Persuasive Speech On Nuclear Weapons

Improved Essays
On August 6th 1945, the United States of America dropped a nuclear bomb on Hiroshima killing around 80,000 people and wiping out 90% of the city. 71 years later President Barack Obama, payed tribute to the victims of Hiroshima at the Hiroshima Peace Memorial located in Japan. The president also prepared a speech. Obama’s speech outlined the effects of nuclear weapons and the amount of power a country has over these deadly weapons. The idea of nuclear weapons has always been a controversial debate. Some people see the use in nuclear weapons while others disagree with nuclear weapons. Certain individuals who belong to certain global perspective speak of such global issues. These global perspectives are Realism, Liberalism and Marxism. Realists …show more content…
Firstly, liberalists oppose the use of nuclear weapons because they believe that nations could fix any sort of disagreements with each other through cooperation. Through cooperation nations are able to come up with safer alternatives to certain issues, while nuclear weapons will only inflict damage on targeted countries. “International trade is to be encouraged because it will lead to greater wealth and human well-being, as well as fewer wars since trade promotes cooperation, trust and mutual interest.” (Sens/Stoett 20) Treaties and international institutions were created to ensure cooperation between states. This cooperation leads to nations having better relationships with each other. “An international community established institutions and treaties that work to avoid war and aspire to restrict and roll back and ultimately eliminate the existence of nuclear weapons”(Obama). These treaties and institutions ensured the ability to avoid war. Without war there wouldn’t be a need to use nuclear weapons because through cooperation states were able to come to peaceful and reasonable solutions. Through cooperation nations were able to create treaties and institutions to solve issues that have a global

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If one were to decide whether proliferation should occur simply from this information, the only rational choice would be to oppose the negative consequences. However, preventing proliferation undermines the powers of other nations. The prohibition of procurement or development of nuclear weapons for some countries, and the acceptance of stockpiling of nuclear arsenal for other countries cannot be justified. Furthermore, democratic nations such as the United States guarantee equality and liberty to their citizens, but hypocritically prevent other nations from developing nuclear arsenal that they themselves enjoy. In addition to reaping economic advantages and increased influence in international politics, these countries, through the development of nuclear weapons, will also gain a sense of security that they will be able to retaliate if attacked.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eighty thousand citizens lost their lives immediately after the bomb hit Hiroshima. In the article, “Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”, an eyewitness described what it was like when the bomb struck. The witness described people with “raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips” and “women without jaws screamed incoherently for help”. Innocent women and children paid the ultimate price for the attack made by Japan. Not only did hundreds die immediately after the blast but another 60,000 died by the end of the year.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And even if we never go to war with our weapons, Worldwide transgressions and arguments are solved easier because they know of our power. On the other hand people who believe our nuclear weapons should be dismantled state their view that nuclear weapons only cause problems. They make other nations not like us because nuclear weapons are very hostile and have nothing friendly about them and hurt the morals of our nation and others ( Pros and Cons of Nuclear Weapons Paragraph 8 ). North Korea feels the need to make more nuclear weapons because of ours. The United States should retain their nuclear arsenal because they help keep our nation safe, If we go to war we can use them to scare off other nations or worst case scenario, use the weapons, and nuclear weapons are more cost efficient than some may…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although it is true that proliferation may prevent wars through deterrence, and that eradicating nuclear weapons will lead to a lower sense of security, the negative consequences outweigh the benefits. Nuclear proliferation can lead to catastrophic devastation to the entire human population through the deaths of millions of people and losses of trillions of dollars in property. The chances of nuclear terrorism and the growth of a nuclear black market will increase significantly if proliferation occurs in new countries. Furthermore, the deterrence theory does not apply to terrorists and dangerous proletariats such as North Korea due to the huge role psychological mindset plays for the success of the deterrence theory. The growth of nuclear weapons can be countered by a policy of conservative internationalism.…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, when facing conflicts, states will prefer to choose diplomatic way to negotiate and compromise, which actually provides a good opportunity to promote the global communication and cooperation. In that way, nuclear weapons have the deterrence function to maintain the world peace and stabilize the current international system. 2 In state level, nuclear weapons are the most power instruments for one country to defend its homeland security. By possessing nuclear weapons, a state may also enhance its international status and increase its citizens’ national pride,…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Day That Flashed By, And Then Again During the second World War many inhumane things were done, which made this war one of the worst in history. On August 6th, 1945, Hiroshima became victim to the first atomic bomb deployed by The United States. The bomb immediately killed tens of thousands of people; many more would later die of radiation exposure. Three days later a second deployed bomb was dropped on Nagasaki killing an estimated, forty thousand people. With these bombings, thousands of civilians were, brutally without warning, killed in an attempt to end the war.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Pyongyang blantly expressed he had no desire to stop his nuclear program so the only option for the safety of others is to make him stop by using coercion. I also think it would be a good idea to involve other states to help influence Pyongyang’s irrational behavior “geopolitical consideration also required the United States to bring China, Japan, South Korea, and Russia. These partners would enhance strength of coercive measures and inducements.”10 It is important that when the sanctions are imposed relatively quickly so it more likely to be successful and for future threats to be deemed credible. Sanctions that are targeted to weaken Pyongyang’s economy and military have to significantly hit the ruling class to make them give up the nuclear program. The ruling class is mostly party leaders, military officials and bureaucrats “the regime provides a wide spectrum of selective rewards to its ruling elites in return for loyalty, including residency and special housing benefits in Pyongyang, better and more food, and access to scarce goods such as luxury cars, jewelry, and electronics.”11 Focusing on the ruling class would be very influential because some even get revenue from the sanctions so once they stop receiving an incentive they will no longer want to support Pyongyang.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl T. Compton also makes very good points defending the use of the atomic bomb. Compton gives many facts and numbers as to why the dropping of the atomic bomb was not as bad as two bombing raids over Tokyo. In Tokyo there were about 80,000 deaths from the atomic bomb. In Nagasaki there were around 45,000 deaths from the atomic bombs. In the bombing raids over Tokyo one raid killed around 125,000 people and another around 100,000 people.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Iran’s ambition for nuclear weapons has already created deep-seated tensions within the region and its development of nuclear weapons holds the dangerous probability of destroying the peace created by regional international regimes. Waltz’s argument is flawed because he ignores the possibility of states having different motivational factors in developing nuclear weapons than simply for…

    • 1015 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Manhattan Project Effects

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    An atomic bomb was released upon them, instantaneously killing approximately 80,000 people. Three days later, Nagasaki was attacked when a second bomb was dropped, killing another 40,000 people. Truman responded to the bombs by saying, “I regarded the bomb as a military weapon and never had any doubt that it should be used. ' ' His decision made a huge impact in history. The war was the major cause of the Manhattan project, it had many long lasting effects on the people and the surrounding areas.…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays