of a crime not committed. Many police officers have been killed in the line of duty trying to protect individuals. As well as innocent people being injured or killed in the process of obtaining the facts whether the individual committed the crime or not. Certain individuals are targeted because of bias thinking and should have no place in determining anyone’s fate. Both sides are =c A beat cop in Cleveland observed, while patrolling, in the downtown area, two strange men and another man alternately pausing and staring in a street window 24 times because it was noticeable and unusual. The beat cop decided to investigate further because after their completion of their route they conferenced. The new standard of “Reasonable Suspicion” created by the Supreme court for the police department is, in my opinion, valid. When a person exhibits abnormal behavior, when observed, and after being
Except when a reasonable search is necessary to protect the lives of others as well as self. It would then be (probable cause) and become necessary to search all involved. Especially, in this circumstance because the officer observed unusual behavior that happened 24 times giving the suspects ample time to decide against carrying out their actions. The officer suspected their actions as an attempt to “casing a job, a stick up,” the officer followed two of the suspects and saw them rejoin with the third man in front of another store. The officer decided to approach the three men, identified himself as a police officer and asked their names. The three men mumbled among themselves which caused the officer to become a little aggressive by asking the three men to enter a store and put their hands up and face the wall. The officer then decided to do a search from the outside of their clothing 1st to determine if any of the men had weapons and after being more thoroughly searched the officer was able to seize and obtain a pistol and a revolver. They were then taken to the police station and two of the three men with the weapons were charged with carrying concealed weapons. These Amendments were established to protect and save lives and should not be abused on either side; whether it’s the law being carried out to determine if a crime is being committed by a suspect or a citizen or a suspect is being falsely accused of a crime not committed. Many police officers have been killed in the line of duty trying to protect individuals. As well as innocent people being injured or killed in the process of obtaining the facts whether the individual committed the crime or not. Certain individuals are targeted because of bias thinking and should have no place in determining anyone’s fate. Both sides are =c A beat cop in Cleveland observed, while patrolling, in the downtown area, two strange men and another man alternately pausing and staring in a street window 24 times because it was noticeable and unusual. The beat cop decided to investigate further because after their completion of their route they conferenced. The new standard of “Reasonable Suspicion” created by the Supreme court for the police department is, in my opinion, valid. When a person exhibits abnormal behavior, when observed, and after being